Reviewer Name: June R. Griffin Applicant: Orleans Parish School Board DisasterlEmergencylProgramIProject Title: DRI603LA! Hurricane Katrina lPublic Assistance ProgramlEOR 15921.M. Augustine Middle Building A Record of Environmental Consideration See 44 Code ofFederal Regulation Part 10. Project Name/Number: EOR 1592 I.M. Augustine Middle School-Building A / PW 12434 Project Location: 425 S. Broad Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, Orleans Parish 70119 (N29.96233, W-90.09045) Project Description: Project activities include replacing 39,345 SF ofplumbing system (ground floor), 39,345 SF of mechanical HV AC units (first floor only), and 39,345 SF ofelectrical system (ground floor, including lights). Replace (2) 3070 flush double exterior wood doors (auditorium), (2) 3070 flush double interior wood doors (auditorium), 124 LF of 6" wood base (auditorium stage), and 334 SY ofstage drapes (auditorium stage). Hazard Mitigation will be achieved by compliance with codes and standards and good construction practices. D (Short version) All consultation and agreements implemented to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, and Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 12898 are completed and no other laws apply. (Review Concluded) C8J (Long version) All applicable laws and executive orders were reviewed. Additional information for compliance is attached to this REC. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPAl Determination D Statutorily excluded from NEPA review. (Review Concluded) D Programmatic Categorical Exclusion -Category (Review Concluded) D Categorical Exclusion -Category D No Extraordinary Circumstances exist. Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Extraordinary Circumstances exist (See Section IV). D Extraordinary Circumstances mitigated. (See Section IV comments) Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Environmental Assessment D Supplemental Environmental Assessment (Reference EA or PEA in comments) C8J Environmental Impact Statement Comments: Although this project would have qualified as a CATEX (XV) under 44 CFR Part 10.8 (D) (2), this project meets the defmition ofCritical Infrastructure (Pennanent Schools) under the Alternative Arrangements for NEPA Compliance. This project has conditions and requires mitigation under the other Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Laws, which are listed under the NEPA Level ofEnvironmental Review in the Project Worksheet. Any changes to this approved Scope ofWork will require submission to, and evaluation and approval by, the state and FEMA prior to initiation ofany work, for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The applicant is required to obtain and comply with all local, state and federal pennits and requirements. Non-compliance with the requirements noted above may jeopardize the receipt offederal funding. Reviewer Name: June R. Griffin Applicant: Orleans Parish School Board DisasterlEmergency!Program!Project Title: DR1603LA / Hurricane Katrina !Public Assistance Program/EOR 1592 I.M. Augustine MiddleBuilding A Reviewer and Approvals o Project is Non-Compliant (See attached documentation justifying selection). FEMA Environmental Reviewer. Name: June R. Signature:_~:lt:::1&~-:..AL...,~~~~..-!.~_----!' Date _~9/=2=6/,-",O=6____---=- FEMAReg' cer or delegated approving official. Name: Ho d R. Bush, ELO Signature ~r:I3 . Date _---"9:.:..:/2~6:::../0~6~___--' ~ I. Compliance Review for Environmental Laws (other than NEPAl A. National Historic Preservation Act D Not type of activity with potential to affect historic properties. (Review Concluded) [8j Applicable executed Programmatic Agreement. Otherwise, conduct standard Section 106 review. D Activity meets Programmatic Allowance, Appendix A, Section II (BI, B2, A2, AI, CI, H, D2, I-D, & C2). Are project conditions required? [8j Yes (see Section V) D No (Review Concluded) HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES D No historic properties that are listed or 45/50 years or older in project area. (Review Concluded) D Building or structure listed or 45/50 years or older in project area and activity not exempt from review. D Detennination ofNo Historic Properties Affected (FEMA findingiSHPOfTHPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Detennination of Historic Properties Affected (FEMA findingiSHPOfTHPO concurrence on file) D Property a National Historic Landmark and National Park Service was provided early notification during the consultation process. Ifnot, explain in comments D No Adverse Effect Detennination (FEMA fmdingiSHPOfTHPO concurrence on file). Are project conditions required? D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Adverse Effect Detennination (FEMA findingiSHPOITHPO concurrence on file) D Resolution ofAdverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES [8j Project affects only previously disturbed ground. (Review Concluded) D Project affects undisturbed ground. D Project area has no potential for presence of archeological resources D Detennination ofno historic properties affected (FEMA fmdingiSHPO/THPO concurrence or consultation on file). (Review Concluded) D Project area has potential for presence of archeological resources D Detennination of no historic properties affected (FEMA fmdingiSHPO/THPO concurrence on file) Are project conditions required D Yes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D Detennination of historic properties affected D NR eligible resources not present (FEMA findingiSHPO/THPO concurrence on file). Are project conditions required DYes (see section V) D No (Review Concluded) D NR eligible resources present in project area. (FEMA findingl SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) D No Adverse Effect Detennination. (FEMA fmdingl SHPO/THPO concurrence on file) Record of Environmental Consideration 2 09/26/06 Reviewer Name: June R. Griffin Applieant: Orleans Parish School Board DisasterlEmergeney/ProgramiProject Title: DRI603LA I Hurricane Katrina /Public Assistance Program/EOR 1592 I.M. Augustine MiddleBuilding A Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) o Adverse Effect Determination. (FEMA finding! SHPOITHPO concurrence on file) o Resolution ofAdverse Effect completed. (MOA on file) Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) Comments: 09125/2006-Cleaning of historic building materials, systems and finishes must be executed in accord with the guidance contained in the U.S. Department of the Interior, NPS, Preservation Brief No. 6, dangers of abrasive cleaning to historic buildings, (see http://www.cr.nps.govlhpsltpslbriefslbrief06.htm). Requirements include identification ofmaterials to be cleaned, protection of materials not to be cleaned, identification ofgentlest means of cleaning possible and testing of cleaning means and methods. Work is to be executed by qualified workers, with documented successful experience working with historic building materials. Abrasive methods of cleaning are prohibited including: power washing, pressure washing and blasting, unless under the supervision of a qualified Building Conservator or Historical Architect. Washing with potable water, non-ionic detergent, scrubbing with natural bristle brushes and rinsing with potable water is acceptable for most historic building materials. Other methods may be acceptable when specified by a qualified Historical Architect (36 CFR Part 61). Failure to comply with these stipulations may jeopardize receipt ofFEMA funding. -V. Gomez, Historic Preservation Specialist. 9/25/2006 -FEMA's Programmatic Agreement (PA), dated December 3, 2004, provides for expedited project review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The scope ofwork as submitted in this PW has been reviewed and meets the criteria outlined in Appendix A, Programmatic Allowances, Section {II-BI, II-B2, II-A2, II-AI, 1ICl, II-H, II-D2, I-D, II-C2}, of the document. In accordance with the PA, FEMA is not required to submit projects to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) for review where the work performed meets these allowances. This concludes the Section 106 review for this project in keeping with the stipulations ofthe PA all proposed repair activities should be done in-kind to match existing materials and form. Any change to the approved Scope of Work will require resubmission for re-evaluation under Section 106 and consultation with the SHPO. Non-compliance may jeopardize the receipt of federal funding. V. Gomez, Historic Preservation Specialist Correspondence/Consultation/References: B. Endangered Species Act [8J No listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. (Review Concluded) o Listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in the areas affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action. o No effect to species or designated critical habitat (See comments for justification) Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) oMay affect, but not likely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat (FEMA determinationlUSFWSINMFS concurrence on file) (Review Concluded) Are project conditions required? 0 Yes (see section V) 0 No (Review Concluded) oLikely to adversely affect species or designated critical habitat o Formal consultation concluded. (Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion on file) Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) IComments: None C. Coastal Barrier Resources Act [8J Project is not on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area (Review Concluded). o Project is on or connected to CBRA Unit or Otherwise Protected Area. (FEMA determinationlUSFWS consultation on file) o Proposed action an exception under Section 3505.a.6? (Review Concluded) oProposed action not excepted under Section 3505.a.6. Are project conditions required? 0 YES (see section V) 0 NO (Review Concluded) Comments: None Correspondence/Consultation/References: Reviewer Name: June R. Griffin Applicant: Orleans Parish School Board DisasterlEmergencylProgramIProjeet Title: DR 1603LA I Hurricane Katrina /Public Assistance ProgramlEOR 1592 I.M. Augustine Middle Building A D. Clean Water Act [8J Project would not affect any waters ofthe U.S. (Review Concluded) o Project would affect waters, including wetlands, ofthe U.S. o Project exempted as in kind replacement or other exemption.