Reviewer Name: Letha Dawson Applic:ant: Recovery School District DisuterlEmergenc:ylPrognmIProjec:t Title: DR 1603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2089 Haley. Oretha C. Elementary School· Fences Record of Environmental Consideration See 44 Code ofFederal Regulation Part 10. Project NamelNumber: Haley, OrethaC. Elementary School-Fences / PW 13128 Project Location: 2515 N. Robertson St., New Orleans, Louisiana, Orleans Parish, 70126 (N 29.97339, W -90.04985) Project Description: Project activities include demolishing wooden fence; replacing wood posts set in concrete, wooden planks, double chain link: gate with 3 strands ofbarb wire, chain link: with 3strands of barb wire, chain link: fabric, comer posts, top rail, tether ball poles and base, and wood benches with posts set in concrete; and cleaning and painting ofwrought iron gates. Some mitigation will be achieved by compliance with current codes and standards and by good construction practices. Documentation Requirements o No Documentation Required (Review Concluded) o (Short version) All consultation and agreements implemented to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, and Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 12898 are completed and no other laws apply. (Review Concluded) ~ (Long version) All applicable laws and executive orders were reviewed. Additional information for compliance is attached to this REC. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPAl Determination ·0 Statutorily excluded from NEPA review. (Review Concluded) o Programmatic Categorical Exclusion -Category (Review Concluded) o Categorical Exclusion -Category o No Extraordinary Circumstances exist. Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) o Extraordinary Circumstances exist (See Section IV). o Extraordinary Circumstances mitigated. (See Section IV comments) Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) o Environmental Assessment o Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Reference EA or PEA in comments) ~ Environmental Impact Statement IComments: 8/9/2006 This project meets the criteria for an Alternative Arrangement (permanent Schools) type ofproject. Reviewer Name: Letha Dawson Applicant: Recovery School District DI...terlEmergencylProgramJProject Title: DR 1603LA / Hurricane Katrina / Public Assistance Program / EOR 2089 Haley, Oretha C. Elementary School -Fences Reviewer and Approvals D Project is Non-Compliant (See attached documentation justifying selection). FEMA Environmental Reviewer. Name: Letha Dawson, Environmental Specialist Signature ~u~ . Date __O=8~/O=9;.:..::/2=O:..;:;.O..::...6_____....:. FEMA Regional Environmental Officer or delegated approving official. Name: Howard R. Bush, ELO Signature~~/~ . O=8~/O=9;.:..::/2=O:..;:;.O..::...6_____....:. Date __ I. Compliance Review for Environmental Laws (other than NEPAl A. National Historic Preservation Act D Not type ofactivity with potential to affect historic properties. (Review Concluded) ~Applicable executed Programmatic Agreement (12/0312004) Otherwise, conduct standard Section 106 review. ~Activity meets Programmatic Allowance # Appendix A, Items I-E, II-H Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) ~No (Review Concluded) mSTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES D No historic properties that are listed or 45/50 years or older in project area. (Review Concluded) D Building or structure listed or 45/50 years or older in project area and activity not exempt from review. D Determination ofNo Historic Properties Affected (FEMA fmdinglSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Determination of Historic Properties Affected (FEMA findinglSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) D Property a National Historic Landmark and National Park Service was provided early notification during the consultation process. Ifnot, explain in comments D No Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA fmdinglSHPOITHPO concurrence on file). Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Adverse Effect Determination (FEMA fmdinglSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) D Resolution of Adverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ~Project affects only previously disturbed ground. (Review Concluded) D Project affects undisturbed ground. D Project area has no potential for presence of archeological resources D Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA fmdinglSHPOITHPO concurrence or consultation on file). (Review Concluded) D Project area has potential for presence of archeological resources D Determination of no historic properties affected (FEMA findinglSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Determination of historic properties affected D NR eligible resources not present (FEMA findinglSHPOITHPO concurrence on file). Are project conditions required DYes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D NR eligible resources present in project area. (FEMA fmdingl SHPOITHPO concurrence on file) D No Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA findingl SHPOITHPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA fmdingl SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) Rnitwer Name: Letha Dawson Applie.ot: Recovery School District DlsuterlEmergeoeylProgramIProjeet Title: DRI603LA I Hurricane Katrina I Public Assistance Program I EOR 2089 Haley, Oretha C. Elementary School· Fences o Resolution ofAdverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) Comments: 08/0912006-This scope ofwork has been revieWed and meets the criteria in Appendix A, Programmatic Allowances (PA), Items I-E (replacement offencing), U-H (replacement ofathletic equipment) in accordance with the PA, dated December 3, 2004. No known archaeological sites or historic properties will be affected by this undertaking. All ground disturbing activities being performed in previously disturbed or archaeologically surveyed areas do not require Section 106 review. This determination could change should new information come to the Louisiana SHPO's Office. Any change to the approved scope of work will require resubmission for re-evaluation under Section 106.-Kathleen M. Bergeron, Historic Preservation Specialist Correspondence/Consultation/References: B. Endangered Species Act t8I No listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. eview oncluded Listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in the areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. o No effect to species or designated critical habitat. (See comments for justification) Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No retha C. Elementary School -Fences v. Environmental Review Project Conditions General comments: None Project Conditions: None Monitoring Requirements: None