Immediate Threat
Appeal Brief
Disaster | 4516 |
Applicant | Manchester School District |
Appeal Type | Second |
PA ID# | 011-UHVZP-00 |
PW ID# | GMP 724161/ PW 541 |
Date Signed | 2025-05-19T12:00:00 |
Summary Paragraph
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a major disaster declaration for the state of New Hampshire on April 3, 2020, with an incident period of January 20, 2020, to May 11, 2023. The Manchester School District (Applicant) requested reimbursement of $11,497.50 for self-cleaning handle wraps and elevator button covers used at its administration building. FEMA prepared Grants Manager Project 724161 to document the Applicant’s claim. FEMA issued a Determination Memorandum denying the claimed costs because the Applicant did not demonstrate that the items were either used for eligible cleaning and disinfection measures or approved surface disinfection products. The Applicant appealed, contending that these items, under FEMA’s COVID-19 policies, were also personal protective equipment or alternatively constituted temporary physical barriers. On January 23, 2025, the Region 1 Regional Administrator denied the appeal. FEMA found that the items did not constitute personal protective equipment (PPE) or temporary barriers under its COVID-19 policies. On March 14, 2025, the Applicant submitted its second appeal, reiterating its first appeal arguments.
Authorities
- Stafford Act §§ 403, 502.
- 44 C.F.R. §§ 206.206, 206.223(a)(1), 206.225(a).
- PAPPG, at 19-22, 57, and 133.
- O&O Policy, at 4-5; Work Eligible for Public Assistance Policy, at 3.
- Sumner County, FEMA-4514-DR-TN, at 3-4; Harris County, FEMA-4485-DR-TX, at 2.
Headnotes
- FEMA may provide assistance for cleaning and disinfection, done in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance or that of an appropriate public health official available at the time the work was completed, including the purchase and provision of necessary supplies and equipment in excess of the applicant’s regularly budgeted costs, implemented to facilitate the safe opening and operation of all eligible facilities in response to COVID-19. Eligible measures also include the purchase and distribution of face masks and PPE, such as protective clothing, and the acquisition installation of temporary physical barriers, such as plexiglass barriers and screens/dividers to support social distancing.
- Because the self-cleaning wraps and elevator button covers do not fall within the O&O Policy specific categories or any other comparable measure, the items do not qualify as PPE, cleaning and disinfection, or temporary physical barriers and are ineligible work. Accordingly, the costs for these items are ineligible for PA funding.
Conclusion
The claimed costs for self-cleaning handle wraps and elevator button covers are not associated with eligible emergency protective measures under FEMA’s COVID-19 policies. Therefore, this appeal is denied.
Appeal Letter
SENT VIA EMAIL
Robert M. Buxton Karen DeFrancis
Director Executive Director of Finance
New Hampshire Homeland Security Manchester School District
and Emergency Management (SAU-37)
33 Hazen Drive 20 Hecker Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Manchester, New Hampshire 03102
Re: Second Appeal – Manchester School District, PA ID: 011-UHVZP-00, FEMA-4516-DR-NH, Grants Manager Project (GMP) 724161/ Project Worksheet (PW) 541, Immediate Threat
Dear Robert M. Buxton and Karen DeFrancis:
This is in response to New Hampshire Homeland Security and Emergency Management’s (Recipient) letter dated March 26, 2025, which transmitted the referenced second appeal on behalf of Manchester School District (Applicant). The Applicant is appealing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) denial of $11,497.50 for self-cleaning handle wraps and elevator button covers purchased in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
As explained in the enclosed analysis, I have determined that the claimed costs for self-cleaning handle wraps and elevator button covers are not associated with eligible emergency protective measures under FEMA’s COVID-19 policies. Therefore, this appeal is denied.
This determination is the final decision on this matter pursuant to 44 C.F.R. § 206.206, Appeals.
Sincerely,
/S/
Robert M. Pesapane
Director, Public Assistance
Enclosure
cc: Frederick Doucette
Regional Administrator
FEMA Region 1
Appeal Analysis
Background
The corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a major disaster declaration for the state of New Hampshire on April 3, 2020, with an incident period of January 20, 2020, to May 11, 2023. Manchester School District (Applicant) requested $11,497.50 for the purchase of self-cleaning push bar or wide handle wraps, small handle wraps, and elevator button covers with two display labels from NanoTouch Materials, LLC.[1] The items have coated non-permanent self-adhesive plastic sheets which wrap around, and cover, touched areas, such as door handles, and react with UV light to provide a self-disinfecting surface. The Applicant used these items on high touch areas at its administration building between August 9, 2021, through February 9, 2022, to reduce the transmission of COVID-19.
On June 18, 2024, FEMA issued a Determination Memorandum (DM), denying the request. FEMA stated that the claimed costs were ineligible because the Applicant did not demonstrate that the handle wraps and elevator button covers were used to carry out eligible cleaning and disinfection measures in accordance with U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance at the time the work was performed or that they fell under the surface disinfection products on the U.S. Environmental Protect Agency’s (EPA) List N.[2]
First Appeal
The Applicant submitted an August 15, 2024 dated first appeal and supporting documentation, including NanoSeptic/NanoTouch technology articles.[3] The Applicant acknowledged that the handle wraps and elevator button covers were self-cleaning products but contended that these items were personal protective equipment (PPE) or a temporary physical barrier purchased as a reasonable emergency protective measure pursuant to FEMA’s COVID-19 policies. The New Hampshire Homeland Security and Emergency Management (Recipient) transmitted the first appeal to FEMA.
On January 23, 2025, the FEMA Region 1 Regional Administrator denied the appeal. FEMA found that the handle wraps and elevator button covers did not constitute personal protective equipment or temporary barriers under its Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Safe Opening and Operation Work Eligible for Public Assistance policy (O&O Policy) or Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Work Eligible for Public Assistance policy (Work Eligible for Public Assistance Policy). FEMA added that the use of self-cleaning pesticidal devices and products not registered with the EPA or on List N was not recommended by the CDC when carrying out surface cleaning and disinfection. Accordingly, FEMA concluded that the Applicant did not perform an eligible emergency protective measure.
Second Appeal
On March 14, 2025, the Applicant submitted its second appeal, reiterating its first appeal arguments. On March 26, 2025, the Recipient transmitted the Applicant’s second appeal to FEMA.
Discussion
FEMA is authorized to provide PA funding for emergency protective measures to save lives and protect public health and safety.[4] For emergency protective measures to be eligible, the applicant is responsible for showing the work is required due to an immediate threat resulting from the declared incident.[5] In response to COVID-19, eligible emergency protective measures include certain specific, limited measures implemented to facilitate the safe opening and operation of eligible facilities, such as cleaning and disinfection, the purchase and distribution of face masks and PPE, such as protective clothing (e.g., gowns, gloves), and the acquisition and installation of temporary physical barriers, such as plexiglass barriers and screens/dividers to support social distancing.[6] All work must be done in accordance with CDC guidance or that of an appropriate public health official available at the time the work was completed.[7] To be eligible, costs must be directly tied to the performance of eligible work, adequately documented, and necessary and reasonable to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.[8] It is the applicant’s responsibility to provide documentation to substantiate its claim is eligible and to clearly explain how those records support its appeal.[9]
Here, the Applicant claims that the purchased handle wraps and elevator button covers constituted eligible PPE, temporary barriers, and cleaning and disinfection supplies.However, the Applicant has not provided documentation demonstrating that the claimed items are comparable to PPE (such as N95 masks, face shields, or protective clothing), physical barriers (such as plexiglass barriers or screens/dividers to support social distancing), or cleaning and disinfection supplies described under any of the specific categories listed within FEMA’s O&O Policy or any other COVID-19 policy. The Applicant has also not demonstrated that the purchase of the items was done in accordance with CDC guidance or that of an appropriate public health official available at the time the items were purchased and installed.[10] On the contrary, one article provided by the Applicant states that the NanoSeptic technology had not yet been approved by the CDC.[11] Accordingly, these items are ineligible for PA funding.
Conclusion
The claimed costs for self-cleaning handle wraps and elevator button covers are not associated with eligible emergency protective measures under FEMA’s COVID-19 policies. Therefore, this appeal is denied.
[1] The Applicant initially submitted the items as part of Grants Manager Project (GMP) 692202, with a scope of work to purchase personal protective equipment (PPE), disinfection supplies, and air filters. It subsequently agreed to split out the project and move the purchase of NanoTouch self-cleaning surface covers into a separate project due to eligibility concerns and to allow the determination memorandum process to proceed.
[2] The CDC’s guidance for cleaning and disinfection recommends routine cleaning of “all frequently touched surfaces in the workplace, such as workstations, keyboards, telephones, handrails, and doorknobs” using “a detergent or soap and water,” and disinfection using “most common, [Environmental Protection Agency]-registered, household disinfectants.” CDC, Interim Guidance for Businesses and Employers Responding to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), at 10 (May 2020). List N is a page of registered disinfectant products that meet EPA criteria for disinfectant use on surfaces to kill all strains and variants of COVID-19 when used according to label directions.
[3] The articles included Allison Conti, Shipyard Keeps Workers Safe Using NanoSeptic Technology, at 3,
(Aug. 26, 2020) [hereinafter Conti Article]; KoneSpares, Parts to Keep You Moving and Self-Cleaning Surface Film (Oct. 30, 2024) and NanoTouch Materials, NanoSeptic Self-Cleaning Surfaces (Oct. 30, 2024). NanoTouch is the developer of NanoSeptic self-cleaning products.
[4] Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act §§ 403, 502 (2018), Title 42, United States Code §§ 5170b, 5192 (2018); Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) § 206.225(a) (2019).
[5] 44 C.F.R. §§ 206.223(a)(1), 206.225(a)(3)(i); Public Assistance Program and Policy Guide, FP 104-009-2, at 19,
57 (Apr. 1, 2018) [hereinafter PAPPG].
[6] FEMA Policy (FP) 104-21-0003, Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Safe Opening and Operation Work Eligible
for Public Assistance (Interim) (Version 2), at 4-5 (Sept. 8, 2021) [hereinafter O&O Policy]; see also FP 104-009-19, Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Work Eligible for Public Assistance (Interim), at 3 (Sept. 1, 2020) [hereinafter Work Eligible for Public Assistance Policy] (applicable to work performed on or after
September 15, 2020). Section C.3. of the Work Eligible for Public Assistance Policy states that only work associated with the performance of emergency protective measures specifically listed in this policy is eligible for PA in COVID-19-declared events.
[7] O&O Policy, at 4-5.
[8] PAPPG, at 21-22.
[9] 44 C.F.R. § 206.206(a); PAPPG, at 133.
[10] See FEMA Second Appeal Analysis, Sumner County, FEMA-4514-DR-TN, at 3-4 & n.10 (Mar. 12, 2025) (finding that the Applicant had not provided documentation demonstrating that its claimed costs were in excess of its regularly budgeted cleaning costs or that it tracked the additional claimed costs) citing FEMA Second Appeal Analysis, Harris County, FEMA-4485-DR-TX, at 2 (Feb. 19, 2025) (finding that the Applicant’s claim for routine cleaning supplies was not eligible because the Applicant did not demonstrate the supplies were used for eligible emergency protective measures in response to an immediate threat from COVID-19 in accordance with CDC guidance or that of an appropriate public health official).
[11] Conti Article, at 3. See also CDC, Cleaning and Disinfecting Your Facility (updated Apr. 5, 2021) (stating that the effectiveness of alternative surface disinfection methods such as ultrasonic waves, ozone generators, high intensity ultraviolet (UV) lights, and light emitting diode (LED) blue lights has not been fully established).