alert - warning

This page has not been translated into 简体中文. Visit the 简体中文 page for resources in that language.

Document Restoration

Appeal Brief Appeal Letter Appeal Analysis

Appeal Brief

Disaster1603-DR-LA
ApplicantN’R Peace, Inc.
Appeal TypeSecond
PA ID#071-UZZ5M-00
PW ID#1676
Date Signed2013-12-19T00:00:00

Citation:  FEMA-1603-DR-LA, N’R Peace, Inc., Document Restoration, Project Worksheet (PW) 1676

Cross-Reference:  Work Eligibility

Summary:   Hurricane Katrina resulted in flooding of the HIV medical care clinics operated by N’R Peace, Inc. (Applicant) and destruction of Applicant’s case management files.    The files, which contained patient medical data necessary for the operation of the organization, were completely destroyed.  In December 2005, FEMA obligated funds, totaling $105,600, to recreate the records in PW 1676.  The Applicant requested additional funding.  FEMA determined that the Applicant’s request and the original obligated amount were ineligible because there was no data in the medical records that could be salvaged or stabilized.  In the first appeal, the Applicant asserted that FEMA did not notify it that the work and labor costs associated with the completed work were ineligible until six years after the work was completed.  The Applicant noted that it worked closely with FEMA during the restoration process and submitted documents requested by FEMA.  Accordingly, the Applicant requested $385,000 in FEMA funding for force account labor, purchased items, and items yet to be purchased.  The Regional Administrator granted the appeal with regard to the materials and supplies that the Applicant lost relative to the medial records but denied it with regard to the labor costs associated with recreating the medical records.  In the second appeal, the Applicant contends that it has not received any of the $385,000 that it requested in the first appeal.  This amount includes the $105,600 in force account labor costs that FEMA de-obligated, an additional $105,000 for force account labor associated with restoring the medical files, and costs related to materials and supplies.  Moreover, the Applicant asserts that the force account labor associated with the recreation of its medical records is eligible for FEMA funding.  FEMA obligated funding for supplies and materials in PW 1733. 

Issues:   1.   Are labor costs associated with the restoring of data in patient records eligible for FEMA funding?

                2.  May FEMA de-obligate funds after the Applicant has completed the work that was approved by FEMA and for which the funds were initially obligated?

Findings:   1. No.

                   2. Yes.

Rationale:  44 CFR §206.226, Restoration of damaged facilities, Response and Recovery Policy (RRP) 9524.6, Collections and Individual Objects, dated August 17, 1999; 44 CFR 13.22(b), Allowable costs, OMB Circular A-87, Attachment A (Section C), dated May 10, 2004.


 

 

Appeal Letter

December 19, 2013

Kevin Davis
Director
Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness
7667 Independence Boulevard
Baton Rouge, LA 70806

Re:  Second Appeal–N’R Peace, Inc., PA ID 071-UZZ5M-00, Document Restoration, FEMA-1603-DR-LA, Project Worksheet (PW) 1676

Dear Mr. Davis:

This is in response to a letter from your office dated June 10, 2013, which transmitted the referenced second appeal on behalf of N’R Peace, Inc. (Applicant).  The Applicant is appealing the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) denial of $385,000 in costs associated with restoring medical records destroyed as a result of Hurricane Katrina.

As explained in the enclosed analysis, FEMA is not authorized to fund the work associated with recreating data contained in records of any kind.  Therefore, I am denying the Applicant’s appeal. 

Please inform the Applicant of my decision. This determination is the final decision on this matter pursuant to 44 CFR §206.206, Appeals.

Sincerely,

/s/

Deborah Ingram
Assistant Administrator
Recovery Directorate

Enclosure

cc:  George A. Robinson
       Regional Administrator
       FEMA Region VI

Appeal Analysis

Background

Hurricane Katrina resulted in the flooding of HIV medical care clinics operated by N’R Peace, Inc. (Applicant) and destruction of Applicant’s case management files.  These files included essential patient information, including HIV/AIDS status, residency verification, income verification, lab work, and nurse notes.  This data was housed in paper files only.  The Applicant determined the cost to recreate these medical files by estimating the time an average staff member needed to restore each record.  The Applicant estimated that it would require three staff members on average 12 months to complete the restoration.  The average annual salary of the staff members is $31,500, plus 26 percent fringe benefits.  FEMA prepared Project Worksheet (PW) 1676 on December 13, 2005, in the amount of $105,600 and prepared Version 1 on the same day to increase the Federal share.  FEMA also obligated funds, in the amount of $46,260 to replace destroyed contents in PW 1733, based on an estimated value of these contents by researching prices at Office Max, Office Depot, and other medical supply stores.  FEMA held a meeting on August 17, 2011, at the request of the Applicant and the Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (Grantee), at which the Applicant requested an additional $105,000 in funding to recreate its medical files.  During this meeting, FEMA determined that the Applicant’s request for additional funding and the original obligated amount were ineligible for Public Assistance funding because there was no data in the medical files that could be salvaged or stabilized.  In January 2012, FEMA prepared Version 2 to PW 1676 de-obligating the full amount, $105,600, previously awarded to the Applicant.

First Appeal

The Applicant submitted a first appeal to the Grantee on March 8, 2012.  With the appeal, the Applicant requested reimbursement of $385,000, or 85% of the expenses incurred, including force account labor, purchased items, and items yet to be purchased.  This amount includes the original $105,600 that FEMA obligated in PW 1676, the additional $105,000 that the Applicant requested in the August 2011 meeting, and costs to cover materials and supplies (contents).  The Applicant asserted that, in response to being recognized as a HIV and AIDS organization, FEMA approached it as a private non-profit (PNP) organization that was eligible for FEMA funding.  Further, the Applicant claimed that throughout the process of completing the initial stages of records recovery, it was in constant communication with FEMA and was never advised that the work was ineligible for FEMA funding.  Finally, the Applicant stated that it routinely submitted “Justification of Documents and Services” forms requested by FEMA.

On January 25, 2013, the FEMA Region VI Regional Administrator (RA) partially approved the first appeal with a letter explaining that replacing the materials and supplies (contents) that the Applicant lost relative to the records were eligible for funding; however, the RA did not specify the eligible amount for contents.  The RA denied the Applicant’s request for labor costs associated with recreating the medical records, stating “the destroyed medical records… were unique and not eligible for restoration.”

Second Appeal

The Applicant submitted a second appeal on April 8, 2013, which the Grantee transmitted to FEMA on June 10, 2013.  In the second appeal, the Applicant again requests reimbursement of $385,000, including force account labor, purchased items, and items yet to be purchased and reiterates its position from its first appeal.  The Applicant asserts that replacing the data in the medical files was essential to the operation of the organization because of the uniqueness of the organization’s structure and services provided.  In addition, the Grantee states that the medical records could not be stabilized because the hard copy files had been under water for more than four weeks and were no longer readable. The Applicant also contends that the medical files were destroyed, but limited data for the number of encounters were documented and reported in quarterly and annual reports.  Finally, the Applicant argues that, for six years, FEMA misled it regarding the eligibility of the work.  In doing so, the Applicant finished the project in “good faith,” which has now resulted in its financial devastation.

Discussion

Eligibility of Document Restoration

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act) Section 406(c)(2), implemented by Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR) §206.226, Restoration of damaged facilities, authorizes FEMA to make contributions to a person that owns and operates an eligible PNP facility for the repair, restoration, reconstruction, or replacement of the facility damaged or destroyed by a major disaster.  A building, including its contents, is an eligible facility.

At the time of the incident, there was no FEMA guidance that specifically addressed document restoration.  Response and Recovery Policy (RRP) 9524.6, Collections and Individual Objects, dated August 17, 1999 addresses the eligibility of restoration and stabilization of certain items with an intangible value.  The policy states that FEMA assistance may be used to prolong the existence of, maintain the integrity of, and minimize deterioration of the collection or object.  However, collections or objects that have been completely destroyed by the disaster will not receive any FEMA assistance due to their uniqueness and intangible value. While the policy does not address medical records specifically, the same analysis applies to the eligibility of medical records due to the uniqueness and intangible value of medical records.  Medical records, by their very nature, are unique because the data contained therein is patient-specific.  The Applicant asserts that HIV/AIDS status, income verification, residency, and other data that was unique to each patient were essential to the mission and function of the organization.  This data is distinguishable from contents, such as equipment, furnishings, library books and publications, where comparable items can be acquired and FEMA assistance is available.

In its Appeal Analysis, the Grantee argues that that the Applicant relied on Disaster Assistance Policy (DAP) 9525.16, Research-related Equipment and Furnishings, dated April 30, 2007, which states photocopying and scanning damaged hardcopies in order to re-establish files is eligible work.  It is important to note that this guidance was issued after the disaster event.  In addition, PW 1676 states that, “the medical records were destroyed and lost, and there is no information that can be salvaged or restored.”  Accordingly, even if DAP9525.16 had been issued prior to the disaster, it would not apply because the files were completely destroyed, not merely damaged, but salvageable.

FEMA obligated $105,600 for force account labor to complete the data recovery process.  However, only labor costs associated with eligible work are eligible for reimbursement by FEMA.  Here, recreating data in medical records is not eligible work; therefore, the labor costs associated with such work is ineligible. 

De-obligation of Funds

The Applicant asserts that FEMA de-obligated funds after it approved the Applicant’s project, the medical files were recreated and costs incurred.  The Applicant asserts that it should not be held liable for errors made by FEMA representatives because it proceeded with the project in “good faith.”  Substantive requirements of the Public Assistance program are established in the Stafford Act, 44 CFR, and FEMA Public Assistance policies outlined in published sources.  The statute, regulations, and polices allow fixed, predictable standards for determining if expenditures are authorized for reimbursement under the Public Assistance program.  Public Assistance funding is not guaranteed if documented eligibility criteria are not met; regardless of erroneous application of policy during preparation of a PW.  

Conclusion

The provision of funding under the Public Assistance program for restoring medical files is not authorized by the Stafford Act or 44 CFR.  Therefore, the labor costs associated with restoring medical files are not eligible.  The cost for materials and supplies associated with restoring the files remains eligible.  PW 1733 provides $46,260 for contents.  The Applicant should submit all documentation in support of its total cost claimed for contents with its request to close out PW 1733.