Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicant: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergencylProgramJProject Title: DR 1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 Goghill Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

Record of Environmental Consideration 


See 44 Code of Federal Regulation Part 10. 

Project NamelNumber: E0R3326 Goghill Elementary School-Modular Classroom / PW 15038 

Project Location: 5500 Piety Drive, New Orleans, Louisiana, Orleans Parish 70126 (N30.01612, W90.03869) 


Project Description: Project scope of work includes restoring the facility to its pre-disaster condition 
and upgrading to current codes and standards. Project activities consist ofremoving and replacing a 
modular classroom building including the foundation piers. 

Documentation Requirements 

D No Documentation Required <Review Concluded) 

D (Short version) All consultation and agreements implemented to comply with the National 
Historic Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, and Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 
12898 are completed and no other laws apply. <Review Concluded) 

[8j (Long version) All applicable laws and executive orders were reviewed. Additional information 
for compliance is attached to this REC. 

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPAl Determination 

D Statutorily excluded from NEP A review. <Review Concluded) 
[8j Programmatic Categorical Exclusion -Category (xv) <Review Concluded) 
D Categorical Exclusion -Category

D No Extraordinary Circumstances exist. 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 
D Extraordinary Circumstances exist (See Section IV). 
D Extraordinary Circumstances mitigated. (See Section IV comments) 

Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D Environmental Assessment 
D Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Reference EA or PEA in comments) 
D Environmental Impact Statement 

Comments: Refer to Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE)-Restoration and/or Improvement ofInternal Facility 
Systems or Components and PCE-Restoration and/or Improvement of External Systems or Components dated 09/0112005. 
See attached. 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicant: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergencylProgramIProject Title: DRI603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 GoghiII Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

Reviewer and Approvals 

o Project is Non-Compliant (See attached documentation justifying selection). 

FEMA Environmental Reviewer. 
Name: Brandon M. Clark, Environmental Specialist 


Signature ~.V'I\. ~ Date_--=-12=/..:.,:15=/2=0=0.::<...6_........:. 


FEMA Regional Environmental Officer or delegated approving official. 
Name: Howard R. Bush, ELO 


Signature~~ r<? Date _---.:.1=2/~1=51=20=0=6_........:. 


I. Compliance Review for Environmental Laws (other than NEPAl 

A. National Historic Preservation Act 

[81 Not type of activity with potential to affect historic properties. (Review Concluded) 

D Applicable executed Programmatic Agreement Otherwise, conduct standard Section 106 review. 
D Activity meets Programmatic Allowance # ____-;::=;______ 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) No (Review Concluded) 

HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 
[81 No historic properties that are listed or 45/50 years or older in project area. (Review Concluded) 
D Building or structure listed or 45/50 years or older in project area and activity not exempt from review. 

D Determination ofNo Historic Properties Affected (FEMA fmding/SHPOffHPO concurrence on file) 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D Determination of Historic Properties Affected (FEMA fmding/SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) 
D Property a National Historic Landmark and National Park Service was provided early notification 
during the consultation process. Ifnot, explain in comments 
D No Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA fmding/SHPOffHPO concurrence on file). 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA fmding/SHPOffHPO concurrence on file)
D Resolution of Adverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) 
Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 

ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 
[81 Project affects only previously disturbed ground. (Review Concluded) 
D Project affects undisturbed ground. 


D Project area has no potential for presence of archeological resources 
D Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA fmding/SHPOffHPO concurrence or 
consultation on file). (Review Concluded) 
D Project area has potential for presence of archeological resources 
D Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA fmding/SHPOffHPO concurrence on file) 
Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D Determination of historic properties affected 
D NR eligible resources not present (FEMA fmding/SHPOffHPO concurrence on file). 
Are project conditions required DYes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D NR eligible resources present in project area. (FEMA fmding/ SHPOffHPO concurrence on 
file) 
D No Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA finding/ SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA fmding/ SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) 
D Resolution of Adverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No 
------_u-fReyiew-C~uded) 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark ApplielDt: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergeDtylProgramlProjeet Title: DR1603LA I HWTicane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 Goghill Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

Comments: 12114/06 -The structures do not meet the 50-year-criterion, nor do they possess the level ofexceptional 
importance required by criteria consideration g ofthe national register guidelines to be considered eligible for the national 
register of historic places. Therefore, the proposed work will have no effect on standing historic properties. Scope ofwork 
indicates ground disturbing activities associated with the demolition and rebuild ofthe modular structures within their predisaster 
footprint only. Upon consultation ofdata provided by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), there are no 
known archaeological sites within.5 miles ofthe project area. Demolition must follow the low impact demolition 
stipulations & additional protocols which are attached. The stipulations and protocols should be explicit in the demolition 
contract. Failure to comply with these stipulations & additional protocols will jeopardize receipt of federal funding. If 
during the course of work, archaeological artifacts (prehistoric or historic) or human remains are discovered, the applicant 
shall stop work in the vicinity ofthe discovery and take all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the finds. The 
applicant shall inform their Public Assistance (PA) contacts at FEMA, who will in turn contact FEMA historic preservation 
staff. The applicant will not proceed with work until FEMA historic preservation staff have completed consultation with the 
Louisiana State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In addition, if unmarked graves are present, compliance with the 
Louisiana Unmarked Human Burial Sites Preservation Act (r.s. 8:611 et seq.) is required. The applicant shall notify the law 
enforcement agency ofthe jurisdiction where the remains are located within twenty-four hours of the discovery. The 
applicant shall also notify FEMA and the Louisiana Unmarked Burial Sites Board (call the Louisiana Division of 
Archeology at 225-342-8170) within seventy-two hours of the discovery. Any changes to the scope, including hazard 
mitigation proposals, and locating ground disturbing activities outside the predisaster location of the building, will require 
resubmittal for review. Dana Linck, Historic Preservation Specialist! Archaeologist 

Co"espondenceiConsultationiReferences: 

B. Endangered Species Act 
~No listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. 
(Review Concluded) 


o Listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in the areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. 

o No effect to species or designated critical habitat. (See comments for justification) 
Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) 
o May affect, but not likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat (FEMA 


determinationlUSFWSINMFS concurrence on file) (Review Concluded) 
Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) 


o Likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat 

o Formal consultation concluded. (Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion on file) 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Co"espondenceiConsultationiReferences: 

C. Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
~Project is not on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area (Review Concluded). 


o Project is on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area. (FEMA determinationlUSFWS consultation on 
file) 

o Proposed action an exception under Section 3505.a.6? (Review Concluded) 
o Proposed action not excepted under Section 3505.a.6. 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO <Review Concluded) 


Comments: None 
Co"espondenceiConsultationiReferences: 

D. Clean Water Act 
~Project would not affect any waters of the U.S. (Review Concluded) 


o Project would affect waters, including wetlands, of the U.S. 

o Project exempted as in kind replacement or other exemption. (Review Concluded) 
o Project requires Section 404/401l0r Section 9/10 (Rivers and Harbors Act) permit, including qualification 
under Nationwide Permits. 
Are ro' ect conditions re uired? 0 YES see section V eview Concluded 


Comments: Project is unlikely to affect waters ofthe United States. 
ondenceiConsultationlB.eferences.;.. 



Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicant: Recovery School District 
DimterlEmergencylProgramIProject Title: DR I603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 Goghill Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

I 

E. Coastal Zone Management Act I

o Project is not located in a coastal zone area and does not affect a coastal zone area (Review concluded) I 

I8l Project is located in a coastal zone area and/or affects the coastal zone tI8l State administering agency does not require consistency review. !Review Concluded). !• 

I ~

o State administering agency requires consistency review. 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) 


Comments: 1211512006 -This project is located within the Louisiana Coastal Management Zone. LA DNR has determined 
that receipt offederal assistance is consistent with the Louisiana Coastal Resource Program. Projects within the coastal 
zone may still require a coastal use permit or other authorization from DNR. Projects may be coordinated by contacting 


I

LA DNR at 1-800-267-4019. Brandon M. Clark, Environmental Specialist 

I 

t

Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

l 

F. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 

I8l Project does not affect, control, or modifY a waterwaylbody ofwater. !Review Concluded) 

o Project affects, controls or modifies a waterwaylbody of water. 

I 

o Coordination with USFWS conducted 

!. 

o No Recommendations offered by USFWS. !Review Concluded) 
o Recommendations provided by USFWS. 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO !Review Concluded) 


Comments: Project is unlikely to affect waters ofthe United States. 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

G. Clean Air Act 

I8l Project will not result in permanent air emissions. !Review Concluded) 

o Project is located in an attainment area. (Review Concluded) 
o Project is located in a non-attainment area. 


o Coordination required with applicable state administering agency .. 
Are ro'ect conditions re uired? 0 YES see section V 0 NO eview Concluded 

Comments: Project will not result in permanent air emissions. 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

H. Farmland Protection Policy Act 

I8l Project does not affect designated prime or unique farmland. (Review Concluded) 

o Project causes unnecessary or irreversible conversion of designated prime or unique farmland. 

o Coordination with Natural Resource Conservation Commission required. 

o Farmland Conversion Impact Rating, Form AD-I 006, completed. 
Are ro'ect conditions re uired? D YES see section V 0 NO eview Concluded 


Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

I. Migratory Bird Treaty Act 

o Project not located within a flyway zone. (Review Concluded) 
I8l Project located within a flyway zone. 

I8l Project does not have potential to take migratory birds. (Review Concluded) 
Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) [2J No (Review Concluded) 

o Project has potential to take migratory birds. 

o Contact made with USFWS 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO !Review Concluded) 

Comments: See letter from Don Fairley to Mr. Russ Watson with USF&WS, dated 09114/2005. Specifically. FEMA has 
determined that restoration projects funded with federal resources will not have adverse impacts on migratory birds or other 
ftsh and wildlife reserves. These determinations are based on the understanding that the conditions outlined in the Louisiana 
Endangered Species Summary are met. 

Correspondence/Consultation/References: http://pacificflyway.govlDocumentslMississippi map.pdf, 


Revi~er Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicant: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergeneylProgramIProject Title: DR1603l.A I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 Goghill Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

J. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

I8l Project not located in or near Essential Fish Habitat. (Review Concluded) 

o Project located in or near Essential Fish Habitat. 

o Project does not adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat. (Review Concluded) 
Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) 
o Project adversely affects Essential Fish Habitat (FEMA determinationlUSFWSINMFS concurrence on file)
o NOAA Fisheries provided no recommendation(s) (Review Concluded), 
Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) 
o NOAA Fisheries provided recommendation(s)






o Written reply to NOAA Fisheries recommendations completed. 
Are ro' ect conditions re uired? 0 YES see section V 0 NO eview Concluded 


Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

I 
I 


I i 

I 


l 
t 
f 

r 

I 

I 


K. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 

I8l Project is not along and does not affect Wild or Scenic River (WSR) -(Review Concluded) 

o Project is along or affects WSR 

o Project adversely affects WSR as determined by NPS/USFS. FEMA cannot fund the action. 
(NPS/uSFS/uSFWSIBLM consultation on file) (Review Concluded) 
o Project does not adversely affect WSR (NPS/uSFSlUSFWSIBLM consultation on file) 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) 


Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

L. Other Relevant Laws and Environmental Regulations 

II. Compliance Review for Executive Orders 

A. E.O. 11988 -Floodplains 

o No Effect on FloodplainslFlood levels and project outside Floodplain -(Review Concluded) 
I8l Located in Floodplain or Effects on FloodplainslFlood levels 

o No adverse effect on floodplain and not adversely affected by the floodplain. (Review Concluded), 
Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) 
o Beneficial Effect on Floodplain OccupancyNalues (Review Concluded), 
I8l Possible adverse effects associated with investment in floodplain, occupancy or modification offloodplain 
environment 


I8l 8 Step Process Complete -documentation on file 
Are project conditions required? I8l YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: 12/14/2006 -The City ofNew Orleans/Orleans Parish enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program 
08/0311970. Per Flood Insurance Rate Map 2252030115 e, dated 03/0111984, project is located in Zone A7 ,area of 100yr 
floodplain, base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. Project is replacement ofmodular building 
(building, equipment, and components) to pre-disaster condition. New construction must coordinate and comply with local 
floodplain ordinance. Applicant is required to coordinate with local floodplain administrator regarding floodplain permit(s) 
prior to the start of any activities. Applicant is responsible for meeting all requirements ofthe permit(s). All coordination 
pertaining to these permit(s), should be documented to the local floodplain administrator and copies provided to LA 
GOHSEP and FEMA as part of the permanent project files. In compliance with EO 11988, a completed 8-step process 
showing considered alternatives is attached. Per 44 CFR 9.1 1 (d)(9), the replacement ofbuilding contents, materials and 
equipment, where possible, disaster proofmg of the building and/or elimination of such future losses by relocation of those 
building contents, materials and equipment to or above the advisory base flood elevation per ABFE maps. Per 44 CFR 9.12, 
applicant must publish a fmal public notice 15 days prior to the start of construction activities. Final public notice is to be 
forwarded to the LA GOHSEP and FEMA for inclusion in the permanent project files. T. Magilke, CFM 

Correspondence/consultation/references: 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applieant: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergeneylProgramlProjeet Title: DR1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 Goghill Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

B. E.O. 11990 -Wetlands 
[81 No Effects on Wetland(s) and project located outside Wetland(s) -(Review Concluded) 
D Located in Wetland or effects Wetland(s)


D Beneficial Effect on Wetland -(Review Concluded) 

o Possible adverse effect associated with constructing in or near wetland 
D Review completed as part of floodplain review 
D 8 Step Process Complete -docwnentation on file 


Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

C. E.O. 12898 -Environmental Justice For Low Income and Minority Populations 
[81 No Low income or minority population in, near or affected by the project -(Review Concluded) 
D Low income or minority population in or near project area 

D No disproportionately high and adverse impact on low income or minority population-(Review Concluded) 
D Disproportionately high or adverse effects on low income or minority population 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

III. Other Environmental Issues 

Identify other potential environmental concerns in the comment box not clearly falling under a law or 
executive order (see environmental concerns scoping checklist for guidance). 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

IV. Extraordinary Circumstances 

Based on the review of compliance with other environmental laws and Executive Orders, and in 
consideration of other environmental factors, review the project for extraordinary circumstances. 

• A "Yes" under any circwnstance may require an Environmental Assessment (EA) with the exception of (ii) which 
should be applied in conjunction with controversy on an environmental issue. If the circumstance can be mitigated, 
please explain in comments. Ifno, leave blank.. 

Yes 
D (i) Greater scope or size than normally experienced for a particular category of action 
D (ii) Actions with a high level of public controversy 
D (iii) Potential for degradation, even though slight, of already existing poor environmental 


conditions; 
D (iv) Employment of unproven technology with potential adverse effects or actions involving 
unique or unknown environmental risks; 
D (v) Presence of endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat, or archaeological, 
cultural, historical or other protected resources; 
D (vi) Presence of hazardous or toxic substances at levels which exceed Federal, state or local 
regulations or standards requiring action or attention; 
D (vii) Actions with the potential to affect special status areas adversely or other critical resources 
such as wetlands, coastal zones, wildlife refuge and wilderness areas, wild and scenic rivers, 

sole or principal drinking water aquifers; 
D (viii) Potential for adverse effects on health or safety; and 
D (ix) Potential to violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the 


.. ___ _ _QrQt~!i.Q1!Qfthe~ll\'il:.O!ll!lent. _____ .. ___ 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicant: Recovery School District 
DlsasterlEmergencylProgramIProj«t Title: DRI60JLA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EORJJ26 GoghiU ElementaJy SchoolModular 
Classroom 

o (x) Potential for significant cwnulative impact when the proposed action is combined with 

other past. present and reasonably foreseeable future actions, even though the impacts ofthe 
proposed action may not be significant by themselves. 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

v. Environmental Review Project Conditions 

Project Conditions: 

I. This project must comply with all conditions ofthe attached Programmatic Categorical Exclusion. 

2. Demolition must follow the lower impact demolition stipulations and additional protocols which 
are attached. The stipulations and protocols should be explicit in the demolition contract. 
Failure to comply with these stipulations and protocols will jeopardize receipt offederal funding. 
If during the course ofwork, archaeological artifacts (prehistoric or historic) or human remains 
are discovered, the applicant shall stop work in the vicinity ofthe discovery and take all 
reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the fmds. The applicant shall inform their 
Public Assistance (PA) contacts at FEMA. who will in turn contact FEMA historic preservation 
staff. The applicant will not proceed with work until FEMA historic preservation staff have 
completed consultation with the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In 
addition, if unmarked graves are present, compliance with the Louisiana Unmarked Human 
Burial Sites Preservation Act (r.s. 8:671 et seq.) is required. The applicant shall notify the law 
enforcement agency ofthe jurisdiction where the remains are located within twenty-four hours of 
the discovery. The applicant shall also notify FEMA and the Louisiana Unmarked Burial Sites 
Board (call the Louisiana division ofArcheology at 225-342-8170) within seventy-two hours of 
the discovery. Failure to comply with these stipulations may jeopardize receipt offema funding. these 
comments are based upon the condition that no changes exist between this pw and the 
approved scope for the initial PW (11369). Any changes to the scope, including hazard 
mitigation proposals, will require resubmittal for review. 
3. New construction must coordinate and comply with local floodplain ordinance. Applicant is 
required to coordinate with local floodplain administrator regarding floodplain permit(s) prior to 
the start ofany activities. Applicant is responsible for meeting all requirements ofthe permit(s). 
All coordination pertaining to these permit(s), should be documented to the local floodplain 
administrator and copies provided to LA GOHSEP and FEMA as part ofthe permanent project 
files. In compliance with EO 11988, a completed 8-step process showing considered alternatives 
is attached. Per 44 CFR 9.1 I (d)(9), the replacement ofbuilding contents, materials and 
equipment, where possible, disaster proofing ofthe building and/or elimination ofsuch future 
losses by relocation ofthose building contents, materials and equipment to or above the advisory 
base flood elevation per ABFE maps. Per 44 CFR 9.12, applicant must publish a final public 
notice 15 days prior to the start ofconstruction activities. Final public notice is to be forwarded 
to the LA GOHSEP and FEMA for inclusion in the permanent project files. 
4. Unusable equipment, debris and material shall be disposed of in an approved manner and 
location. In the event significant items (or evidence thereof) are discovered during 
implementation ofthe project applicant shall handle, manage, and dispose of petroleum products, 
hazardous materials and/or toxic waste in accordance to the requirements and to the satisfaction 
ofthe governing local, state and federal agencies. 
5. Removal and disposal ofdebris containing household hazardous waste and certain categories of 
liquid wastes must be performed in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, 
regulations, executive orders and guidelines. LAC Title 33 Part VII requires that specified 
items, including lead acid batteries, used oil filters, used motor oil, scrap tires, cfc's 
(refrigerants), radioactive waste or regulated infectious wastes must be segregated from and 
excluded from non-hazardous debris collection, staging, processing and disposal sites. 



Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark ApplieaDt: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergeDeylProgramIProjeet Title: DR1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I E0R3326 Goghill Elementary SchoolModular 
Classroom 

6. In accordance with the Fonnosan Tennite Initiative Act, (LA R.S. 3:3391.1 thru 3391.13) the 
Louisiana Parishes ofCalcasieu, Cameron, Jefferson Davis, Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. 
Bernard, St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa and Washington are under 
quarantine. The movement ofwood or cellulose material, temporary housing or architectural 
components (e.g. beams, doors and other wood salvaged from a structure) may not leave the 
quarantined parishes without written authorization from the commissioner of the Louisiana 
Department of Agriculture and Foresti)' or his designee(s). 
7. This project involves the demolition or renovation of a public structure that may contain surfaces 
coated with lead-based paint (LBP). Activities involving abrading (sanding, scraping, etc.), 
heating, stripping, or otherwise concentrating LBP shall comply with applicable provisions of 29 
CFR Parts 1910 and 1926 (OSHA -worker safety), and 40 CFR 260 through 268 (EPAhazardous 
waste). The applicant is responsible for ensuring that renovation or demolition 
activities are coordinated with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality for abatement 
activities and is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously 
referenced regulations. 
8. This project involves the demolition or renovation of a public structure. Regardless of the 
asbestos content, the applicant is responsible for ensuring that renovation or demolition activities 
are coordinated with the Louisiana Department ofEnvironmental Quality (LDEQ) in accordance 
with the LDEQ "Sixth Amended Declaration of emergency and administrative order" dated June 
30, 2006., incorporating the provisions of EPA's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 


I


Pollutants (NESHAP) and the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 33.m.SlSI and Chapter 27. 
Should asbestos containing materials (ACMS) be present at the project site, the applicant is also 
responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced 
administrative order. \ 


9. This project potentially involves the disposal of metallic mercury containing electronic devices. The i 
applicant is responsible for ensuring that these devices are recovered, recycled, reused or sequestered in 
accordance with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) "Declaration of 
Emergency; Mercury-Containing Devices and Electronic Equipment as Universal Waste" letter dated 
October 3, 2005. 

Monitoring Requirements: None