^T603Zo7ADRmLl°rden' **SPeCia,iS, Pr°jeCt"""^D»*«b"«N°:**• Academy,B.dg.A PW#11604 Parish: St. Bernard Record of Environmental Consideration REVISED FOR FEMA ENVIRONMENTAL -LOUISIANA -2006 See 44 Code of Federal Regulation Part 10 Project Name/Number: Nova Academy, Bldg. A/ PW# 11604 FIPS#087-04449-00 Project Location: 7200 Alexander Ave., Arabi, LA 70032 Latitude: 29.95851, Longitude: -89.99899 Project Description: Heavy rains and high winds from Hurricane Katrina (DR-1603) caused significant exterior and interior damage to Nova Academy, Bldg. Aof the St. Bernard Parish School Board. This pw reimburses the eligible applicant for replacement of the building within the existing footprint. The new building will be replaced according to codes and standards upgrades including elevation to the ABFE. All work will be performed in apreviously disturbed area with no indication of nearby waterways orotherbodiesof water. Documentation Requirements • (Short version) All consultation and agreements implemented to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, and Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 12898 are completed and no other laws apply (Review Concluded) yy J' M (Long version) All applicable laws and executive orders were reviewed. Additional information for compliance is attached to this REC and/or included in project files, as applicable. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Determination • Statutorily excluded from NEPA review. (Review Concluded) D Programmatic Categorical Exclusion -Category (Reference PCE in comments) (Review Concluded) U Categorical Exclusion -Category D No Extraordinary Circumstances exist. Are project conditions required? • Yes (see section V) Q No (Review Concluded) • Extraordinary Circumstances exist (See Section IV). • Extraordinary Circumstances mitigated. (See Section IV comments) Are project conditions required? • Yes (see section V) • No (Review Concluded) U EnvironmentalAssessment D Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Reference EA or PEA in comments) K Environmental Impact Statement Comments: This project meets the criteria for the alternative arrangement, permanent school, type of project This project has conditions and requires mitigation under the other EHP laws. Reviewer and Approvals • Project is Non-Compliant (See attached documentation justifying selection). FEMA Environmental Reviewer: Name: Adam BordenvteMA-Environmental Specialist Signature ; F-v_ cf^WA^---^ Date Record ofEnvironmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) iss^sa^ss^'Env-Spec • project N-me/Env-Dat-b-se No=n-A<»d-* •«•• a PW#1I604 irpn* * r. • „ . Parish: St. Bernard *fcMA Regional Environmental Officer orDelegated Approving Official: Name: Howard R. Bush, Environmental Liason Officer --Date #.-*•<><* Compliance Review for Environmental Laws father than NEPA) A. National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) P Not type ofactivity with potential to affect historic properties. • Activity meets Programmatic Agreement, December 3, 2004. Appendix A: Are project conditions required? • Yes (see Section V) D No • Programmatic Agreement not applicable, must conduct standard Section 106 Review. HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES DNo historic properties that are listed or 45/50 years or older in project area. (Review Concluded) IS Building or structure listed or 45/50 years or older in project area and activity not exempt from review IS Determination ofNo Historic Properties Affected (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required? g| Yes (see Section V) [j No (Review Concluded) U Determination of Historic Properties Affected (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) • Property aNational Historic Landmark and National Park Service was provided early notification during the consultation process. Ifnot, explain incomments D No Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file). Are project conditions required? fj Yes (see Section V) Q No (Review Concluded) D Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) • Resolution of Adverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) Are project conditions required Q Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES S Project affects only previously disturbed ground. (Review Concluded) LJ Project affects undisturbed ground. • Project area has no potential for presence of archeological resources • Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence or consultation on file). (Review Concluded) • Project area has potential for presence of archeological resources • Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required Q Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) LJ Determination of historic properties affected • NR eligible resources not present (FEMA finding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file). Are project conditions required LjYes (see Section V) Q No (Review Concluded) U NR eligible resources present in project area. (FEMA finding/ SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) • No Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA finding/ SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required? [j Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) • Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA finding/ SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) • Resolution of Adverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) Are project conditions required? [J Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) Comments: FEMA, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), has determined that none of the structures associated with the proposed demolition are listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (seeattachedcorrespondencedated01/26/2006)andfinds thatthisscopeofworkwillhavenoeffectonstandinghistoric properties. Scope ofwork indicates ground disturbing activities associated with the demolition and rebuild of the structure within its pre-disaster footprint. Upon consultation of SHPO data, there is aknown archaeological sites within .5 miles of Record ofEnvironmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) 2 vltT,r^!LA^m. BOrde"' E"V-SPecialU« Project Name/Env. Database No: Nova Academy, Bldg. A FEMA-1603/1607-DR-LA PW#11604 Parish: St. Bernard the project area. Demolition must follow the lower impact demolition stipulations &additional protocols which are attached. The stipulations and protocols should be explicit in the demolition contract. Failure to comply with these stipulations &additional protocols will jeopardize receipt of federal funding. If during the course of work, archaeological artifacts (prehistoric or historic) or human remains are discovered, the applicant shall stop work in the vicinity of the discovery and take all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the finds. The applicant shall inform their Public Assistance (PA) contacts at FEMA, who will in turn contact FEMA Historic Preservation staff. The applicant will not proceed with work until FEMA historic preservation staff have completed consultation with the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In addition, ifunmarked graves are present, compliance with the Louisiana Unmarked Human Burial Sites Preservation Act (R.S. 8:671 et seq.) is required. The applicant shall notify the law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction where the remains are located within twenty-four hours of the discovery. The applicant shall also notify FEMA and the Louisiana Unmarked Burial Sites Board (call the Louisiana Division of Archeology at 225-342-8170) within seventy-two hours of the discovery. Ifthis scope of work and/or the footprint/location of the new building changes this project will need to be resubmitted for further Section 106 review prior to ground disturbing activities taking place outside ofthe pre-disasterfootprint ofthe building. Correspondence/Consultation/References: NHPA effect determinations made by V. Gomez FEMA Historic Preservation Specialist and Katherine Zeringue, FEMA Historic Preservation Specialist/Archaeologist B. Endangered Species Act S No listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action (Review Concluded) • Listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in the areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. Q No effect to species or designated critical habitat. (See comments for justification) Are project conditions required? • Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) • May affect, but not likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat (FEMA determination/USFWS/NMFS concurrence onfile) (Review Concluded) Are project conditions required? • Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) • Likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat • Formal consultation concluded. (Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion on file) Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: Project is located in an urban or previously developed area. Neither listed species nor their habitat occur in or near this site, thus FEMA finds there will be no effect to threatened or endangered species. Correspondence/ConsultatiowReferences: USFWS emergency consultation provisions determined in letters dated September 15, 2005 for Katrina. C. Coastal Barrier Resources Act E3 Project is not on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area (Review Concluded). • Project is on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area. (FEMA determination/USFWS consultation on file) • Proposed action an exception under Section 3505.a.6 (Review Concluded) • Proposed action not excepted under Section 3505.a.6. Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: Project is not within a CBRA zone. Correspondence/Consultation/References: Louisiana Coastal Barrier Resource System Maps referenced 08/09/06. D. Clean Water Act 13Project would not affect any waters ofthe U.S. (Review Concluded) • Project would affect waters, including wetlands, ofthe U.S. Q Project exempted as in kind replacement or other exemption. (Review Concluded) • Project requires Section 404/401/or Section 9/10 (Rivers and Harbors Act) permit, including qualification under Nationwide Permits. Are project conditions required? Q YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: No jurisdictional waters ofthe U.S., including wetlands, occur in or near the project area. Record of Environmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) SSf^S,^ f°rden' E"V-SpeCiali,, Pro'ect Nam^"v. Database No: Nov. Academy, Bldg. A FEMA-1603/1607-DR-LA PW#11604 Parish: St. Bernard Correspondence/Consultation/References: USFWS National Wetlands Inventory map (http://www.fws.gov/nwi/) queried on 08/09/06 ^ E. Coastal Zone Management Act D Project is not located in acoastal zone area and does not affect acoastal zone area (Review concluded) ^ Project is located in a coastal zone area and/or affects the coastal zone ^ State administering agency does not require consistency review. (Review Concluded). LJ State administering agency requires consistency review. Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: This project is located within the Louisiana Coastal Management Zone. LA Department ofNatural Resources (DNR) has determined that receipt of federal assistance is consistent with the Louisiana Coastal Resource Program. Projects within the coastal zone may still require acoastal use permit or other authorization from DNR. Projects may be coordinated bycontactingLADNRat 1-800-276-4019. Correspondence/Consultation/References: LDNR Louisiana Coastal Zone map 2002. F. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act E3 Projectdoesnotaffect,control, ormodifyawaterway/bodyofwater. (Review Concluded) • Project affects controls or modifies awaterway/body ofwater. • Coordination with USFWS conducted • No Recommendations offered by USFWS. (Review Concluded) • Recommendations provided by USFWS. Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: No streams or water bodies are located in ornear the project area. Correspondence/Consultation/References: Louisiana Map (http://wwwlamap.doa.louisiana.gov/) queried 08/09/06. G. Clean Air Act • Project will not result in permanent air emissions. (Review Concluded) IS Project is located in an attainment area. (Review Concluded) LJ Project is located in a non-attainment area. LJ Coordination required with applicable state administering agency. Are project conditions required? • YES (see section V) Q NO (Review Concluded) Comments: This project involves the demolition or renovation ofapublic structure. Regardless ofthe asbestos content, the applicant is responsible for ensuring that renovation or demolition activities are coordinated with the Louisiana DepartmentofEnvironmental Quality (LDEQ) in accordance with the LDEQ "Sixth Amended Declaration ofEmergency and Administrative Order" dated March 31, 2006, and the LESHAP protocol dated March 1, 2006, incorporating the provisions ofEPA's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 33.HI.5151 and Chapter 27. Should Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) be present at the project site, the applicant is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced administrative orders. Correspondence/Consultation/References: EPA Region 6Non-attainment Map. H. Farmland Protection Policy Act El Project does not affect designated prime or unique farmland. (Review Concluded) • Project causes unnecessary or irreversible conversion of designated prime or unique farmland. • Coordination with Natural Resource Conservation Commission required. • Farmland Conversion Impact Rating, Form AD-1006, completed. Are project conditions required? Q YES (see section V) [J NO (Review Concluded) Comments: The project site is in adeveloped urbanized area and Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) is precluded. No primeoruniquefarmland present. Correspondence/Consultation/References: National Resource Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvev.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ Referenced 08/09/06. Record ofEnvironmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) r™??™™^^1? ?°rde"' EnV" Sp'Ci""St Pr°Ject N«e/Env. Database No: Nova Academy, Bldg. A FEMA-1603/I607-DR-LA PW#11604 Parish: St. Bernard I. Migratory Bird Treaty Act D Project not located within aflyway zone. (Review Concluded) [X] Project located within aflyway zone. ^ Project does not have potential to take migratory birds. (Review Concluded) Are project conditions required? • Yes (see section V) E3 No (Review Concluded) • Project has potential to take migratory birds. • Contact made with USFWS Are project conditions required? • YES (see section V) Q NO (Review Concluded) Comments: The site is an existing disturbed area with little value to migratory birds and would not be included in the USFWS migratory birdmanagement program. Correspondence/Consultation/References: USFWS guidance letter dated September 15, 2005 for Katrina J. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act ^ Project not located in ornear Essential Fish Habitat. (Review Concluded) • Project located in ornear Essential Fish Habitat. • Project does not adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat. (Review Concluded) Are project conditions required? • Yes (see Section V) f_J No (Review Concluded) • Project adversely affects Essential Fish Habitat (FEMA determination/USFWS/NMFS concurrence on file) • NOAA Fisheries provided no recommendation(s) (Review Concluded). Are project conditions required? • Yes (see Section V) • No (Review Concluded) LJ NOAA Fisheries provided recommendation(s) • Written reply to NOAA Fisheries recommendations completed. Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) LJ NO (Review Concluded) Comments: Project is not located in or near any surface waters with the potential to affect EFH species. Correspondence/Consultation/References: Louisiana Map (http://wwwlamap.doa.louisiana.gov/) referenced 08/09/06. K. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act E3 Project is not along and does not affect Wild or Scenic River (WSR) -(Review Concluded) • Project is along oraffects WSR • Project adversely affects WSR as determined by NPS/USFS. FEMA cannot fund the action. (NPS/USFS/USFWS/BLM consultation on file) (Review Concluded) • Project does not adversely affect WSR. (NPS/USFS/USFWS/BLM consultation on file) Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: None Correspondence/Consultation/References: National Wild and Scenic Rivers http://www.nps.gov/rivers/wildriverslist.html. referenced 08/09/06 . L. Other Relevant Laws and Environmental Regulations State Hazardous Materials and Solid Waste Laws Comments: -In accordance with the Formosan Termite Initiative Act, (LA R.S. 3:3391.1 thru 3391.13) the Louisiana parishes ofCalcasieu, Cameron, Jefferson Davis, Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa and Washington are under quarantine. The movement ofwood or cellulose material, temporary housing or architectural components (e.g. beams, doors and other wood salvaged from astructure) may not leave the quarantined parishes without written authorization from the commissioner ofthe Louisiana Department ofAgriculture and forestryor his designee(s). -Removal and disposal ofdebris containing household hazardous waste and certain categories ofliquid wastes must be performed in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, executive orders and guidelines. LAC title 33 part VII requires that specified items, including lead acid batteries, used oil filters, used motor oil, scrap tires, cfc's (refrigerants), radioactive waste orregulated infectious wastes must be segregated from and excluded from non-hazardous Record of Environmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) EESSMSSJ"**'^SPeCia,iSt **«""«*•* D"»b»" N»= N-a Ac.demy, Bldg.A PWS11604 Parish: St. Bernard debris collection, staging, processing and disposal sites. Failure to comply with applicable legal requirements in debris collection and/or disposal operations will jeopardize federal funding. The clean-up or restoration/repair of sites damaged as aresult ofsuch operations are ineligible for federal funding. Previously obligated funding is subject to de-obligation ifa determination of ineligibility is made. -Lead-Based Paint-this project involves the demolition ofapublic structure that may contain surfaces coated with Lead- Based Paint (LBP). Activities involving abrading (sanding, scraping, etc.), heating, stripping, or otherwise concentratingLBPshallcomplywithapplicableprovisionsof29CFRparts1910and 1926(OSHA-workersafety),and40CFR260 through 268 (EPA -hazardous waste). The applicant is responsible for ensuring that project activities are coordinated with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality for abatement activities and is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced regulations. II. Compliance Review for Executive Orders A. E.0.11988 -Floodplains D No Effect on Floodplains/Flood levels and project outside Fioodplain -(Review Concluded) ^ Located in Fioodplain or Effects on Floodplains/Flood levels E3 No adverse effect on fioodplain and not adversely affected by the fioodplain. (Review Concluded). Are project conditions required? ^ Yes (see Section V) LJ No (Review Concluded) • Beneficial Effect on Fioodplain Occupancy/Values (Review Concluded). • Possible adverse effects associated with investment in fioodplain, occupancy or modification of fioodplain environment LJ 8Step Process Complete -documentation on file Are project conditions required? D YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: The site is located in Zone AB. http://store.msc.fema. gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/FemaWelcomeView?storeId=10001&catalogId=10001 &langld=-1, The St. Bernard parish enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) on 03-13-70. Per Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel number 2252040280C, dated 03-04-87, project is located in zone "B", area protected from 100-yr flood by levee, dike, or other structure subject to failure or overtopping during larger floods. Project is replacement of building,equipment, and components. All new construction must coordinate and comply with local fioodplain ordinances and be built to codes, standards and must be elevated to or above advisory base flood elevations. A. Cramer FPM Specialist Correspondence/Consultation/References: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No #2252040280C B. E.0.11990-Wetlands j|jNo Effects on Wetland(s) and project located outside Wetland(s)-(Review Concluded) • Located in Wetland or effects Wetland(s) • Beneficial Effect on Wetland -(Review Concluded) • Possible adverse effect associated with constructing in or near wetland • Review completed as part offioodplain review • 8Step Process Complete -documentation on file Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Comments: No wetlands were observed during site visit or determined to be present by checking the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps. Correspondence/Consultation/References: USFWS NWI map accessed on-line (http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html)08/09/06. C. E.0.12898 -Environmental Justice for Low Income and Minority Populations p3 No Low income or minority population in, near or affected by the project -(Review Concluded) • Low income or minority population in or near project area D No disproportionately high and adverse impact on low income or minority population-(Review Concluded) • Disproportionately high or adverse effects on low income or minority population Are project conditions required? • YES (see Section V) • NO (Review Concluded) Record ofEnvironmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) 6 Reviewer Name: Adam Borden, Env. Specialist Project Name/Env. Database No: Nova Academy, Bldg. A FEMA-I603/1607-DR-LA PW#11604 Parish: St. Bernard Comments: No Environmental Justice issues identified. mS^^ US' CCnSUS blU"eaU 200° ^ at htfe^factfinder.cenS„s pnv referenced HI. Other Environmental Issues Identify other potential environmental concerns in the comment box not clearly falling under alaw or executive order (see environmental concerns scoping checklist for guidance). State Hazardous Materials andSolid Waste Laws " ZZZe"tSf:r !" aCC°rdrfnCe wjth/he Formosan Termite Initiative Act, (LA R.S. 3:3391.1 thru 3391.13) the Louisiana Ctx ' ?mer0nu Jeffei;SOn DaviS> °rleanS' JefferSon' Pla1uemil"*> St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa and Washington are under quarantine. The movement of wood or cellulose material temporary housing or architectural components (e.g. beams, doors and other wood salvaged from astructure) may not le'ave ^ft^hbd^STWltten aUth0riZati°n fr°m ^COmmiSSi°ner °fthC L°Uisiana Department of Agriculture -Removal anddisposalofdebriscontaininghouseholdhazardouswasteandcertaincategoriesofliquidwastesmust be ?^Tvnn aCC°rdTe W'th aU !PpHcable federal and state laws> nidations, executive orders and guidelines. LAC title 33 part VII requires that specified items, including lead acid batteries, used oil filters, used motor oil, scrap tires cfc's (refrigerants) radioactive waste or regulated infectious wastes must be segregated from and excluded from non-hazardous debris collection staging processing and disposal sites. Failure to comply with applicable legal requirements in debris collection and/or disposal operations will jeopardize federal funding. The clean-up or restoration/repair of sites damaged as aresult ofsuch operations are ineligible for federal funding. Previously obligated funding is subject to de-obligation ifa determination of ineligibility is made. ^tSTSS"^XS^ inV,°IVeS the demolition ofaPublic^cture that may contain surfaces coated with Lead fRp1.Tr, 2? £ TmV m§abradin8(Sanding' SCraping' etc)' heatin8> stripping' oroth^iseconcentrating rif. mS!Wu ^ Pr°V1S10nS °f29 CFR partS 191° md 1926 (0SHA •worker safety). ^d 40 CFR 260 through 268 (EPA -hazardous waste). The applicant is responsible for ensuring that project activities are coordinated with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality for abatement activities and is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced regulations. Correspondence/Consultation/Reference: IV. Extraordinary Circumstances Based on the review of compliance with other environmental laws and Executive Orders, and in consideration of other environmental factors, review the project for extraordinary circumstances. *uA ,TuS" UnC!er any circumstance may recIuire a" Environmental Assessment (EA) with the exception of (ii) which should be applied mconjunction with controversy on an environmental issue. If the circumstance can be mitigated pleaseexplainincomments. Ifno, leaveblank. Yes • (i) Greater scope or size than normally experienced for aparticular category of action • (ii) Actions with ahigh level ofpublic controversy • (iii) Potential for degradation, even though slight, of already existing poor environmental conditions; • (iv) Employment of unproven technology with potential adverse effects or actions involving unique or unknown environmental risks; • (v) Presence of endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat, or archaeological cultural, historical or other protected resources; Record ofEnvironmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) Reviewer Name: Adam Borden, Env. Specialist P,„i , u -„ t FEMA-1603/1607-DR-LA Pr0JeCt Name/Env-Database No: Nova Academy, Bldg. A PW#U604 D (vi) Presence ofhazardous or toxic substances at levels which exceed Federal, state or local regulations or standards requiring action or attention; • (vii) Actions with the potential to affect special status areas adversely or other critical resources such as wetlands, coastal zones, wildlife refuge and wilderness areas, wild and scenic rivers sole or principal drinking water aquifers; D (viii) Potential for adverse effects on health or safety; and U (ix) Potential to violate afederal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment. • (x) Potential for significant cumulative impact when the proposed action is combined with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions, even though the impacts of the proposed action may not be significant by themselves. Comments: None V. Environmental Review Project Conditions Project Conditions: The following conditions apply asacondition ofFEMA funding reimbursement: ' ISSSS. inV°lve?!hefdemolition°rrenovation°fapublicstructure. Regardlessoftheasbestoscontent,the DenZlnt fP TT1,8 *?ren°Vati0n °r dem°Hti0n aCtivities are coordinat^ with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) in accordance with the LDEQ "Fifth Amended Declaration of Emergency and Administrative Order" dated March 31, 2006, and the LESHAP protocol dated March 12006 incorporating the provisions of EPA's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and AC^ (ACMs) be present at the project site, the applicant is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced administrative orders. wsposai in accordance • In accordance with the Formosan Termite Initiative Act, (LA R.S. 3:3391.1 thru 3391.13) the Louisiana parishes of Calcasieu Cameron, Jefferson Davis Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. JolmTe Baptist St. Tammany, Tangipahoa and Washington are under quarantine. The movement of wood or cellulose ™enal, temporary housing or architectural components (e.g. beams, doors and other wood salvaged from a tructure) may not leave the quarantined parishes without written authorization from the commissioner of the Louisiana Department ofAgriculture and forestry or his designee(s) • Removal and disposal of debris containing household hazardous waste and certain categories of liquid wastes must SSSSS^TtS"tI1 aPPlrC!!"e fCderal 3nd StatC ,3WS' regUlati°nS' executive orders a«d3ZT LAC title 33 part VII requires that specified items, including lead acid batteries, used oil filters, used motor oil scrap tires cfc s(refrigerants), radioactive waste or regulated infectious wastes must be segregated from and ' t^Urt r "on-hazardousdebris Election, staging, processing and disposal sites. Failure to comply with applicable legal requirements in debris collection and/or disposal operations will jeopardize federal funding The clean-uporrestoration/repairofsitesdamaged asaresultofsuchoperations are ineligible forfederal funding Previously obligated funding is subject to de-obligation ifadetermination ofineligibility is made ' uldtZd IX HRpff? v"01"65 ?e dTHti0n °f3PUb'iC StrUCtUre that ^ contain surfaces <™ted with vr°lrtahTading (S3ndlng' SCraping' etC)> heati*S> striP?ing' or ^herwise c^STSpS;concentratmg LBP shall comply, with applicable provisions of29 CFR parts 1910 and 1926 (OSHA -worker sfty), and 40 CFR 260 through 268 (EPA -hazardous waste). The applicant is responsible for ensuring that project activities are coordinated with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality for abatement activities and is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced regulations • Demolition must follow the lower impact demolition stipulations &additional protocols which are attached The adSSTJSPr.°t0CtSh°US^eXP,iCitlnthedem0Hti0nC°ntraCt-Fdluret0comp,ywJththesesttputtil & addttional protocols will jeopardize receipt of federal funding. If during the course of work, archaeological artifacts (prehistoric or historic) or human remains are discovered, the applicant shall stop work in the vicinity of the discovery and take all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the finds. The applicant shall nform their Public Assmance (PA) contacts at FEMA, who will in turn contact FEMA Historic PreseLfion staff The applicant will not proceed with work until FEMA Historic Preservation staffhave completed constat on wS the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In addition, if unmarked graves are present cSiS* with the Louisiana Unmarked Human Burial Sites Preservation Act (R.S. 8:671 et seq.) is required The applicant Record ofEnvironmental Consideration (Version 08/09/06) Reviewer Name: Adam Borden, Env. Specialist FEMA-1603/1607-DR-LA ProJect Name/Env. Database No: Nova Academy, Bldg. A PW#11604 floodelevations *""""C°deS'!U,,,Jardsandmustbe='««»»oraboveadvisorybase Record of Environmental Consideration (Version OS/09/06)