Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Appliuot: Recovery School District 
DisaJterlEmergeoeylProgramIProject Tide: DRl603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elementary 
School-Building C 

Record of Environmental Consideration 


See 44 Code ofFederal Regulation Part 10. 

Project NamelNumber: EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elementary School-Building C I PW 13717 

Project Location: 3519 Trafalgar Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, Orleans Parish 70119 (N29.98831, 

W -90.08088) 

Project Description: Project activities include replacing the facility by the 50% rule under 44 CFR 

206.226(F)2 to restore it to pre-disaster condition, and upgrading the facility to current codes and 

standards. Cumulative project activities include removing and replacing flat roofing, ceiling beams, 

aluminum flashing, gutters, downspouts, flashing, wall framing, block walls, aluminum frame windows, 

sheetrock walls, sinks and lavatories, toilets, ceiling fans, electric water heater, HV AC system, lighting 

fixtures, electrical components, frre alarm systems, wet pipe sprinkler systems, and elevating the 

building three feet. 

Documentation Requirements 

D No Documentation Required <Review Concluded) 

D (Short version) All consultation and agreements implemented to comply with the National Historic 
Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, and Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 12898 are 
completed and no other laws apply. <Review Concluded) 

~ (Long version) All applicable laws and executive orders were reviewed. Additional information for 
compliance is attached to this REC. 

National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Determination 

D Statutorily excluded from NEP A review. (Review Concluded)
D Programmatic Categorical Exclusion -Category <Review Concluded)
D Categorical Exclusion -Category


D No Extraordinary Circumstances exist. 

Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded)

D Extraordinary Circumstances exist (See Section IV). 

D Extraordinary Circumstances mitigated. (See Section IV comments) 

Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded)
D Environmental Assessment 
D Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Reference EA or PEA in comments) 
~ Environmental Impact Statement 

Comments: 8/3112006 -This project meets the criteria for an Alternative Arrangement (Permanent Schools) type of project. 
This project has conditions and requires mitigation under the other Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Laws 
which are listed under the NEP A level of environmental review in the project worksheet. Any changes to this approved scope 
of work will require submission to, and evaluation and approval by, the state and FEMA prior to initiation of any work, for . 
compliance with the national environmental policy act. The applicant is required to obtain and comply with all local, state and 
federal permits and requirements. Non-compliance with the requirements noted above may jeopardize the receipt offederal 
funding. Brandon M. Clark, Environmental Specialist 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applieaat: Recovery School District 
DlsuterlEmergeaeylProgramIProjed Title: DR1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elementary 
School-Building C 

Reviewer and Approvals 

D Project is Non-Compliant (See attached docwnentationjustifying selection). 

FEMA Environmental Reviewer. 
Name: Brandon M. Clark, Environmental Specialist 


Signature'__~~~~~~.L...!....---lm'-!.....!.....:..~C1a.J"""""",=-.:::!=c..__.....!.. Date __OS/31106_---=. 

FEMA Regional Environmental Officer or delegated approving official. 
Name: Howard R. Bush, ELO 

Signature g r;:;l . Date __OS131106_---=. 

I. Compliance Review for Environmental Laws (other than NEPAl 

A. National Historic Presenration Act 

~Not type ofactivity with potential to affect historic properties. <Review Concluded) 
D Applicable executed Programmatic Agreement Otherwise, conduct standard Section 106 review. 
D Activity meets Programmatic Allowance # _____---=::;--__ 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 

HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 
D No historic properties that are listed or 45/50 years or older in project area. (Review Concluded) 
~Building or structure listed or 45/50 years or older in project area and activity not exempt from review. 

~Determination ofNo Historic Properties Affected (FEMA fmdingiSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) 
Are project conditions required? ~Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 
D Determination of Historic Properties Affected (FEMA findingiSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) 
D Property a National Historic Landmark and National Park Service was provided early notification 
during the consultation process. If not, explain in comments 

D No Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA findingiSHPOITHPO concurrence on file). 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 
Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA fmdingiSHPO/THPO concurrence on file) 

D Resolution ofAdverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) 
Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 

ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 
~Project affects only previously disturbed ground. <Review Concluded) 
D Project affects undisturbed ground. 

D Project area has no potential for presence ofarcheological resources 
D Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA findingiSHPOITHPO concurrence or 
consultation on file). <Review Concluded) 
D Project area has potential for presence of archeological resources 
D Determination ofno historic properties affected (FEMA fmdingiSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) 
Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D Determination of historic properties affected 
D NR eligible resources not present (FEMA findingiSHPOITHPO concurrence on file). 

Are project conditions required DYes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) 
D NR eligible resources present in project area. (FEMA fmdingl SHPOITHPO concurrence on 
file) 

D No Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA fmdingl SHPOITHPO concurrence on file) 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 
D Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA fmdingl SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) 
D Resolution ofAdverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark ApplicaDt: Recovery School District 
DisuterlEmergeDcylPrognmIProjed Tide: DR l603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Lan~nHughes Elementary 
School-Building C 

Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) DNo 
<Review Concluded) 

Comments: 8/30/2006 -FEMA, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), has detennined that 

none ofthe structures associated with the proposed demolition are listed on or eligible for the national register of historic 

places (see attached correspondence dated 7/25/2006) and finds that this scope of work will have no effect on standing 

historic properties. Scope of work indicates ground disturbing activities associated with the demolition and rebuild ofthe 

structure within its pre-disaster footprint only. Upon consultation ofdata provided by SHPO, there are no known 
archaeological sites within .5 miles ofthe project area. Demolition must follow the low impact demolition stipulations & 
additional protocols which are attached. The stipulations and protocols should be explicit in the demolition contract. Failure 
to comply with these stipulations & additional protocols will jeopardize receipt of federal funding. If during the course of 
work, archaeological artifacts (prehistoric or historic) or human remains are discovered, the applicant shall stop work in the 
vicinity ofthe discovery and take all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the finds. The applicant shall inform 
their Public Assistance (PA) contacts at FEMA, who will in turn contact FEMA Historic Preservation Staff. The applicant 
will not proceed with work until FEMA Historic Preservation Staff have completed consultation with the Louisiana State 
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In addition, ifunmarked graves are present, compliance with the Louisiana Unmarked 
Human Burial Sites Preservation Act (R.S. 8:671 et seq.) is required. The applicant shall notify the law enforcement agency 
of the jurisdiction where the remains are located within twenty-four hours ofthe discovery. The applicant shall also notify 
FEMA and the Louisiana Unmarked Burial Sites Board (call the Louisiana Division ofArcheology at 225-342-8170) within 
seventy-two hours ofthe discovery. Ifthis scope ofwork and/or the footprint/location ofthe new building changes, this 
project will need to be resubmitted for further Section 106 review prior to ground disturbing activities taking place outside of 
the pre-<iisaster footprint ofthe building. -Valerie Gomez, Historic Preservation Specialist and Katherine Zeringue, Historic 
Preservation Specialist! Archaeologist 

Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

B. Endangered Species Act 

[gI No listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. 
<Review Concluded)
D Listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in the areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. 


D No effect to species or designated critical habitat. (See comments for justification) 

Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded)
D May affect, but not likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat (FEMA 
determinationlUSFWSINMFS concurrence on file) <Review Concluded) 


Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded)
D Likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat 
D Formal consultation concluded. (Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion on file) 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO <Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

C. Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

[gI Project is not on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area <Review Concluded).
D Project is on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area. (FEMA determinationlUSFWS consultation on 


file) 
D Proposed action an exception under Section 3505.a.6? (Review Concluded) 
D Proposed action not excepted under Section 3505.a.6. 


Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO <Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

D. Clean Water Act 

[gI Project would not affect any waters ofthe U.S. (Review Concluded) 

o Project would affect waters, including wetlands, ofthe U.S. 

o Project exempted as in kind replacement or other exemption. (Review Concluded) 

Record ofEnvironmental Consideration 3 08/31/06 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicant: Recovery School District 
DisuterlEmergencylProgramlProject Tide: DRI603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elementary 
School-Building C 

o Project requires Section 404/40 1lor Section 911 0 (Rivers and Harbors Act) pennit, including qualification under 
Nationwide Pennits. 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: Project is not in or adjacent to any waterways ofthe United States. 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

E. Coastal Zone Management Act 

o Project is not located in a coastal zone area and does not affect a coastal zone area (Review concluded) 

r:gJ Project is located in a coastal zone area and/or affects the coastal zone 
r:gJ State administering agency does not require consistency review. (Review Concluded). 

o State administering agency requires consistency review. 
Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: 08/3112006 -This project is located within the Louisiana Coastal Management Zone. LA DNR has determined 
that receipt offederal assistance is consistent with the Louisiana Coastal Resource Program. Projects within the coastal zone 
may still require a coastal use pennit or other authorization from DNR. Projects may be coordinated by contacting LA DNR 
at 1-800-267-4019. Brandon M. Clark, Environmental Specialist 

Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

F. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 
r:gJ Project does not affect, control, or modify a waterwaylbody of water. (Review Concluded) 


o Project affects, controls or modifies a waterwaylbody of water. 

D Coordination with USFWS conducted 
D No Recommendations offered by USFWS. (Review Concluded) 
D Recommendations provided by USFWS. 


Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: Project is not in or adjacent to any waterways ofthe United States. 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

G. Clean Air Act 
r:gJ Project will not result in permanent air emissions. (Review Concluded) 
D Project is located in an attainment area. (Review Concluded) 
D Project is located in a non-attainment area. 


D Coordination required with applicable state administering agency .. 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: Project will not result in permanent air emissions. 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

H. Farmland Protection Policy Act 
r:gJ Project does not affect designated prime or unique farmland. (Review Concluded) 
D Project causes unnecessary or irreversible conversion ofdesignated prime or unique farmland. 


D Coordination with Natural Resource Conservation Commission required.
D Farmland Conversion Impact Rating, Form AD-I006, completed. 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

I. Migratory Bird Treaty Act 
D Project not located within a flyway zone. (Review Concluded) 
r:gJ Project located within a flyway zone. 


r:gJ Project does not have potential to take migratory birds. (Review Concluded) 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) r:gJ No (Review Concluded) 
Record ofEnvironmental Consideration 4 08/31106 


---, 

Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark AppliuDt: Recovery School District 
DisuterlEmergeDcylProgramIProject Tide: DRl603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elementary 
School-Building C 

D Project has potential to take migratory birds. 

D Contact made with USFWS 

Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO <Review Concluded) 

Comments: See letter from Don Fairley to Mr. Russ Watson with USF&WS, dated 09/1412005. Specifically, FEMA has 
determined that restoration projects funded with federal resources will not have adverse impacts on migratory birds or other 
fish and wildlife reserves. These determinations are based on the understanding that the conditions outlined in the Louisiana 
Endangered Species Summary are met. 
Co"espondence/Consu!tation/References: http://pacificflyway.govlDocumentslMississippi map.pdf 

J. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

181 Project not located in or near Essential Fish Habitat. <Review Concluded) 
D Project located in or near Essential Fish Habitat. 
D Project does not adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat. <Review Concluded) 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 
D Project adversely affects Essential Fish Habitat (FEMA determinationlUSFWSINMFS concurrence on file) 
D NOAA Fisheries provided no recommendation(s) <Review Concluded). 
Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded)
D NOAA Fisheries provided recommendation(s) 
D Written reply to NOAA Fisheries recommendations completed. 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO <Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

K. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 

181 Project is not along and does not affect Wild or Scenic River (WSR) -<Review Concluded) 
D Project is along or affects WSR 
D Project adversely affects WSR as determined by NPS/uSFS. FEMA cannot fund the action. 
(NPS/uSFS/uSFWSIBLM consultation on file) <Review Concluded) 
D Project does not adversely affect WSR. (NPS/uSFS/uSFWSIBLM consultation on file) 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO <Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

L. Other Relevant Laws and Environmental Regulations 

II. Compliance Review for Executive Orders 

A. E.O. 11988 -Floodplains 

D No Effect on Floodplains/Flood levels and project outside Floodplain -<Review Concluded)
181 Located in Floodplain or Effects on FloodplainslFlood levels 

D No adverse effect on floodplain and not adversely affected by the floodplain. (Review Concluded), 

Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No <Review Concluded) 

D Beneficial Effect on Floodplain OccupancyNalues (Review Concluded). 

181 Possible adverse effects associated with investment in floodplain, occupancy or modification of floodplain 

environment 

rgJ 8 Step Process Complete -documentation on file 

Are project conditions required? rgJ YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: 08/29/06-The City ofNew Orleans / Orleans Parish is enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 
as of 08-03-70, as determined per Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel number 2252030095E, dated 03-01-84. Facility 
is located within an "A I" Zone, area of 1OO-yr flooding, base flood elevations and flood hazard factors. The project is the 
replacement of building, equipment, and components, as per 44 CFR 9.11, mitigation or minimization standards must be 
applied. Where possible, building contents, materials, and equipment (mechanical or electrical) must be elevated to or above 

Record of Environmental Consideration 5 08/31/06 


Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicaat: Recovery School District 
DisasterlEmergeacylPrognmiProjeet Tide: DR1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 LangstOn Hughes Elementary 
School-Building C 


above advisory base flood elevations. In compliance with EO 11988. an 8-step process was completed and is attached. Per 44 

CFR 9.12. applicant must publish a final public notice 15 days prior to the start ofconstruction activities. Final public notice 

is to be forwarded to the LAGOHS/OEP and FEMA for inclusion in the permanent project files. A Cramer FPM Specialist. 

ICorrespondence/Consultation/References: 

B. E.O. 11990 -Wetlands 

1:81 No Effects on Wetland(s) and project located outside Wetland(s) -(Review Concluded) 

D Located in Wetland or effects WetJand(s)

D Beneficial Effect on Wetland -(Review Concluded) 

D Possible adverse effect associated with constructing in or near wetland 

D Review completed as part offloodplain review 
D 8 Step Process Complete -docwnentation on file 
Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

C. E.O. 12898 -Environmental Justice For Low Income and Minority Populations 

1:81 No Low income or minority population in, near or affected by the project -(Review Concluded) 

D Low income or minority population in or near project area 
D No disproportionately high and adverse impact on low income or minority population-(Review Concluded) 
D Disproportionately high or adverse effects on low income or minority population 

Are project conditions required? D YES (see section V) D NO (Review Concluded) 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

III. Other Environmental Issues 

Identify other potential environmental concerns in the comment box not clearly falling under a law or 
executive order (see environmental concerns scoping checklist for guidance). 

Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

IV. Extraordinary Circumstances 

Based on the review of compliance with other environmental laws and Executive Orders, and in 
consideration of other environmental factors, review the project for extraordinary circumstances. 

*A "Yes" under any circwnstance may require an Environmental Assessment (EA) with the exception of (ii) which 
should be applied in conjunction with controversy on an environmental issue. If the circumstance can be mitigated, 
please explain in comments. Ifno, leave blank. 

Yes 
D (i) Greater scope or size than normally experienced for a particular category of action 
D (ii) Actions with a high level ofpublic controversy 
D (iii) Potential for degradation, even though slight, of already existing poor environmental 


conditions; 
D (iv) Employment of unproven technology with potential adverse effects or actions involving 
unique or unknown environmental risks; 
D (v) Presence of endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat, or archaeological, 
cultural, historical or other protected resources; 
D (vi) Presence of hazardous or toxic substances at levels which exceed Federal, state or local 
regulations or standards requiring action or attention; 



Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applicaat: Recovery School District 
DlsuterlEmergeDcylPrognm/Projed Title: DR1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elementary 
School-Building C 

o (vii) Actions with the potential to affect special status areas adversely or other critical resources 
such as wetlands, coastal zones, wildlife refuge and wilderness areas, wild and scenic rivers, 
sole or principal drinking water aquifers; 


o (viii) Potential for adverse effects on health or safety; and 
o (ix) Potential to violate a federal, state, local or tnballaw or requirement imposed for the 
protection ofthe environment. 
o (x) Potential for significant cumulative impact when the proposed action is combined with 
other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions, even though the impacts ofthe 


ro sed action rna not be si 'ficant b themselves. 
Comments: None 
Correspondence/Consultation/References: 

v. Environmental Review Project Conditions 

Project Conditions: 

1. Demolition must follow the low impact demolition stipulations & additional protocols which are 
attached. The stipulations and protocols should be explicit in the demolition contract. Failure to 
comply with these stipulations & additional protocols will jeopardize receipt of federal funding. If 
during the course of work, archaeological artifacts (prehistoric or historic) or human remains are 
discovered, the applicant shall stop work in the vicinity of the discovery and take all reasonable 
measures to avoid or minimize harm to the finds. The applicant shall inform their Public 
Assistance (PA) contacts at FEMA, who will in tum contact FEMA Historic Preservation Staff. 
The applicant will not proceed with work until FEMA Historic Preservation Staff have completed 
consultation with the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In addition, if 
unmarked graves are present, compliance with the Louisiana Unmarked Human Burial Sites 
Preservation Act (R.S. 8:671 et seq.) is required. The applicant shall notify the law enforcement 
agency ofthe jurisdiction where the remains are located within twenty-four hours ofthe discovery. 
The applicant shall also notify FEMA and the Louisiana Unmarked Burial Sites Board (call the 
Louisiana Division of Archeology at 225-342-8170) within seventy-two hours ofthe discovery. If 
this scope of work and/or the footprin1Jlocation of the new building changes, this project will need 
to be resubmitted for further Section 106 review prior to ground disturbing activities taking place 
outside of the pre-disaster footprint ofthe building. 
2. The project is the replacement ofbuilding, equipment, and components, as per 44 CFR 9.11, 
mitigation or minimization standards must be applied. Where possible, building contents, 
materials, and equipment (mechanical or electrical) must be elevated to or above advisory base 
flood elevations. In compliance with EO 11988, an 8-step process was completed and is attached. 
Per 44 CFR 9.12, applicant must publish a final public notice 15 days prior to the start of 
construction activities. Final public notice is to be forwarded to the LAGOHS/OEP and FEMA 
for inclusion in the permanent project files. 
3. Unusable equipment, debris and material shall be disposed of in an approved manner and 
location. In the event significant items (or evidence thereof) are discovered during 
implementation of the project applicant shall handle, manage, and dispose of petroleum products, 
hazardous materials. and/or toxic waste in accordance to the requirements and to the satisfaction of 
the governing local, state and federal agencies. 
4. Removal and disposal ofdebris containing household hazardous waste and certain categories of 
liquid wastes must be performed in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, 
regulations, executive orders and guidelines. LAC Title 33 Part VII requires that specified items, 
including lead acid batteries, used oil filters, used motor oil, scrap tires, cfc's (refrigerants), 
radioactive waste or regulated infectious wastes must be segregated from and excluded from nonhazardous 
debris collection, staging, processing and disposal sites. 



Reviewer Name: Brandon M. Clark Applieant: Recovery School District 
DiSMterlEmergeaeylProgramIProjeet TIde: DRI603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2243 Langston Hughes Elemental)' 
School-Building C 


5. In accordance with the Formosan Termite Initiative Act, (LA RS. 3:3391.1 thru 3391.13) the 
Louisiana Parishes of Calcasieu, Cameron, Jefferson Davis, Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, st. 
Bernard, St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa and Washington are under 
quarantine. The movement ofwood or cellulose material, temporary housing or architectural 
components (e.g. beams, doors and other wood salvaged from a structure) may not leave the 
quarantined parishes without written authorization from the commissioner ofthe Louisiana 
Department of Agriculture and Forestry or his designee(s). 
6. This project involves the demolition or renovation ofa public structure that may contain surfaces 
coated with lead-based paint (LBP). Activities involving abrading (sanding, scraping, etc.), 
heating, stripping, or otherwise concentrating LBP shall comply with applicable provisions of29 
CFR Parts 1910 and 1926 (OSHA -worker safety), and 40 CFR 260 through 268 (EPAhazardous 
waste). The applicant is responsible for ensuring that renovation or demolition 
activities are coordinated with the Louisiana Department ofEnvironmental Quality for abatement 
activities and is also responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously 
referenced regulations. 
7. This project involves the demolition or renovation ofa public structure. Regardless ofthe 
asbestos content, the applicant is responsible for ensuring that renovation or demolition activities 
are coordinated with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) in accordance 
with the LDEQ "Sixth Amended Declaration ofemergency and administrative order" dated June 
30, 2006., incorporating the provisions of EPA's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants (NESHAP) and the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 33.llI.SlSI and Chapter 27. 
Should asbestos containing materials (ACMS) be present at the project site, the applicant is also 
responsible for ensuring proper disposal in accordance with the previously referenced 
administrative order. 
8. Mercury containing devices -This project potentially involves the disposal of metallic mercury 
containing electronic devices. The applicant is responsible for ensuring that these devices are recovered, 
recycled, reused or sequestered in accordance with the Louisiana Department ofEnvironmental Quality 
(LDEQ) "Declaration of Emergency; Mercury-Containing Devices and Electronic Equipment as 
Universal Waste" letter dated October 3, 2005. 


Monitoring Requirements: None