U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Fiscal Year 2008 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND APPLICATION KIT February 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM KEY CHANGES The Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) contains significant improvements based upon continued outreach to HSGP participants and stakeholders. In addition, the risk assessments that form the basis for eligibility under HSGP have been maintained and refined. Following are some of the key changes impacting FY 2008 HSGP as compared to previous year programs. Overarching HSGP Priorities Funding priorities for this year continue and further narrow the focus on risk-based funding and capability-based planning that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) began three years ago. FY 2008 HSGP will focus on three objectives as its highest priorities. These three objectives are: 1. Measuring progress in achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines 2. Strengthening improvised explosive device (IED) attack deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities 3. Strengthening preparedness planning At least 25 percent of FY 2008 HSGP (State Homeland Security Program [SHSP], Urban Areas Security Initiative [UASI], Metropolitan Medical Response System [MMRS], and Citizen Corps Program [CCP]) funding must be collectively allocated to objectives 2 and 3. Consolidation of Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention-oriented Activities Per the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (hereafter “9/11 Act”) and FY 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY 2008 HSGP will not contain a separate line-item Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP). As is clear in this year’s overarching HSGP priorities (identified above), a significant need for law enforcement terrorism prevention exists, particularly in the area of building IED prevention and protection capabilities. As a result, and in addition to the above minimum spending requirements towards the three overarching HSGP priorities, States are also required to ensure that at least 25 percent of their SHSP award funds and 25 percent of their UASI award funds are dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. Removal of Full-time Counterterrorism Staffing Pilot for Tier 1 UASI Jurisdictions As noted in FY 2007 HSGP, the Full-time Counterterrorism Staffing Pilot for FY 2007 UASI jurisdictions represented a pilot effort for FY 2007 only; it will not be repeated in FY 2008. Post-award Analysis To ensure that the HSGP funding is allocated to address the nation’s highest risks and support the capability-based planning process, the Department will conduct a post- award analysis to identify trends that can better inform and guide future policy decisions ii U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM supporting national preparedness. Grantees may be asked to cooperate in FEMA’s post-award analysis. Use of Metropolitan Statistical Areas in our Risk Methodology Per the 9/11 Act, the Department utilized the U.S. Census-determined Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) as a component of its risk methodology queries. In using this approach, some jurisdictions were included in the queries which historically had not been included in previous year UASI risk methodologies. Page nine shows a table of Urban Areas selected for possible FY 2008 funding. Appendix A shows the MSAs queried as part of the overall risk methodology. Obligation of Funds The SAA must obligate 80 percent of the funds awarded under SHSP and UASI to local units of government within 45 days of receipt of the funds (as opposed to 60 days as noted in the FY 2007 HSGP). For Puerto Rico, the SAA must also obligate 80 percent of the funds to local units of government within 45 days of receipt of the funds (as opposed to obligating 50 percent of funds within 60 days as required in the FY 2007 HSGP). No pass-through requirements will be applied to the District of Columbia, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. With respect to MMRS funds, States must obligate 100 percent of MMRS grant funds within 45 days of receipt (as opposed to obligating 80 percent within 60 days as noted in the FY 2007 HSGP). For CCP funds, there are no obligation requirements. Management and Administration (M&A) Funds A maximum of up to three percent (3%) of funds awarded may be retained by the State (as opposed to 5 percent [5%] of funds as noted in the FY 2007 HSGP), and any funds retained are to be used solely for management and administrative purposes associated with the HSGP award. States may pass through a portion of the State’s M&A allocation to local subgrantees to support local management and administration activities; the overall subgrantee M&A amount may not equal more than three percent (3%). Potential for Future Match Requirements Grantees are not required to engage in cash or in-kind match for FY 2008 HSGP funds. However, there is the potential for future grant programs to be impacted by cash match requirements as early as FY 2009. Accordingly, grantees should anticipate and plan for future homeland security programs to require cash or in-kind matches at cost-share levels comparable to other FEMA-administered grant programs. Application Requirements Applicants should refer to Appendix E, FY 2008 HSGP Application Requirements, for specific instructions on the application steps required for successfully submitting their FY 2008 HSGP application to DHS. Grantees are required to comply with HSGP financial rules and regulations in accordance with FEMA’s grant programs. All applicants are required to read and conform to all requirements of this grant guidance document. iii U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM CONTENTS KEY CHANGES .................................................................................................................. ii INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 PART I. AVAILABLE FUNDING AND ELIGIBLEAPPLICANTS .....................................................8 PART II. APPLICATION AND EVALUATION PROCESS ............................................................ 14 PART III. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................16 PART IV. GENERAL HSGPALLOWABLECOSTS GUIDANCE................................................18 PART V. ALLOWABLE COSTS GUIDANCE LAW ENFORCMENT TERRORISM PREVENTIONORIENTED ALLOWABLE COSTS ........................................................................................ 25 PART VI. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM ........................... 26 PART VII. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: URBAN AREAS SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................ 30 PART VIII. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: METROPOLITAN MEDICAL RESPONSE SYSTEM................. 36 PART IX. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: CITIZEN CORPS PROGRAM ............................................... 41 APPENDIX A. METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS) QUERIED FOR UASI RISK METHODOLOGY DETERMINATIONS .................................................................................. A-1 APPENDIX B. AUTHORIZED ALLOWABLE COSTS .............................................................. B-1 APPENDIX C. HSGP ALLOWABLE EXPENSES: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ......................... C-1 APPENDIX D. INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATION ....................................................................... D-1 APPENDIX E. FY 2008 HSGP APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ............................................E-1 APPENDIX F. AWARD AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.....................................................F-1 APPENDIX G. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES........................................................................... G-1 iv U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The Homeland Security Grant Program is comprised of four interconnected grant programs: • State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) • Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) • Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) • Citizen Corps Program (CCP) The HSGP is one tool among a comprehensive set of measures authorized by Congress and implemented by the Administration to help strengthen the Nation against risks associated with potential terrorist attacks. The purpose of this package is to provide: (1) an overview of the HSGP; and (2) the formal grant guidance and application materials needed to apply for funding under the program. The package outlines FEMA management requirements for implementation of a successful application. The package also reflects changes called for in the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (hereafter “9/11 Act”), enacted in August 2007, as well as the FY 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act. Making an application for significant Federal funds under programs such as this can be complex. Our job at FEMA is to provide clear guidance and efficient application tools to assist applicants. Our customers are entitled to effective assistance during the application process, and transparent, disciplined management controls to support grant awards. We intend to be good stewards of precious Federal resources, and commonsense partners with our State and local colleagues. We understand that grant applicants will have unique needs and tested experience about how best to reduce risk locally. Our subject matter experts will come to the task with a sense of urgency to reduce risk, but also with an ability to listen carefully to local needs and approaches. In short, we commit to respect flexibility and local innovation as we fund national homeland security priorities. Table 1 provides a quick overview of the programs included in FY 2008 HSGP. 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM FY 2008 Homeland Security Grant Program Overview FY 2008 HSGP Program Overview State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) SHSP supports the implementation of State Homeland Security Strategies to address the identified planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs for acts of terrorism and other catastrophic events. In addition, SHSP supports the implementation of the National Preparedness Guidelines, the National Incident Management System (NIMS), and the National Response Framework (NRF) Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Program UASI Program funds address the unique planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high-threat, high-density Urban Areas, and assist them in building an enhanced and sustainable capacity to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism. Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) Program MMRS funds enable jurisdictions to further enhance and sustain a comprehensive regional mass casualty incident response capability during the first crucial hours of an incident. The program prepares jurisdictions for response to all-hazards mass casualty incidents, including terrorism, naturally occurring events, and large-scale hazardous materials incidents. Citizen Corps Program (CCP) The Citizen Corps mission is to bring community and government leaders together to coordinate the involvement of community members in emergency preparedness, planning, mitigation, response, and recovery. A. Federal Investment Strategy. The HSGP is an important part of the Administration’s larger, coordinated effort to strengthen homeland security preparedness. The HSGP implements objectives addressed in a series of post-9/11 laws, strategy documents, plans and Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPDs). FEMA expects our State, local, and tribal partners – including recipients of HSGP grants – to be familiar with this national preparedness architecture and to incorporate elements of this architecture into their planning, operations and investments. B. Funding Priorities. Based upon ongoing intelligence analysis, extensive security reviews and Congressional direction, FEMA has once again focused the bulk of its available grant dollars on risk-based investment. Eligible applicants were identified using a comprehensive, empirically-grounded risk analysis methodology. Risk will be evaluated 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM at the Federal level using a risk analysis model developed by DHS in conjunction with other Federal entities. Risk is defined as the product of three principal variables: • Threat – the likelihood of an attack occurring • Vulnerability and Consequence – the relative exposure and expected impact of an attack The risk model used to allocate HSGP funds considers the potential risk of terrorism to people, critical infrastructure, and economic security to estimate the relative risk of terrorism faced by a given area. In evaluating risk, DHS considers the populations in a particular area that could be at risk, the concentration of people in the area, and specific characteristics of their location that might contribute to risk, such as Intelligence Community assessments of threat, proximity to nationally critical infrastructure, and the economic impact of an attack. In considering threat, DHS uses the Intelligence Community’s best assessment of areas of the country and potential targets most likely to be attacked. For vulnerability and consequence, DHS considers the expected impact and consequences of successful attacks occurring in specific areas, to people, the economy, nationally critical infrastructure and national security facilities. FEMA places a very high priority on ensuring that all HSGP applications reflect robust regional coordination and can show an investment strategy that institutionalizes regional integration. This priority is a core component in the Department’s statewide grant programs and the Urban Areas Security Initiative grants. Overarching HSGP Priorities Funding priorities for this year continue and further narrow the focus through risk-based funding and the capability-based planning process that DHS began three years ago. FY 2008 HSGP will focus on three objectives as its highest priorities. These three objectives are: 1. Measuring progress in achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines 2. Strengthening improvised explosive device (IED) attack deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities 3. Strengthening preparedness planning At least 25 percent of the total FY 2008 HSGP funding must be dedicated toward enhancing capabilities related to objectives 2 and 3 as identified above (and also visually outlined in Table 2.) The 25 percent requirement applies to the total award amount for each State across all four programs, not individual awards for SHSP, UASI, MMRS, and CCP. 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Table 2 FY 2008 Overarching HSGP Priorities HSGP Objective Measure Progress Alignment to National Priority All Alignment to Capability from TCL All Supporting Grant Program SHSP, UASI, MMRS, CCP Required Funding Threshold N/A Strengthen IED- related Capabilities (Specific to Deterrence, Prevention, and Protection) Strengthen CBRNE Detection, Response, and Decontamination Capabilities Critical Infrastructure Protection CBRNE Detection Explosive Device Response Operations SHSP, UASI 25% of total FY 2008 HSGP Funding Strengthen Preparedness Planning Strengthen Planning and Citizen Preparedness Capabilities Planning Citizen Evacuation and Shelter in Place Community Preparedness and Participation Mass Care SHSP, UASI, MMRS, CCP 1. Measuring Progress in Achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines. FEMA will continue in FY 2008 to tie together the established priorities and objectives of the National Preparedness Guidelines with efforts to further establish target capabilities, conduct joint federal-State assessments and make adjustments to better ensure that our investment is yielding measurable improvements in our nation’s preparedness. As part of the FY 2008 HSGP Investment Justifications, applicants will be asked to establish specific capability-based outcomes associated with all proposed investments. Proposals should be aligned with the National Priorities of the National Preparedness Guidelines and must outline measurable outcomes that will be tracked and accomplished during implementation. Grantees should reference the Target Capabilities List (TCL) and applicable national plans and strategies to develop concrete, measurable outcomes and milestones, while preserving the necessary flexibility to meet unique State and Urban Area operational requirements outlined in their homeland security strategies. Outcomes included in the Impact section of the Investment Justification will be reviewed and scored through the peer review process. After funds are awarded, grantees will be required to report on progress made toward achieving the identified outcomes for each Investment as part of the regular grant reporting process described in Appendix F. Performance measure data submitted through grant reporting will be reviewed and validated through programmatic monitoring by FEMA personnel. These outcomes should support both capability development and strategic, operational, and tactical-level planning. The outcomes should include a minimum number of quantitative and qualitative measures necessary to demonstrate achievement with regard to IED Deterrence, Prevention, and Protection and Preparedness Planning. These measures should be drawn, where applicable, from the Target Capabilities List (TCL). In addition to specific measures, grantees should outline two to four key 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM enablers for each Investment that are of such importance to achieving the outcome that they require monitoring and management during the period of performance. These enablers are major outputs from the Investment and can be physical (e.g., a major equipment item) or logical (e.g., a critical process, such as a formal planning process) in nature. Examples should be drawn from the “Resource Elements” listed as part of each capability in the TCL. Additional examples of operational outcomes and key enablers are included in the FY 2008 HSGP Investment Justification Reference Guide. This information will form the basis for measuring progress toward achieving IED Deterrence, Prevention, and Protection and Preparedness Planning outcomes during the period of performance of the grant. 2. Strengthening IED Attack Deterrence, Prevention, and Protection Capabilities. This provision aligns with the National Priority to Strengthen CBRNE Detection, Response, and Decontamination Capabilities as outlined in the National Preparedness Guidelines. The priority supports the policy outlined in Homeland Security Presidential Directive 19 “Combating Terrorist Use of Explosives in the United States” (HSPD-19) by emphasizing the need for States and Urban Areas to take a more proactive approach to reducing the threat of a terrorist explosive attack. States and Urban Areas should begin by implementing programs such as enhancing public and private sector IED awareness and reducing critical infrastructure/key resource (CIKR) and soft target explosive attack vulnerabilities. Doing so will increase the likelihood that terrorist planning activities are recognized and reported, and deter attacks by reducing the attractiveness of potential targets. Additional programs such as implementing multi-jurisdiction explosive attack planning will ensure State and Urban Areas coordinate preventive and protective actions during steady-state and threat-initiated environments. Finally, grantees should enhance explosive device pre-detonation response operations so that bomb squads have the necessary tools to defeat actual or suspected devices. These mitigation capabilities will serve to further prevent any attempted attack from achieving terrorist objectives. In support of this effort, the DHS Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) is dedicated to enhancing and coordinating the Nation’s ability to deter, prevent, and protect against IED attacks. OBP maintains multiple programs designed to support State and Urban Areas in explosive attack prevention and protection planning, analyzing explosive device mitigation capabilities and determining training and equipment requirements, improving IED awareness, and facilitating the sharing of terrorist IED techniques, tactics, and procedures through TRIPwire. Grantees are encouraged to work closely with OBP (in addition to their Preparedness Officer and FEMA Region) to ensure State and local initiatives sufficiently address IED threats. For more information, please contact OBP via obp@dhs.gov. To register for a TRIPwire account, go to http://www.tripwire-dhs.net. Activities to strengthen explosive attack deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities should be undertaken in coordination with the statewide CIKR protection program, which States were required to establish in FY 2007 in support of the NIPP. 5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Additional information to support the implementation of the NIPP is available at http://www.dhs.gov/nipp/. 3. Strengthening Preparedness Planning. This provision aligns with the National Priority to Strengthen Planning and Citizen Preparedness Capabilities as outlined in the National Preparedness Guidelines and supports the Planning Annex to HSPD-8 “National Preparedness.” State and local jurisdictions must engage in comprehensive national and regional planning processes that seek to enhance emergency management capabilities through strengthened national and regional relationships and the allocation of resources toward preparedness planning. As indicated in the Planning Annex, coordinated, comprehensive plans should be developed that cover prevention, protection, and response activities for specific planning scenarios. However, within these plans, specific activities may be implemented in support of the following areas: • Fixing shortcomings in existing plans. Areas of paramount concern are: Mass Evacuation and Sheltering, with particular emphasis on special needs populations1 and citizen preparedness; Resource/Commodity Management, with particular emphasis on National Incident Management System (NIMS) standardized mechanisms and processes to describe, inventory, mobilize, dispatch, track, and recover resources over both the lifecycle and regional or national scope of an incident, taking into account both at-risk and host jurisdictions/states; CIKR Protection, with particular emphasis on Explosive Device Response Operations; Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment; and Health and Medical Services for Catastrophic Events. Once these shortcomings have been addressed, they should be integrated into scenario-specific plans. • Building regional planning processes and planning communities. The primary focus is to establish processes for planning, preparedness, data exchange, and operational resource and asset management among regional planning partners. Activities should ensure that preparedness planning networks are fully integrated with other key planning efforts such as Area Maritime Security Plans (AMSPs) for port areas and Buffer Zone Plans (BZPs) for CIKR resources and community preparedness planning conducted by governmental and non-governmental entities through the Citizen Corps Council. • Linking operational needs identified in plans to resource allocation. Applicants should use grant funds to institutionalize a capabilities-based planning process that defines, documents, analyzes, adjusts, and approves capability requirements that drive resource allocation. • Including the private sector in preparedness planning activities. States and Urban Areas should include private sector entities in their preparedness planning process, building public-private partnerships where appropriate to more effectively 1 For the purposes of this document, special needs population is a population whose members may have additional needs before, during, and after an incident in one or more of the following functional areas: maintaining independence, communication, transportation, supervision, and medical care. Individuals in need of additional response assistance may include those who have disabilities; who live in institutionalized settings; who are elderly; who are children; who are from diverse cultures, who have limited English proficiency, or who are non-English speaking; or who are transportation disadvantaged. 6 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from major events. In particular, States and Urban Areas should engage with private sector entities as provisions for the voluntary private sector preparedness, accreditation, and certification program called for in the 9/11 Act are finalized in order to ensure that personnel have a comprehensive understanding of preparedness capabilities resident in their region. Consolidation of Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention-oriented Activities Per the 9/11 Act and FY 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY 2008 HSGP will not contain a separate line-item Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP). As is clear in this year’s three overarching HSGP priorities, a significant need for law enforcement terrorism prevention exists, particularly in the area of IED. As a result, and in addition to the above minimum spending requirements towards the three overarching HSGP priorities, States are also required to ensure that at least 25 percent of their SHSP award funds and 25 percent of their UASI award funds are dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. C. Allowable Expenses. Allowable Investments made in support of the funding priorities discussed above as well as other capability-enhancing projects must fall into one of the following six categories: 1. Planning 2. Organization 3. Equipment 4. Training 5. Exercises 6. Personnel The following grant guidance provides additional detail about each of these six allowable expense categories, as well as sections on additional activities including explicitly unallowable costs. In general, grantees should consult their FEMA Preparedness Officer prior to making any Investment that does not clearly meet the allowable expense criteria established by the guidance. 7 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART I. AVAILABLE FUNDING AND ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS This section summarizes the total amount of funding available under the FY 2008 HSGP, describes the basic distribution method used to determine final grants awards, and identifies all eligible applicants for FY 2008 funding. A. Available Funding. In FY 2008, the total amount of funds distributed under the HSGP will be $1,698,959,000. The available funding is summarized in the table below. HSGP Programs FY 2008 Funding State Homeland Security Grant $862,925,000 Urban Areas Security Initiative $781,630,000 Metropolitan Medical Response System $39,831,500 Citizen Corps Program $14,572,500 Total $1,698,959,000 For planning purposes, applicants should assume that the total amount of FY 2008 HSGP funding for individual States, Territories, and Urban Areas will not exceed twice the historical average percentage of HSGP program funds received annually from FY 2003 through FY 2007. For further information, the SAA should coordinate with its respective Preparedness Officer. The specific information regarding funding allocations for the four HSGP programs are detailed below. 1. FY 2008 SHSP Allocations. FY 2008 SHSP funds will be allocated based on risk and anticipated effectiveness upon completion of the application review process. Each State will receive a minimum allocation under SHSP using the thresholds established in the 9/11 Act. All 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico will receive 0.375 percent of the total funds allocated for grants under Sections 2003 and 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as amended by the 9/11 Act for SHSP and UASI programs. Four Territories (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) will receive a minimum allocation of 0.08 percent of the total funds allocated for grants under Sections 2003 and 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as amended by the 9/11 Act for SHSP and UASI programs. 2. FY 2008 UASI Allocations. 8 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM FY 2008 UASI funds will be allocated based on risk and anticipated effectiveness upon completion of the application review process. Eligible candidates for the FY 2008 UASI program have been determined through an analysis of relative risk of terrorism faced by the 100 most populous metropolitan statistical areas in the United States, in accordance with the 9/11 Act. Please refer to Appendix A to review the MSAs queried as part of the overall risk methodology. Based on that analysis, the following candidates are eligible to apply for funding under the FY 2008 UASI program. The eligible candidates have been grouped into two tiers according to relative risk. Tier I includes the seven highest risk areas and will be allocated 55 percent of the total UASI funding available; Tier II includes the other 53 candidate areas and will be allocated the remaining 45 percent of the total UASI funding available. The tier approach was employed to allow applicants with a similar level of risk to compete for funding on a level playing field. Eligible Urban Areas under the FY 2008 UASI Program 60 Urban Areas, $781,630,000 allocated FY 2008 Tier I Urban Areas* 7 Urban Areas, $429,896,500 allocated (CA) Los Angeles/Long Beach Area (NJ) Jersey City/Newark Area (CA) Bay Area (NY) New York City Area (DC) National Capital Region (TX) Houston Area (IL) Chicago Area FY 2008 Tier II Urban Areas* 53 Urban Areas, $351,733,500 allocated (AZ) Phoenix Area (AZ) Tucson Area (CA) Riverside Area (CA) Sacramento Area (CA) San Diego Area (CA) Anaheim/Santa Ana Area (CO) Denver Area (CT) Bridgeport Area (CT) Hartford Area (FL) Fort Lauderdale Area (FL) Jacksonville Area (FL) Miami Area (FL) Orlando Area (FL) Tampa Area (GA) Atlanta Area (HI) Honolulu Area (IN) Indianapolis Area (KY) Louisville Area (LA) Baton Rouge Area (LA) New Orleans Area (MA) Boston Area (MD) Baltimore Area (MI) Detroit Area (MN) Twin Cities Area (MO) Kansas City Area (MO) St. Louis Area (NC) Charlotte Area * Alphabetical placement does not equate to funding allocation. (NV) Las Vegas Area (NY) Albany Area (NY) Buffalo Area (NY) Rochester Area (NY) Syracuse Area (OH) Cincinnati Area (OH) Cleveland Area (OH) Columbus Area (OH) Toledo Area (OK) Oklahoma City Area (OR) Portland Area (PA) Philadelphia Area (PA) Pittsburgh Area (PR) San Juan Area (RI) Providence Area (TN) Memphis Area (TN) Nashville Area (TX) Austin Area (TX) Dallas/Fort Worth/Arlington Area (TX) El Paso Area (TX) San Antonio Area (UT) Salt Lake City Area (VA) Richmond Area (VA) Norfolk Area (WA) Seattle Area (WI) Milwaukee Area 9 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM 3. FY 2008 MMRS Allocations. FY 2008 MMRS funding will be divided evenly among the 124 MMRS jurisdictions listed below. FY 2008 MMRS Funding Allocations State MMRS Jurisdiction Allocation Alabama Birmingham, Huntsville, Mobile, and Montgomery $1,284,884 Alaska Anchorage and Southeast Alaska $642,442 Arizona Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, and Tucson $1,284,884 Arkansas Little Rock $321,221 California Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose, Long Beach, Oakland, Sacramento, Fresno, Santa Ana, Anaheim, Riverside, Glendale, Huntington Beach, Stockton, Bakersfield, Fremont, Modesto, and San Bernardino $5,781,978 Colorado Aurora, Colorado Springs, and Denver $963,663 Connecticut Hartford $321,221 Florida Miami, Jacksonville, Tampa, St. Petersburg, Hialeah, Ft. Lauderdale, and Orlando $2,248,547 Georgia Atlanta and Columbus $642,442 Hawaii Honolulu $321,221 Illinois Chicago $321,221 Indiana Ft. Wayne and Indianapolis $642,442 Iowa Des Moines $321,221 Kansas Kansas City and Wichita $642,442 Kentucky Lexington/Fayette and Louisville $642,442 Louisiana Baton Rouge, Jefferson Parish, New Orleans, and Shreveport $1,284,884 Maryland Baltimore $321,221 Massachusetts Boston, Springfield, and Worcester $963,663 Michigan Detroit, Grand Rapids, and Warren $963,663 Minnesota Minneapolis and St. Paul $642,442 Mississippi Jackson $321,221 Missouri Kansas City and St. Louis $642,442 Nebraska Lincoln and Omaha $642,442 Nevada Las Vegas $321,221 New Hampshire Northern New England MMRS $321,221 New Jersey Jersey City and Newark $642,442 New Mexico Albuquerque $321,221 New York Buffalo, New York City, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers $1,606,105 North Carolina Charlotte, Greensboro, and Raleigh $963,663 Ohio Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Toledo $1,927,326 Oklahoma Oklahoma City and Tulsa $642,442 Oregon Portland $321,221 10 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM State MMRS Jurisdiction Allocation Pennsylvania Allegheny County and Philadelphia $642,442 Rhode Island Providence $321,221 South Carolina Columbia $321,221 Tennessee Chattanooga, Knoxville, Memphis, and Nashville $1,284,884 Texas Amarillo, Arlington, Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Garland, Houston, Irving, Lubbock, San Antonio, and Southern Rio Grande $4,175,873 Utah Salt Lake City $321,221 Virginia Arlington County, Chesapeake, Newport News, Norfolk, Richmond, and Virginia Beach $1,927,326 Washington Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma $963,663 Wisconsin Madison and Milwaukee $642,442 Total $39,831,404 11 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM 4. FY 2008 CCP Allocations. CCP allocations are determined using the USA PATRIOT Act formula, which specifies that all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico will receive a minimum of 0.75 percent of the total available grant funding, and that four Territories (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) will receive a minimum of 0.25 percent of the total available grant funding. The balance of CCP funds are distributed on a population-share basis. In addition to CCP allocations, States and Urban Areas are encouraged to fully leverage all HSGP resources to accomplish the Citizen Corps mission. FY 2008 CCP Funding Allocations State/Territory Allocation State/Territory Allocation Alabama $242,635 Nevada $183,210 Alaska $128,987 New Hampshire $147,207 Arizona $291,932 New Jersey $359,560 Arkansas $190,973 New Mexico $166,053 California $1,162,496 New York $665,317 Colorado $249,368 North Carolina $370,368 Connecticut $210,206 North Dakota $127,726 Delaware $134,210 Ohio $439,689 District of Columbia $126,244 Oklahoma $213,519 Florida $635,164 Oregon $217,269 Georgia $384,305 Pennsylvania $467,518 Hawaii $146,272 Rhode Island $139,773 Idaho $152,496 South Carolina $236,293 Illinois $479,613 South Dakota $132,235 Indiana $292,120 Tennessee $286,687 Iowa $195,388 Texas $798,047 Kansas $189,278 Utah $185,514 Kentucky $231,503 Vermont $127,194 Louisiana $232,993 Virginia $331,501 Maine $147,246 Washington $295,668 Maryland $271,175 West Virginia $161,504 Massachusetts $295,130 Wisconsin $270,693 Michigan $399,492 Wyoming $124,358 Minnesota $259,052 Puerto Rico $149,996 Mississippi $193,393 U.S. Virgin Islands $39,556 Missouri $278,668 American Samoa $38,092 Montana $136,893 Guam $41,429 Nebraska $160,424 Northern Mariana Islands $38,867 Total $14,572,500 12 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM B. Eligible Applicants and Role of State Administrative Agencies. The Governor of each State and Territory is required to designate a State Administrative Agency (SAA) to apply for and administer the funds awarded under HSGP. The SAA is the only entity eligible to formally apply for HSGP funds. FEMA requires that the SAA be responsible for obligating HSGP funds to local units of government and other designated recipients within 45 days after receipt of funds. 2 In addition, to be eligible to receive FY 2008 HSGP funding, applicants must meet NIMS compliance requirements. State, Territory, Tribal, and local governments are considered to be in full NIMS compliance if they have adopted and/or implemented the FY 2007 compliance activities, as determined by the National Incident Management System Capability Assessment Support Tool (NIMSCAST) or other accepted means. Additional information on achieving compliance is available through the FEMA National Integration Center (NIC) at http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/. For FY 2008, the NIMSCAST will be the required means to report NIMS compliance for FY 2009 preparedness award eligibility. All State and Territory direct preparedness awardees will be required to submit their compliance assessment via the NIMSCAST by September 30, 2008. The State or Territory department/agency awardee reserves the right to determine compliance reporting requirements of their sub-awardees (locals) in order to disperse funds at the local level. 2 As defined in the Conference Report accompanying the DHS Appropriations Act of 2008, the term “local unit of government” means “any county, city, village, town, district, borough, parish, port authority, transit authority, intercity rail provider, commuter rail system, freight rail provider, water district, regional planning commission, council of government, Indian tribe with jurisdiction over Indian country, authorized Tribal organization, Alaska Native village, independent authority, special district, or other political subdivision of any State.” 13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART II. APPLICATION AND EVALUATION PROCESS This section summarizes the overall timetable for the FY 2008 HSGP and core process and priorities that will be used to assess applications under the FY 2008 program. The next section provides detailed information about specific application requirements and the process for submission of applications. A. Overview -- Application Deadline and Review Process. For specific application instructions, please refer to Appendix E, FY 2008 HSGP Application Requirements. Completed Applications must be submitted no later than 11:59 PM EDT, May 1, 2008. FEMA will evaluate and act on applications within 90 days following close of the application period. With respect to SHSP and UASI, the FY 2008 HSGP will use risk- based prioritization consistent with FEMA policy outlined in this guidance document. Each applicant’s final funding allocation will be determined using a combination of the results of the risk and effectiveness analyses. The following process will be used to make awards under the program: • FEMA will verify compliance with all administrative and eligibility criteria identified in the application kit, to include the required submission of Investment Justifications and State Preparedness Reports by the established due dates. • Eligible applications will be reviewed and scored through a State and local peer review process to analyze the anticipated effectiveness of proposed Investments. State Preparedness Reports will be reviewed by the peer review panels for context, but will not be scored. • FEMA will use the results of both the risk analysis and the peer review to make recommendations for funding to the Secretary of Homeland Security. Applicants must comply with all administrative requirements — including submitting Investment Justifications and also ensuring that their State Preparedness Report is submitted to FEMA not later than March 31, 2008 — described herein. Having met all administrative requirements, applications will be evaluated through the peer review process for completeness, adherence to programmatic guidelines, feasibility, and how well the proposed Investment addresses the identified need(s) or capability shortfall(s). The Investment Justification requires narrative on strategic alignment, funding plan, milestones, project management, potential challenges, impact, and sustainability for each proposal. This information will be used to evaluate the anticipated effectiveness of all proposed Investments. Investment Justification questions and scoring criteria are included in Appendix D. Grantees should also refer to the FY 2008 HSGP Investment 14 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Justification Reference Guide for assistance in the formulation of State and UASI Investment Justifications. B. Grant Application Support from FEMA. During the application period FEMA will identify multiple opportunities for a cooperative dialogue between the Department and applicants through such processes as the midterm review. This commitment is intended to ensure a common understanding of the funding priorities and administrative requirements associated with the FY 2008 HSGP, and to help in submission of projects that will have the highest impact on reducing risks. 15 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART III. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS This section provides detailed information about specific application requirements and the process for submission of applications. A. General Program Requirements. The applicable SAAs will be responsible for administration of the FY 2008 HSGP. In administering the program, the SAA must work with the eligible applicants to comply with the following general requirements: 1. Grant funds. The SAA must obligate 80 percent of the funds awarded under SHSP and UASI to local units of government within 45 days of receipt of the funds. For Puerto Rico, the SAA must also obligate 80 percent of the funds to local units of government within 45 days of receipt of the funds (as opposed to obligating 50 percent of funds within 60 days as noted in the FY 2007 HSGP). Additionally, no pass-through requirements will be applied to the District of Columbia, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Any UASI funds retained by the SAA must be used to directly support the designated Urban Areas in the State. States must obligate 100 percent of MMRS grant funds within 45 days of receipt. There are no obligation requirements for CCP. However, if funds are retained, consultation with local Citizen Corps Councils is required to ensure funds are expended in a manner that supports local or statewide efforts to educate, train, and involve citizens. Jurisdictions are encouraged to leverage available funding resources to support community preparedness and participation. For SHSP and UASI programs involving obligation of funds, the State may retain some of the allocation of grant funds for expenditures made by the State on behalf of the local unit of government or Urban Area jurisdiction. This may occur only with the written consent of the local unit of government or Urban Area jurisdiction, with the written consent specifying the amount of funds to be retained and the intended use of funds. If a written consent agreement is already in place from FY 2007, FEMA will continue to recognize it for FY 2008. If any modifications to the existing agreement are necessary to reflect new initiatives, States should contact their assigned Preparedness Officer. As noted before, FY 2008 HSGP will focus on three objectives as its highest priorities, of which at least 25 percent of HSGP funds must be dedicated to the last two: • Measuring progress in achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines • Strengthening improvised explosive device (IED) deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities • Strengthening preparedness planning 16 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Per the 9/11 Act and Homeland Security Appropriation Act of 2008, FY 2008 HSGP will not contain a separate line-item Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP). However, States are still required to ensure that at least 25 percent of their SHSP award funds and 25 percent of their UASI award funds are dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. FEMA will track the congressionally-mandated obligation of funds to local units of government through each State’s Initial Strategy Implementation Plan. In addition, FEMA strongly encourages the timely obligation of funds from local units of government to other subgrantees, as appropriate. 2. Management and Administration (M&A) limits. A maximum of up to three percent (3%) of funds awarded may be retained by the State, and any funds retained are to be used solely for management and administrative purposes associated with the HSGP award. States may pass through a portion of the State M&A allocation to local subgrantees to support local management and administration activities; the overall subgrantee M&A amount may not equal more than three percent (3%). 3. Cash-Match Requirements. Grantees are not required to engage in cash or in-kind match for FY 2008 HSGP funds. However, there is the potential for future grant programs to be impacted by cash match requirements as early FY 2009. Accordingly, grantees should anticipate and plan for future homeland security programs to require cash or in-kind matches at cost-share levels comparable to other FEMA-administered grant programs. 17 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART IV. GENERAL HSGP ALLOWABLE COSTS GUIDANCE The following pages outline global allowable costs guidance applicable to all programs included in the HSGP. A crosswalk of allowable costs across grant programs can be found in Appendix B. As a reminder, FY 2008 HSGP will focus on three objectives as its highest priorities: 1. Measuring progress in achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines 2. Strengthening improvised explosive device (IED) deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities 3. Strengthening preparedness planning At least 25 percent of FY 2008 HSGP (State Homeland Security Program [SHSP], Urban Areas Security Initiative [UASI], Metropolitan Medical Response System [MMRS], and Citizen Corps Program [CCP]) funding must be allocated to objectives 2 and 3. At least 25 percent of SHSP award funds and 25 percent of UASI award funds must be dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. 1. Planning Activities. States and Urban Areas are strongly encouraged to use FY 2008 HSGP funds for planning efforts that enable them to prioritize needs, build capabilities, update preparedness strategies, allocate resources, and deliver preparedness programs across disciplines (e.g., law enforcement, fire, emergency medical service (EMS), public health, behavioral health, public works, agriculture, and information technology) and levels of government. Planning activities should focus on the four homeland security mission areas of prevention, protection, response, and recovery. All jurisdictions are encouraged to work through Citizen Corps Councils, non-governmental entities, and the general public in planning activities.3 Allowable planning costs include: • Developing scenario plans that incorporate the range of prevention, protection, response, and recovery activities for a scenario • Developing and implementing homeland security support programs and adopting DHS national initiatives • Developing related terrorism prevention activities • Developing and enhancing plans and protocols • Developing or conducting assessments 3 Non-governmental entities include the private sector and private non-profit, faith-based, community, volunteer and other non-governmental organizations. 18 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Examples of allowable planning costs can be found at http://www.fema.gov/grants. 2. Organization Activities (SHSP and UASI only). States and Urban Areas must justify proposed expenditures of SHSP or UASI funds to support organization activities within their Investment Justification submission by using historical data or other analysis.4 For SHSP: a. Only States that do not contain a DHS-designated Urban Area and therefore do not receive a UASI award are allowed to utilize SHSP funding for Organizational Activities. For States which do not receive a FY 2008 UASI award, no more than 15 percent of their SHSP award amount may be used for operational expenses and overtime costs for the three (3) Organizational Activities noted below. For UASI: b. No more than 25 percent of each individual UASI award amount may be used for operational expenses and overtime costs for the three (3) Organizational Activities noted below. 1. Operational Overtime Costs. In support of efforts to enhance capabilities for detecting, deterring, disrupting, and preventing acts of terrorism, operational overtime costs are allowable for increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites during DHS-declared periods of Orange or Red threat levels. Subject to these elevated threat level conditions, FY 2008 SHSP or UASI funds for organizational costs may be used to support select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites in the following authorized categories: • Backfill and overtime expenses (as defined in this guidance) for staffing State or local fusion centers • Hiring of contracted security for critical infrastructure sites • Public safety overtime (as defined in this guidance) • National Guard deployments to protect critical infrastructure sites, including all resources that are part of the standard National Guard deployment package • Increased border security activities in coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), as outlined in Information Bulletin #135 Consumable costs, such as fuel expenses, are not allowed except as part of the standard National Guard deployment package. 4 The effectiveness of a request for the use of funds for allowable organizational costs will be judged on the Investment Justification to illustrate the need for such resources to effectively achieve a capability that will have a meaningful impact in the reduction of risk. 19 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM States with UASI jurisdictions can use funds retained at the State level to reimburse eligible operational overtime expenses incurred by the State (per the above guidance limitations and up to a maximum of 15 percent of the State share of the UASI grant). However, those activities must directly support increased security measures enacted in the UASI jurisdictions. 2. Overtime Costs. Overtime costs (as defined in this guidance) are allowable for personnel to participate in information, investigative, and intelligence sharing activities specifically related to homeland security. This includes activities such as anti-terrorism task forces, JTTFs, Area Maritime Security Committees (as required by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002), DHS Border Enforcement Security Task Forces, and Integrated Border Enforcement Teams. 3. Intelligence Analysts. SHSP and UASI funds may be used to hire new staff and/or contractor positions to serve as intelligence analysts to enable information/intelligence sharing capabilities. In order to be hired as an intelligence analyst, staff and/or contractor personnel must meet at least one of the following criteria: • Successfully complete training to ensure baseline proficiency in intelligence analysis and production within six months of being hired; and/or, • Previously served as an intelligence analyst for a minimum of two years either in a Federal intelligence agency, the military, or State and/or local law enforcement intelligence unit. Costs associated with hiring new intelligence analysts are allowable only for two years, after which States and Urban Areas shall be responsible for supporting the sustainment costs for those intelligence analysts. Use of funds for the hiring of intelligence analysts represents a commitment by the grantee to sustain Federally-funded positions after the two-year Federal funding period with non-Federal funds. Failure to sustain such positions will result in disqualification of grantees from hiring analysts with Federal funds in future program years. In order to receive funds for hiring intelligence analysts, the SAA must retain certification on file stating that the responsible jurisdiction will assume responsibility for supporting the costs of the hired analysts following the two-year Federal funding period. This certification must also be accompanied by a budget plan providing the details of this arrangement. All intelligence analyst training should be in accordance with Global’s Minimum Criminal Intelligence Training Standards for Law Enforcement and Other Criminal Justice Agencies in the United States, which outlines the minimum categories of training needed for intelligence analysts. These include subject-matter expertise, analytic methodologies, customer-service ethics, information handling and processing skills, critical thinking skills, 20 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM computer literacy, and objectivity and intellectual honesty. A certificate of completion of such training must be on file with the SAA and must be made available to Preparedness Officers upon request. 3. Equipment Activities. The 21 allowable prevention, protection, response, and recovery equipment categories and equipment standards for FY 2008 HSGP are listed on the web-based version of the Authorized Equipment List (AEL) on the Responder Knowledge Base (RKB), at http://www.rkb.us. The Standardized Equipment List (SEL) is located at this site as well. In some cases, items on the SEL are not allowable under HSGP or will not be eligible for purchase unless specific conditions are met. Unless otherwise stated, equipment must meet all mandatory regulatory and/or DHS-adopted standards to be eligible for purchase using these funds. In addition, agencies will be responsible for obtaining and maintaining all necessary certifications and licenses for the requested equipment. 4. Training Activities. States, Territories, and Urban Areas are strongly encouraged to use HSGP funds to develop a State/Territory homeland security training program. Allowable training-related costs under HSGP include the establishment, support, conduct, and attendance of training specifically identified under the SHSP, UASI, MMRS, and CCP grant programs. Allowable training topics include, but are not limited to, CBRNE terrorism, cyber/agriculture/food security, intelligence gathering and analysis, NIMS related training, citizen and community preparedness, and training for volunteers. Training conducted using HSGP funds should address a performance gap identified through an After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) or contribute to building a capability that will be evaluated through an exercise. Exercises should be used to provide the opportunity to demonstrate and validate skills learned in training, as well as to identify training gaps. Any training or training gaps should be identified in the AAR/IP and addressed in the State or Urban Area training cycle. All training and exercises conducted with HSGP funds should support the development and testing of the jurisdiction’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) or specific annexes, where applicable. Additional information regarding training is located in Appendix C. 5. Exercise Activities. Exercises conducted with FEMA support must be managed and executed in accordance with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). HSEEP Volumes I-III contain guidance for exercise design, development, conduct, evaluation and improvement planning. HSEEP Volume IV provides sample exercise materials and HSEEP Volume V: Prevention Exercises contains guidance and 21 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM recommendations for designing, developing, conducting, and evaluating prevention- focused exercises. All volumes can be found at http://hseep.dhs.gov. All exercises using HSGP funding must be NIMS compliant. More information is available online at the NIMS Integration Center, http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/index.shtm. Additional information regarding exercises is located in Appendix C. 6. Personnel Activities. Personnel hiring, overtime, and backfill expenses are permitted under this grant in order to perform allowable FY 2008 HSGP planning, training, exercise, and equipment activities. • For SHSP and UASI, a personnel cap of up to 15 percent of each of the total program funds may be used. Grantees who wish to seek a waiver from the 15 percent personnel cap must provide documentation explaining why the 15 percent personnel cap is unacceptable; waiver requests will be considered only under extreme circumstances. • For MMRS or CCP, the 15 percent personnel cap ceiling does not apply. • The category of personnel costs does not apply to contractors. FY 2008 HSGP funds may not be used to support the hiring of any personnel for the purposes of fulfilling traditional public safety duties or to supplant traditional public safety positions and responsibilities. The following are definitions for the terms as used in this grant guidance: • Hiring – State and local entities may use grant funding to cover the salary of newly hired personnel who are exclusively undertaking allowable FEMA program activities as specified in this guidance. This may not include new personnel who are hired to fulfill any non-FEMA program activities under any circumstances. Hiring will always result in a net increase of FTEs. • Overtime – These expenses are limited to the additional costs which result from personnel working over and above 40 hours of weekly work time as a direct result of their performance of FEMA-approved activities specified in this guidance. Overtime associated with any other activity is not eligible. • Backfill-related Overtime – Also called “Overtime as Backfill,” these expenses are limited to overtime costs which result from personnel who are working overtime (as identified above) to perform the duties of other personnel who are temporarily assigned to FEMA-approved activities outside their core responsibilities. Backfill-related overtime only includes the difference between the overtime rate paid and what would have otherwise been paid to the backfilling employee for regular time. Under no circumstances should the entire amount of backfill overtime expense be charged to an award. Neither overtime 22 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM nor backfill expenses are the result of an increase of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) employees. • Supplanting – Replacing a currently State and/or locally budgeted position with one or more full-time employees or contracted supported in whole or in part with Federal funds. Management and Administration (M&A) limits. A maximum of up to three percent (3%) of funds awarded may be retained by the State, and any funds retained are to be used solely for management and administrative purposes associated with the HSGP award. States may pass through a portion of the State M&A allocation to local subgrantees to support local management and administration activities; the overall subgrantee M&A amount may not equal more than three percent (3%). 7. Construction and Renovation. Use of HSGP funds for construction and renovation is generally prohibited except as outlined below. Such construction and renovation shall be strictly limited and allowable only when it is a necessary component of a security system at critical infrastructure facilities. CCP and MMRS funds may not be used for any type of construction or renovation. Project construction and renovation not exceeding $1,000,000 is allowable, as deemed necessary. The following types of projects are considered to constitute construction or renovation, and must be submitted to FEMA for compliance review under Federal environmental planning and historic preservation (EHP) laws and requirements prior to initiation of the project: • Construction of and renovation to guard facilities • Renovation of and modifications, including the installation of security and communication equipment, to buildings and structures that are 50 years old or older • Any other construction or renovation efforts that change or expand the footprint of a facility or structure, including security enhancements to improve perimeter security. • Physical security enhancements, including but not limited to: o Lighting o Fencing o Closed-circuit television (CCTV) systems o Motion detection systems o Barriers, doors, gates and related security enhancements In addition, the erection of communications towers that are included in a jurisdiction’s interoperable communications plan is allowed, subject to all applicable laws, regulations, and licensing provisions. Communication tower projects must be submitted to FEMA for EHP review. 23 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM In order to draw down funds for construction and renovation costs under HSGP grantees must provide to FEMA: • A description of the asset or facility, asset location, whether the infrastructure is publicly or privately owned, and the construction or renovation project • Certification that a facility vulnerability assessment has been conducted • An outline addressing how the construction or renovation project will address the identified vulnerabilities from the assessment • Consequences of not implementing the construction or renovation project • Any additional information requested by FEMA to ensure compliance with Federal environmental and historic preservation requirements. Grantees should refer to FEMA’s Information Bulletin #271, Environmental and Planning and Historic Preservation Requirements for Grants. 24 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART V. ALLOWABLE COSTS GUIDANCE LAW ENFORCMENT TERRORISM PREVENTION-ORIENTED ALLOWABLE COSTS As noted previously, the 9/11 Act and FY 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act removed appropriations specific for the LETPP. However, the Department still values and places an emphasis on law enforcement terrorism prevention and protection- oriented activities. States are still required to ensure that at least 25 percent of their SHSP award funds and at least 25 percent of their UASI award funds are dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. The broad parameters of the historical LETPP program are still allowable under SHSP and UASI. These include the following activities: • Information sharing and analysis; • Target hardening; • Threat recognition; • Terrorist interdiction; • Subject to the limitations on Organization and Personnel Costs outlined above, overtime expenses consistent with a State Homeland Security Plan, including for the provision of enhanced law enforcement operations in support of Federal agencies, including for increased border security and border crossing enforcement; • Subject to the limitations on Organization and Personnel Costs outlined above, establishing, enhancing, and staffing with appropriately qualified personnel State, local, and regional fusion centers; • Subject to the limitations on Organization and Personnel Costs outlined above, paying salaries and benefits for personnel, including individuals employed by the grant recipient on the date of the relevant grant application, to serve as qualified intelligence analysts; For more specific information on allowable costs under this heading, please see the SHSP and UASI sections of this grant package. Additionally, please refer to Appendix C, HSGP Allowable Expenses, Additional Information, for specific examples on allowable law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, training, and exercise activities. 25 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART VI. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM The State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) is a core assistance program that provides funds to build capabilities at the State and local levels and to implement the goals and objectives included in State Homeland Security Strategies and initiatives in the State Preparedness Report. Activities implemented under SHSP must support terrorism preparedness by building or enhancing capabilities that relate to the prevention of, protection from, or response to terrorism in order to be considered eligible. However, many capabilities which support terrorism preparedness simultaneously support preparedness for other hazards. Grantees must demonstrate this dual-use quality for any activities implemented under this program that are not explicitly focused on terrorism preparedness. A. Program Requirements. Use of SHSP funds must be consistent with and supportive of implementation of the State Homeland Security Strategy and State Preparedness Report. Linkages between specific projects undertaken with SHSP funds and strategic goals and objectives will be highlighted through regular required reporting mechanisms, including the Biannual Strategy Implementation Report (BSIR). As a reminder, FY 2008 HSGP will focus on three objectives as its highest priorities: 1. Measuring progress in achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines 2. Strengthening improvised explosive device (IED) deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities 3. Strengthening preparedness planning At least 25 percent of FY 2008 HSGP (State Homeland Security Program [SHSP], Urban Areas Security Initiative [UASI], Metropolitan Medical Response System [MMRS], and Citizen Corps Program [CCP]) funding must be allocated to objectives 2 and 3. At least 25 percent of SHSP award funds must be dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. B. Authorized Program Expenditures. This section provides guidance on the types of expenditures that are allowable under SHSP. Please refer to Appendix B for a summary of authorized SHSP expenditures. In addition to the expenditures outlined below, SHSP funds can be used to support activities related to secure identification. Activities that facilitate secure identification, 26 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM including IT enhancements for identification management and verification systems, are a priority. DHS is currently developing and implementing a number of high profile screening programs in which secure identification credentials figure prominently. These include REAL ID, enhancing driver’s licenses to be used as secure border-crossing documents, Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC), and the credentialing of First Responders. REAL ID addresses a key recommendation of the 9/11 Commission Report to enhance the security, integrity and protection of licensing and identification systems across the country. REAL ID can help States improve State driver’s license and ID card issuance capabilities and enable States to work collectively to develop more secure systems to verify a person’s identity, while at the same time protecting the privacy of the applicant’s personal identification information. Specific allowable activities include: planning activities related to REAL ID, personal identification verification systems enhancements; personnel and management costs related to REAL ID activities; and acquisitions for hardware and software related to REAL ID technologies. TWICs are tamper-resistant biometric credentials for workers who require unescorted access to secure areas of ports, vessels, outer continental shelf facilities and all credentialed merchant mariners. Specific allowable activities include: projects that involve new installations or upgrades to access control and identity management systems that exhibit compliance with TWIC standards and program specifications. The credentialing of First Responders aims to enhance real-time electronic authentication of identity and attribute(s) (qualification, certification, authorization, and/or privilege) of emergency response/critical government personnel responding to terrorist attacks or other catastrophic events. Specific allowable activities include: standards-based technologies, policies, protocols, and practices for a portable and functional solution, which could include training or exercises. 1. Planning Activities. SHSP funds may be used for a broad range of homeland security planning activities. Please refer to Part IV, Allowable Costs Guidance, (1) Planning Activities. 2. Organizational Activities. For SHSP: Only States which do not contain a DHS-designated Urban Area and therefore do not receive a UASI award are allowed to utilize SHSP funding for Organizational Activities. For States which do not receive a FY2008 UASI award, no more than 15 percent of their SHSP award amount may be used for operational expenses and overtime costs for the three (3) Organizational Activities noted below. 1. Operational Overtime Costs. In support of efforts to enhance capabilities for detecting, deterring, disrupting, and preventing acts of terrorism, operational overtime costs are allowable for increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites during DHS-declared periods of Orange or Red threat levels. Subject to these elevated threat level conditions, FY 2008 SHSP 27 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM funds for organizational costs may be used to support select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites in the following authorized categories: • Backfill and overtime expenses (as defined in this guidance) for staffing State or local fusion centers • Hiring of contracted security for critical infrastructure sites • Public safety overtime (as defined in this guidance) • National Guard deployments to protect critical infrastructure sites, including all resources that are part of the standard National Guard deployment package • Increased border security activities in coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), as outlined in Information Bulletin #135 Consumable costs, such as fuel expenses, are not allowed except as part of the standard National Guard deployment package. 2. Overtime Costs. Overtime costs (as defined in this guidance) are allowable for personnel to participate in information, investigative, and intelligence sharing activities specifically related to homeland security. This includes activities such as anti-terrorism task forces, JTTFs, Area Maritime Security Committees (as required by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002), DHS Border Enforcement Security Task Forces, and Integrated Border Enforcement Teams. 3. Intelligence Analysts. SHSP funds may be used to hire new staff and/or contractor positions to serve as intelligence analysts to enable information/intelligence sharing capabilities. In order to be hired as an intelligence analyst, staff and/or contractor personnel must meet at least one of the following criteria: • Successfully complete training to ensure baseline proficiency in intelligence analysis and production within six months of being hired; and/or, • Previously served as an intelligence analyst for a minimum of two years either in a Federal intelligence agency, the military, or State and/or local law enforcement intelligence unit. Costs associated with hiring new intelligence analysts are allowable only for two years, after which States shall be responsible for supporting the sustainment costs for those intelligence analysts. Use of funds for the hiring of intelligence analysts represents a commitment by the grantee to sustain Federally-funded positions after the two-year Federal funding period. Failure to sustain such positions will result in disqualification of grantees from hiring analysts with Federal funds in future program years. In order to receive funds for hiring intelligence analysts, the SAA must retain certification on file stating 28 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM that the responsible jurisdiction will assume responsibility for supporting the costs of the hired analysts following the two-year Federal funding period. This certification must also be accompanied by a budget plan providing the details of this arrangement. All intelligence analyst training should be in accordance with Global’s Minimum Criminal Intelligence Training Standards for Law Enforcement and Other Criminal Justice Agencies in the United States, which outlines the minimum categories of training needed for intelligence analysts. These include subject-matter expertise, analytic methodologies, customer-service ethics, information handling and processing skills, critical thinking skills, computer literacy, and objectivity and intellectual honesty. A certificate of completion of such training must be on file with the SAA and must be made available to Preparedness Officers upon request. Under no circumstances may eligible non-UASI States exceed 15 percent of their SHSP award for these activities. 3. Equipment Activities. FY 2008 SHSP funds may be used for prevention, protection, response, and recovery- oriented equipment acquisition from the 21 equipment categories listed in the AEL. The AEL is available in its entirety online through the RKB at http://www.rkb.us and the equipment categories are outlined in Appendix B. 4. Training Activities. SHSP funds may be used to enhance the capabilities of State and local government and non-governmental emergency preparedness and response personnel through development of a State homeland security training program. 5. Exercise Activities. SHSP funds may be used to design, develop, conduct, and evaluate exercises in accordance with the overarching guidance on exercises. 6. Personnel Activities. As noted previously, up to 15 percent of SHSP funds may be used to support the hiring of full or part time employees to perform allowable FY 2008 SHSP planning, training, exercise, and equipment activities. Grantees who wish to seek a waiver from the 15 percent personnel cap must provide hard and telling documentation explaining why the 15 percent personnel cap is unacceptable; waiver requests will be considered only under extreme circumstances. For more information please see Part IV, Allowable Costs Guidance, (6) Personnel. 29 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART VII. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: URBAN AREAS SECURITY INITIATIVE Since its inception in FY 2003, the intent of the UASI program has been to enhance regional preparedness in major metropolitan areas. The UASI program directly supports the National Priority on expanding regional collaboration in the National Preparedness Guidelines and is intended to assist participating jurisdictions in developing integrated regional systems for prevention, protection, response, and recovery. The FY 2008 UASI program continues this mission by providing financial assistance to address the unique multi-discipline planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high-threat, high-density Urban Areas, and to assist them in building and sustaining capabilities to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from threats or acts of terrorism. The FY 2008 UASI program is intended to enhance regional preparedness efforts. Urban Areas must use these funds to employ regional approaches to overall preparedness and are encouraged to adopt regional response structures whenever appropriate. UASI program implementation and governance must include regional partners and should have balanced representation among entities with operational responsibilities for prevention, protection, response, and recovery activities within the region. In some instances Urban Area boundaries cross State borders. States must ensure that the identified Urban Areas take an inclusive regional approach to the development and implementation of the FY 2008 UASI program and involve the contiguous jurisdictions, mutual aid partners, port authorities, rail and transit authorities, campus law enforcement, State agencies, Citizen Corps Council(s), and MMRS jurisdictions in their program activities. Activities implemented under UASI must support terrorism preparedness by building or enhancing capabilities that relate to the prevention of, protection from, or response to terrorism in order to be considered eligible. However, many capabilities which support terrorism preparedness simultaneously support preparedness for other hazards. Grantees must demonstrate the dual-use quality for any activities implemented that are not explicitly focused on terrorism preparedness. Pursuant to changes required by the 9/11 Act, eligible FY 2008 UASI candidates were determined based on an analysis of relative risk of the 100 most populous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), as defined by the Office of Management and Budget. MSAs are used by DHS to determine eligibility for participation in the program. Page Nine shows a table of Urban Areas selected for possible FY 2008 funding; Appendix A shows the MSAs queried as part of the overall risk methodology. Geographical areas queried do not equate to minimum mandated membership representation of an Urban Area, nor does this guarantee funding for geographical areas queried. Urban Area Working Groups (UAWGs) must continue to take a regional approach to membership but are not required to expand or contract existing Urban Area participation to conform to MSA composition as a result of this legislative change. Detailed information on MSAs is 30 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM publicly available from the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html. A. Program Requirements. The SAA will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the fiduciary and programmatic administration requirements of the FY 2008 UASI program. 1. Identify Points of Contact. The SAA must confirm a specific point of contact (POC) with the designated Urban Area. The SAA POCs are responsible for identifying and coordinating with the POC for the UAWG. This information must be provided to FEMA with the grant application. SAAs must work with existing Urban Areas to ensure that information for current POCs is on file with FEMA. 2. Establish the UAWG. Membership in the UAWG must provide either direct or indirect representation for all the jurisdictions and response disciplines (including law enforcement) that comprise the defined Urban Area. It must also be inclusive of local MMRS and Citizen Corps Council representatives. The SAA POC must ensure that appropriate representation for the defined Urban Area is included per this guidance. FEMA strongly encourages that, wherever possible, previously established local working groups should be leveraged for this purpose to ensure that UASI resources are managed in the most efficient and effective manner possible. The UAWG may also support State efforts to develop the State Preparedness Report, particularly as it relates to UASI activities. An overview of the UAWG structure and a list of members and their associated jurisdictions must be provided to FEMA along with the grant application. Urban Areas must notify the SAA of any updates to the UAWG structure or membership, of which the SAA must thereafter provide notification to FEMA. 3. Governance. The identified jurisdictions in Part I represent the candidate Urban Areas eligible to apply for funding. The UAWG will be responsible for coordinating development and implementation of all program initiatives. States and Urban Areas must consider including counties within which the cities reside, contiguous jurisdictions, MSAs, operational areas, and mutual aid partners, as appropriate, in the governance process. In keeping with sound project management practices, the UAWG must ensure that its approach to critical issues such as membership, governance structure, voting rights, grant management and administration responsibilities, and funding allocation methodologies are formalized in a working group charter or other form of standard operating procedure related to the UASI governance. The charter must also outline how decisions made in UAWG meetings will be documented and shared with UAWG members. This charter must be on file with FEMA prior to drawing down FY 2008 UASI funding and must be available to all UAWG members to promote transparency in decision-making related to the UASI program. 4. Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy. Urban Areas must utilize their Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy as the basis for requesting funds to support 31 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Investments identified in the Investment Justification. There must be a clear correlation between the goals, objectives, and priorities identified in the Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy and FY 2008 UASI program activities. In addition, the Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy must also be consistent with and supportive of the State Homeland Security Strategy and the State Preparedness Report. All Urban Areas receiving funding in FY 2008 must have an approved Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy. Any new Urban Areas must develop a strategy and submit it to FEMA for review and approval prior to drawing down UASI funds; this includes prior Urban Areas who were not Urban Areas in either FY 2006 and/or 2007, but who were selected again as Urban Areas for FY 2008. For new Urban Areas, strategy development technical assistance is available; please consult your SAA for requesting assistance services from FEMA. 5. Allocation of funds. As a reminder, FY 2008 HSGP will focus on three objectives as its highest priorities: 1. Measuring progress in achieving the National Preparedness Guidelines 2. Strengthening improvised explosive device (IED) deterrence, prevention, and protection capabilities 3. Strengthening preparedness planning At least 25 percent of FY 2008 HSGP (State Homeland Security Program [SHSP], Urban Areas Security Initiative [UASI], Metropolitan Medical Response System [MMRS], and Citizen Corps Program [CCP]) funding must be allocated to objectives 2 and 3. At least 25 percent of UASI funds must be dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities. The use and allocation of all grant funds available through the FY 2008 UASI program must focus on the investments identified in the Urban Area’s Investment Justification and the implementation of the validated Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy. The use of funds must also be consistent with the State Homeland Security Strategy, the State Preparedness Report, the National Preparedness Guidelines, TCL and UASI program guidelines. Funds used to support Citizen Corps related efforts, such as citizen preparedness, volunteer participation, and the integration of non-governmental resources should be coordinated with Citizen Corps Councils. The UAWG, in coordination with the SAA POC, must develop a methodology for allocating funding available through the UASI program. The UAWG must reach consensus on all UASI funding allocations. If consensus can not be reached within the 45-day time period allotted for the State to obligate funds to subgrantees, the SAA must make the allocation determination. The SAA must provide written documentation verifying the consensus of the UAWG, or the failure to achieve otherwise, on the allocation of funds and submit it to FEMA immediately after the 45-day time period allotted for the State to obligate funds to subgrantees. 32 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Any UASI funds retained by the State must be used in direct support of the Urban Area. States must provide documentation to the UAWG and DHS upon request demonstrating how any UASI funds retained by the State would directly support the Urban Area. B. Authorized Program Expenditures. This section provides guidance on the types of expenditures that are allowable under UASI. Please refer to the checklist in Appendix B for a summary of authorized UASI expenditures. 1. Planning Activities. UASI funds may be used for a broad range of homeland security planning activities. Please refer to Part IV, Allowable Costs Guidance, (1) Planning Activities. 2. Organizational Activities. States and Urban Areas may use FY 2008 UASI funds to support select organization activities. States and Urban Areas must justify proposed expenditures of UASI funds to support organization activities within their Investment Justification submission by using historical data or other analysis. For UASIs: No more than 25 percent of each individual UASI award amount may be used for operational expenses and overtime costs for the three (3) Organizational Activities noted below. 1. Operational Overtime Costs. In support of efforts to enhance capabilities for detecting, deterring, disrupting, and preventing acts of terrorism, operational overtime costs are allowable for increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites during DHS-declared periods of Orange or Red threat levels. Subject to these elevated threat level conditions, FY 2008 UASI funds for organizational costs may be used to support select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites in the following authorized categories: • Backfill and overtime expenses (as defined in this guidance) for staffing State or local fusion centers • Hiring of contracted security for critical infrastructure sites • Public safety overtime (as defined in this guidance) • National Guard deployments to protect critical infrastructure sites, including all resources that are part of the standard National Guard deployment package • Increased border security activities in coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), as outlined in Information Bulletin #135 33 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Consumable costs, such as fuel expenses, are not allowed except as part of the standard National Guard deployment package. States with UASI jurisdictions can use funds retained at the State level to reimburse eligible operational overtime expenses incurred by the State (per the above guidance limitations and up to a maximum of 15 percent of the State share of the UASI grant). However, those activities must directly support increased security measures enacted in the UASI jurisdictions. 2. Overtime Costs. Overtime costs (as defined in this guidance) are allowable for personnel to participate in information, investigative, and intelligence sharing activities specifically related to homeland security. This includes activities such as anti-terrorism task forces, JTTFs, Area Maritime Security Committees (as required by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002), DHS Border Enforcement Security Task Forces, and Integrated Border Enforcement Teams. 3. Intelligence Analysts. UASI funds may be used to hire new staff and/or contractor positions to serve as intelligence analysts to enable information/intelligence sharing capabilities. In order to be hired as an intelligence analyst, staff and/or contractor personnel must meet at least one of the following criteria: • Successfully complete training to ensure baseline proficiency in intelligence analysis and production within six months of being hired; and/or, • Previously served as an intelligence analyst for a minimum of two years either in a Federal intelligence agency, the military, or State and/or local law enforcement intelligence unit. Costs associated with hiring new intelligence analysts are allowable only for two years, after which States and Urban Areas shall be responsible for supporting the sustainment costs for those intelligence analysts. Use of funds for the hiring of intelligence analysts represents a commitment by the grantee to sustain Federally-funded positions after the two-year Federal funding period with non-Federal resources. Failure to sustain such positions will result in disqualification of grantees from hiring analysts with Federal funds in future program years. In order to receive funds for hiring intelligence analysts, the SAA must retain certification on file stating that the responsible jurisdiction will assume responsibility for supporting the costs of the hired analysts following the two-year Federal funding period. This certification must also be accompanied by a budget plan providing the details of this arrangement. All intelligence analyst training should be in accordance with Global’s Minimum Criminal Intelligence Training Standards for Law Enforcement and Other Criminal Justice Agencies in the United States, which outlines the 34 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM minimum categories of training needed for intelligence analysts. These include subject-matter expertise, analytic methodologies, customer-service ethics, information handling and processing skills, critical thinking skills, computer literacy, and objectivity and intellectual honesty. A certificate of completion of such training must be on file with the SAA and must be made available to Preparedness Officers upon request. Under no circumstances may jurisdictions exceed 25 percent of their UASI award for these activities. 3. Equipment Activities. UASI funds may be used for prevention, protection, response, and recovery-oriented equipment acquisition from the 21 equipment categories listed in the AEL. The AEL is at http://www.rkb.us and the equipment categories are outlined in Appendix B. 4. Training Activities. FY 2008 UASI funds may be used to enhance the capabilities of State and local government and non-governmental emergency preparedness and response personnel through development of a State homeland security training program. See Appendix C for additional information. 5. Exercise Activities. All Urban Areas are required to develop a Multi-year Training and Exercise Plan and submit it to FEMA on an annual basis. This plan must tie into the Multi-year Training and Exercise Plan developed by the State and aligns with the Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy. Further, Urban Areas are encouraged to develop a Multi-year Plan and Schedule that takes into consideration anticipated training needs of the Urban Area for at least the immediate year, with exercises being timed to provide responders the opportunity to utilize training received. Further guidance concerning Training and Exercise Plan Workshops can be found in the HSEEP Volumes. Urban Areas are eligible to apply for exercise direct support, but must do so in coordination with the SAA. Direct support exercises provided to Urban Areas will count against the amount of direct support allotted to the State for FY 2008. 6. Personnel. As noted previously, up to 15 percent of UASI funds may be used to support the hiring of full or part time employees to perform allowable FY 2008 UASI planning, training, exercise, and equipment activities. Grantees who wish to seek a waiver from the 15 personnel cap must provide hard and telling documentation explaining why the 15 percent personnel cap is unacceptable; waiver requests will be considered only under extreme circumstances. For more information please see Part IV, Allowable Costs Guidance, (6) Personnel. 35 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART VIII. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: METROPOLITAN MEDICAL RESPONSE SYSTEM The FY 2008 MMRS program provides funding to designated localities to assist in maintaining and updating plans, delivering training, purchasing equipment and pharmaceuticals, and conducting exercises. The mission of MMRS is to enhance local medical incident management’s ability to coordinate and respond to a mass casualty event during the crucial first hours, until significant external resources arrive and become operational. MMRS provides the platform for rapid and efficient integration of State and Federal medical resources into the local incident management system. Through its established multi-agency, collaborative planning framework, the MMRS program also promotes effective regional coordination of mutual aid with neighboring localities (MMRS “Operational Area”). Additional information is provided at http://www.fema.gov/mmrs. The FY 2008 MMRS Program will support the MMRS jurisdictions in: • Achieving preparedness in MMRS-related Target Capabilities/Capability Focus Areas, in accordance with the National Preparedness Guidelines • Ensuring that MMRS strategic goals, objectives, operational capabilities, resource requirements, and operational plans correlate with State and Urban Area Homeland Security Assessments and Strategies • Increasing collaboration with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, specifically the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Hospital Preparedness Program and the Healthcare Facilities Partnership Program • Continuing the distinct capability enhancements required for pandemic influenza preparedness • Maintaining the MMRS capabilities established through the completion of deliverables and other requirements promulgated in previous federal funding guidance documents and related directives The Target Capabilities List (TCL) identifies and defines 37 specific capabilities that the Nation may need to achieve and sustain, depending on relevant risks and threats, in order to be prepared. MMRS jurisdictions are uniquely suited to plan, organize, staff, equip, train and exercise to achieve many of the desired outcomes for one distinct capability: Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment. Therefore, jurisdictions must give priority attention to improving Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment capability within their operational area. Jurisdictions should give additional consideration to the remaining 10 supporting capabilities, but also have the option of using grant funds to improve any of the other capabilities listed in the FY 2008 HSGP Supplemental Resource: MMRS Target Capabilities/ Capability Focus Areas and Community 36 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Preparedness, in cooperation with State and/or UASI strategies related to medical mass casualty preparedness and response. A. Program Requirements. 1. Allocation of funds. States must obligate 100 percent of MMRS grant funds. SAAs, in coordination with other relevant State government elements, such as public health, are expected to ensure that local MMRS representation exists within the Senior Advisory Committee body, and MMRS jurisdictions are able to seek information from, and provide information to, that body. 2. MMRS Priority Target Capabilities/Capability Focus Areas (TC/CFA). The listing below constitutes the primary MMRS Target Capabilities/Capability Focus Areas (TCs/CFAs) for FY 2008. In addition to the primary focus of Emergency Triage and Pre- Hospital Treatment, MMRS jurisdictions are expected to select from the TCs/CFAs below as their FY 2008 work effort. Jurisdictions also have the option of using grant funds to improve any of the other Target Capabilities listed in the FY 2008 HSGP Supplemental Resource: MMRS Target Capabilities/ Capability Focus Areas and Community Preparedness, provided they are reflected in the relevant State and/or Urban Area strategies, State Preparedness Report, and Investment Justifications. MMRS jurisdictions must also sustain capabilities achieved through the implementation of prior years’ program guidance, deliverables, and funding. 1. Medical Surge 2. Mass Prophylaxis 3. WMD/Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination 4. Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment 5. Medical Supplies Management and Distribution 6. Emergency Public Information and Warning 7. Interoperable Communications 8. Information Sharing and Collaboration 9. Regional Collaboration 10.Fatality Management 11.Isolation and Quarantine The MMRS Supplemental Resource is available at http://www.fema.gov/grants. 3. Pandemic influenza preparedness. An overarching requirement for MMRS jurisdictions is the revision and updating of Continuity of Operations/Continuity of Government (COOP/COG) plans for medical, mental health, and public health functions, and their supporting infrastructure, throughout the MMRS Operational Area. Key aspects of this activity include: • Updating COOP/COG plans to include clear lines of succession for key management positions; protection of essential records, facilities, equipment, and 37 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM personnel; operation of alternate facilities; and interoperable emergency communications • Reviewing mutual aid agreements to ensure they address the sharing of resources, and related provisions for managing critical infrastructure and key assets, including facilities, personnel, equipment and supplies • Stockpiling and priority dispensing of influenza vaccines and anti-viral medications The CDC-PHEP FY 2007 Cooperative Agreement guidance, including the Pandemic Flu Preparedness Supplement, provides for discounted bulk purchases of anti-viral pharmaceuticals and ventilators. MMRS jurisdictions should access that source before using MMRS grant funds to acquire and stockpile equipment and supplies for pandemic response. 4. Medical Reserve Corps. The Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) program is administered by the HHS Office of the Surgeon General. Medical Reserve Corps units are organized locally to meet the health and safety needs of their community. MRC members are identified, credentialed, trained and prepared in advance of an emergency, and may be utilized throughout the year to improve the public health system. MMRS jurisdictions are encouraged to actively collaborate with MRC unit representatives. MMRS funds may be used to support local MRC units if endorsed by the local MMRS Steering Committee. Local MRC units must submit proposals to the MMRS Steering Committee outlining the amount of funds requested, the purpose of the funds, and the specific goals that will be addressed by the MRC unit as outlined in the proposal. The MMRS Steering Committee shall ensure that the proposed MRC activities will support and complement the objectives of the MMRS program prior to approval of the MRC funds request. The following are examples of the types of allowable expenses that MMRS jurisdictions may consider when supporting/establishing MRC units: • Implementing mechanisms to assure appropriate integration and coordination with existing local emergency response and health assets and capabilities (including provision of legal protections for volunteers) • Developing plans to organize and mobilize the MRC unit in response not only to urgent needs, but also to address other public health needs in the community • Recruiting volunteers for the MRC unit • Tracking volunteer information • Screening and verifying credentials • Training • Providing equipment and supplies for the MRC unit 5. EMS medical oversight. To the extent that MMRS program funds are used to support the activities of EMS agencies and activities, those funds may only be used to 38 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM support EMS in systems which are operating under local or regional medical oversight consistent with state and local requirements and with the concurrence and approval of that local or regional medical oversight entity. C. Authorized Program Expenditures. This section provides guidance on the types of expenditures that are allowable under MMRS. Please refer to the checklist in Appendix B for a summary of authorized MMRS expenditures. 1. Planning Activities. The local MMRS Steering Committee represents the relevant organizations that assist in the planning and operational area (regional) development of the MMRS. Steering committees should ensure that MMRS strategic goals, objectives, operational capabilities, and resource requirements align with State and Urban Area Homeland Security Strategies. Steering committees should also ensure that operational plans and training and exercise activities are updated and/or modified to achieve conformance with the National Preparedness Guidelines and the NRF, to include coordinating structures, processes, and protocols. Steering committees are expected to provide a validation of the local MMRS work plan at least annually. 2. Organizational Activities. Organization costs are not allowed under MMRS. 3. Equipment Activities. MMRS funds may be used for equipment acquisition from the MMRS equipment categories listed in the AEL. The AEL is available at http://www.rkb.us and the equipment categories are outlined in Appendix B. MMRS jurisdictions are expected to manage their pharmaceutical cache in coordination with the local/regional public health offices and hospital associations. MMRS jurisdictions are advised to coordinate with their local/regional CDC counterparts before using MMRS grant funds to acquire and stockpile any equipment, supplies or pharmaceuticals for pandemic preparedness and response purposes. 4. Training Activities. Development and delivery of local and regional MMRS training programs and schedules should be based on the MMRS community’s risk management strategy. Allowable activities include: 39 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM • Training to strengthen medical surge, mass prophylaxis, triage and pre-hospital treatment, medical supplies management and distribution, mass care, and fatality management capabilities • Training to support pandemic influenza preparedness • Training in support of mass casualty response teams 5. Exercise Activities. The scenarios used in MMRS exercises must focus on catastrophic incidents with national impact (i.e., catastrophic natural hazard, terrorist incident). Grantees are encouraged to use the National Planning Scenarios as a basis for developing exercise scenarios for their region, with a focus on medical issues related to preparedness and response. Scenarios should be targeted to the MMRS Capability Focus Areas provided above. Grantees should include law enforcement personnel in exercises and planning activities. Citizen participation in exercises is strongly encouraged and should be coordinated with the local Medical Reserve Corps and Citizen Corps Council. Volunteer roles and responsibilities include, but are not limited to, backfilling non-professional tasks for first responders deployed on exercise planning and implementation, providing simulated victims, media, and members of the public; supporting surge capacity functions; and participating in the after-action review. 5.1 -- CDC Public Health Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreement Exercise requirement. MMRS jurisdictions, in coordination with regional, Urban Area and State exercise and public health officials, are expected to schedule, design, conduct, and evaluate mass casualty exercises that are in compliance with both FEMA and CDC exercise requirements and guidance. 6. Personnel Activities. Hiring, overtime, and backfill expenses are allowable only to perform programmatic activities deemed allowable under existing guidance. Supplanting, however, is not allowed. There is no percentage cap for MMRS. 7. Construction and Renovation Activities. Construction and renovation are not allowed under MMRS. 40 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM PART IX. PROGRAM OVERVIEW: CITIZEN CORPS PROGRAM The Citizen Corps mission is to bring community and government leaders together to coordinate the involvement of community members in emergency preparedness, planning, mitigation, response, and recovery. The FY 2008 Citizen Corps Program (CCP) funds provide resources for States and local communities to: 1) bring together the appropriate leadership to form and sustain a Citizen Corps Council; 2) develop and implement a plan or amend existing plans to achieve and expand citizen preparedness and participation; 3) conduct public education and outreach; 4) ensure clear alerts/warnings and emergency communications with the public; 5) develop training programs for the public, for both all-hazards preparedness and volunteer responsibilities; 6) facilitate citizen participation in exercises; 7) implement volunteer programs and activities to support emergency responders; 8) involve citizens in surge capacity roles and responsibilities during an incident in alignment with the Emergency Support Functions and Annexes; and 9) conduct evaluations of programs and activities. A. Program Requirements. All grant recipients must register their Citizen Corps Council on the Citizen Corps website (http://www.citizencorps/gov) and manage their program and contact information listed on the site. 1. State responsibilities. Citizen preparedness and participation must be coordinated by an integrated body of government and non-governmental representatives. States and local government recipients and sub-grantees of HSGP funds, including Urban Areas, must have such a body to serve as their Citizen Corps Council with membership that includes, but is not limited to: representatives from emergency management, homeland security, law enforcement, fire service, medical services/public health, elected officials, the private sector (especially privately owned critical infrastructure), private non-profits, non-governmental organizations (including faith-based and community-based organizations), and advocacy groups for special needs populations. Representatives from existing Citizen Corps programs, to include Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS), Medical Reserve Corps (MRC), Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), Neighborhood Watch/USAonWatch, Fire Corps, and Affiliates should also be included on these Citizen Corps Councils. Furthermore, Citizen Corps Councils should include a representative from the Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) where one exists. Senior Advisory Committees (SACs) and Urban Area Working Groups (UAWGs) may serve as Citizen Corps Councils if the appropriate representatives are members, to include the State/UASI Citizen Corps Program Manager(s) and non-governmental members. SAAs must coordinate all citizen involvement in emergency preparedness, 41 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM planning, mitigation, response, and recovery funded with any source of HSGP funds with the State agency currently responsible for the administration of Citizen Corps. A listing of current State Citizen Corps Program Managers is available by visiting http://www.citizencorps.gov/councils/ and selecting “State Citizen Corps Program Managers.” State Citizen Corps Program Managers must also continue to provide program management via the administrative section of the Citizen Corps website, http://www.citizencorps.gov, to include managing the approval process for local Citizen Corps Councils, CERT programs, managing administrative section passwords for local users, and managing calendar events, subscribers, and e-mails to local Councils. The community preparedness section(s) of State homeland security strategies, policies, guidance, plans (including EOPs, the State Preparedness Report, and Investment Justifications), and evaluations must be reviewed by the body serving as the State Citizen Corps Council and must include considerations for government/nongovernmental collaboration, and community preparedness and participation, including citizen involvement in preparedness and response. Non-governmental representatives are expected to evaluate most closely the functional areas of warnings, emergency public information, evacuation, mass care, resource management from nongovernmental sources, unaffiliated volunteer and donations management, and nongovernmental resource integration (goods and personnel) to support each Emergency Support Function in the EOP. 2. Reporting requirements. The SAA must coordinate the financial, programmatic, and administrative issues relating to the Citizen Corps mission with the State Citizen Corps Program Manager. Furthermore, the SAA must share the community preparedness information submitted in the state’s BSIR with the State Citizen Corps Program Manager. The State Citizen Corps Program Manager must also participate in the FEMA required monitoring process. B. Authorized Program Expenditures. This section provides guidance on the types of expenditures that are allowable under the CCP. Please refer to Appendix B for a summary of authorized CCP expenditures. 1. Planning Activities. Integrating non-governmental entities into the planning process is critical to achieve comprehensive community preparedness. To meet this important objective, HSGP funds may be used to support the following: • Establishing and sustaining bodies to serve as Citizen Corps Councils • Assuring that State and local government homeland security strategies, policies, guidance, plans, and evaluations include a greater emphasis on 42 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM government/non-governmental collaboration, citizen preparedness, and volunteer participation • Developing and implementing a community preparedness strategy for the State/local jurisdiction The community preparedness section(s) of State homeland security strategies, policies, guidance, plans (including EOPs, the State Preparedness Report, and Investment Justifications), and evaluations must be reviewed by the body serving as the State Citizen Corps Council and must include considerations for citizen preparedness and volunteer participation. 1.1 -- Public education/outreach. Citizen Corps Councils may develop or reproduce public education and outreach materials to: increase citizen preparedness (to include the DHS Ready Campaign materials); promote training, exercise, and volunteer opportunities; and inform the public about emergency plans, evacuation routes, shelter locations, and systems for public alerts/warnings. Public education and outreach materials should incorporate special needs considerations, to include language, content, and method of communication. Allowable expenditures include: • Media campaigns: PSAs, camera-ready materials, website support, newsletters • Outreach activities and public events: booth displays; event backdrops or signs; displays and demonstrations; and informational materials such as brochures/flyers • Promotional materials: pins, patches, magnets, clothing/headwear. Expenditures for promotional items must not exceed 15 percent of the total Citizen Corps Program allocation. All materials must include the national or jurisdiction’s Citizen Corps logo, tagline and website or the Ready logo, tagline, and website and comply with logo standards. For more information go to https://www.citizencorps.gov/pdf/logo_guide.pdf 1.2 -- Citizen participation - Volunteer programs and disaster response support. Citizen support for emergency responders is critical through year-round volunteer programs and as surge capacity in disaster response. Citizen Corps funding may be used to establish, enhance or expand volunteer programs and volunteer recruitment efforts for Neighborhood Watch/USAonWatch, Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT), Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS), Medical Reserve Corps (MRC), and Fire Corps; for the Citizen Corps Affiliate Programs and Organizations; and for jurisdiction specific volunteer efforts. Examples include: • Recruiting, screening, and training volunteers (e.g., background checks) • Retaining, recognizing, and motivating volunteers • Purchasing, maintaining, or subscribing to a system to track volunteers (in compliance with applicable privacy laws), to include identification and credentialing systems, and to track volunteer hours 43 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM • Evaluating volunteers 2. Organizational Activities. Organization activities supported with CCP funding are limited to 25 percent of the grantee's CCP funding. 3. Equipment Activities. States and Urban Areas are encouraged to fully leverage all HSGP resources for equipment to support volunteer personnel in preparedness and response. All allowable equipment costs are listed in the AEL, available at http://www.rkb.us. Any equipment purchased with CCP funding must be used for specific preparedness or volunteer training or by volunteers in carrying out their response functions. CCP funding is not intended for equipment to be used by uniformed emergency responders, except to support training for citizens. Examples of equipment used to support training for citizens includes such items as burn pans or sample volunteer response kits. Expenditures for kits used in volunteer response (e.g. CERT or MRC kits / backpacks) or clothing for official identification must not exceed 30 percent of the total Citizen Corps Program allocation. Clothing for official identification are those items that volunteers are required to wear when engaging in public safety activities (e.g., t-shirts for CERT members, baseball caps for Neighborhood Watch/USAonWatch Program foot patrol members). 4. Training Activities. Training funded with these grants can include all-hazards safety, such as emergency preparedness, basic first aid, life saving skills, crime prevention and terrorism awareness, school preparedness, public health issues, mitigation/property damage prevention, safety in the home, light search and rescue skills, principles of NIMS/ICS, community relations, volunteer management, serving people with disabilities, pet care preparedness, any training necessary to participate in volunteer activities, any training necessary to fulfill surge capacity roles, or other training that promotes individual, family, or community safety and preparedness. Funding for CERT training includes the delivery of the CERT basic training to volunteers, supplemental training for CERT members who have completed the basic training, and the CERT Train-the-Trainer training. The training must include the topics, be instructor-led and classroom-based, using lecture, demonstration, and hands-on practice throughout. Note that the Independent Study course, “Introduction to CERT” (IS 317) must not be substituted for delivery of basic training consistent with the 20-hour CERT curriculum. There is no cap on the number of deliveries State or local jurisdictions may conduct of the CERT basic training, the CERT Train-the-Trainer, Campus CERT Train-the-Trainer, or Teen CERT Train-the-Trainer courses. 44 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Training should be delivered with specific consideration to include all ages, ethnic and cultural groups, persons with disabilities, and special needs populations at venues throughout the community, to include schools, neighborhoods, places of worship, the private sector, non-governmental organizations, and government locations. Jurisdictions are also encouraged to incorporate non-traditional methodologies such as the Internet, distance learning, home study, and to leverage existing training provided via educational/professional facilities. Pilot courses and innovative approaches to training citizens and instructors are encouraged. Instruction for trainers and training to support the Citizen Corps Council members in their efforts to manage and coordinate the Citizen Corps mission is also an allowable use of the FY 2008 Citizen Corps Program funding. 5. Exercise Activities. Exercises specifically designed for or that include participation from non-governmental entities and the general public are allowable activities and may include testing public warning systems, evacuation/shelter in-place capabilities, family/school/business preparedness, and participating in table-top or full scale emergency responder exercises at the local, State, or national level, to include the Top Officials Exercise (TOPOFF). 6. Personnel Activities. Hiring, overtime, and backfill expenses are allowable only to perform programmatic activities allowable under existing guidance. Supplanting, however, is not allowed. There is no percentage cap for CCP. 7. Construction and Renovation Activities. Construction and renovation is not allowed under CCP. 45 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM APPENDIX A. METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS) QUERIED FOR UASI RISK METHODOLOGY DETERMINATIONS Pursuant to changes required by the 9/11 Act, eligible FY 2008 UASI candidates were determined based on an analysis of relative risk of the 100 most populous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. MSAs are used by DHS to determine eligibility for participation in the program. Page Nine shows a table of Urban Areas selected for possible FY 2008 funding. The following table lists the MSAs queried as part of the overall risk methodology. Urban Area Working Groups (UAWGs) must continue to take a regional approach to membership but are not required to expand or contract existing Urban Area participation to conform to MSA composition as a result of this legislative change. Detailed information on MSAs is publicly available from the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html. Geographical areas queried do not equate to minimum mandated membership representation of an Urban Area, nor does this guarantee funding for geographical areas queried. MSA jurisdictions queried in the risk methodology, who are not current members of the UASI’s Urban Area Working Group (UAWG), are strongly encouraged to coordinate and participate with the UAWG. Likewise, UAWG’s are strongly encouraged to regularly coordinate and include those MSAs for participation and funding who have not historically been members of the UASI. A-1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Metropolitan Statistical Areas Queried for UASI Determinations FY 2008 Tier I Urban Areas 7 Urban Areas FY 2008 Tier I Urban Areas 7 Urban Areas A-2 FY 2008 Tier II Urban Areas 53 Urban Areas * Alphabetical placement does not equate to funding allocation. (CA) Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale Area, CA (CA) San Francisco-San Jose-Bay Area, CA (DC) Washington-Arlington-Alexandria Area, DC-VA-MD-WV (IL) Chicago-Naperville-Joliet Area, IL-IN-WI (AZ) Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Area, AZ (AZ) Tucson Area, AZ (CA) Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Area, CA (CA) Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville Area, CA (CA) San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos Area, CA (CA) Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine Area, CA (CO) Denver-Aurora Area, CO (CT) Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk Area, CT (CT) Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford Area, CT (FL) Fort Lauderdale-Broward-Palm Beach Area, FL (FL) Jacksonville Area, FL (FL) Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall Area, FL (FL) Orlando-Kissimmee Area, FL (FL) Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater Area, FL (GA) Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta Area, GA (HI) Honolulu Area, HI (IN) Indianapolis-Carmel Area, IN (KY) Louisville-Jefferson County Area, KY-IN (LA) Baton Rouge Area, LA (LA) New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner Area, LA (MA) Boston-Cambridge-Quincy Area, MA-NH (MD) Baltimore-Towson Area, MD (MI) Detroit-Warren-Livonia Area, MI (MN) Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington Area, MN-WI (MO) Kansas City Area, MO-KS (MO) St. Louis Area, MO-IL (NC) Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord Area, NC-SC (NJ) Newark-Edison Area, NJ-PA (NY) New York-Long Island Area, NY-NJ (TX) Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown Area, TX (NV) Las Vegas-Paradise Area, NV (NY) Albany-Schenectady-Troy Area, NY (NY) Buffalo-Niagara Falls Area, NY (NY) Rochester Area, NY (NY) Syracuse Area, NY (OH) Cincinnati-Middletown Area, OH-KY-IN (OH) Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor Area, OH (OH) Columbus Area, OH (OH) Toledo Area, OH (OK) Oklahoma City Area, OK (OR) Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton Area, OR-WA (PA) Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington Area, PA-NJ-DE-MD (PA) Pittsburgh Area, PA (PR) San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo Area, PR (RI) Providence-New Bedford-Fall River Area, RI-MA (TN) Memphis Area, TN-MS-AR (TN) Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro Area, TN (TX) Austin-Round Rock Area, TX (TX) Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Area, TX (TX) El Paso Area, TX (TX) San Antonio Area, TX (UT) Salt Lake City Area, UT (VA) Richmond Area, VA (VA) Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News Area, VA-NC (WA) Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue Area, WA (WI) Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis Area, WI U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM APPENDIX B. AUTHORIZED ALLOWABLE COSTS FY 2008 Allowable Cost Matrix Allowable Program Activities Current as of FY 2008 Programs* FEMA See the respective program guidance for additional details and/or requirements HSGP *As of Publication SHSPUASIMMRSCCP Allowable Planning Costs Public education & outreach Y Y Y Y Develop and implement homeland security support programs and adopt ongoing DHS National Initiatives, including State Preparedness Reports Y Y Y Y Develop and enhance plans and protocols Y Y Y Y Develop or conduct assessments Y Y Y Y Establish, enhance, or evaluate Citizen Corps related volunteer programs Y Y Y Y Hiring of full- or part-time staff or contract/consultants to assist with planning activities (not for the purpose of hiring public safety personnel fulfilling traditional public safety duties) Y Y Y Y Conferences to facilitate planning activities Y Y Y Y Materials required to conduct planning activities Y Y Y Y Travel/per diem related to planning activities Y Y Y Y Overtime and backfill costs (IAW operational Cost Guidance) Y Y Y Y Other project areas with prior approval from FEMA Y Y Y Y Allowable Organizational Activities Overtime for information, investigative, and intelligence sharing activities (up to 25 percent of the allocation) Y Y Reimbursement for select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites incurred during periods of DHS- declared alert (up to 25 percent of the allocation) Y Y Hiring of full- or part-time staff or contractors for emergency management activities Y Hiring of new staff positions/contractors/consultants for participation in information/intelligence analysis and sharing groups or fusion center activities (up to 25 percent of the allocation) Y Y Allowable Equipment Categories Personal Protective Equipment Y Y Y Y Explosive Device Mitigation and Remediation Equipment Y Y CBRNE Operational Search and Rescue Equipment Y Y Y Y Information Technology Y Y Y Y Cyber Security Enhancement Equipment Y Y Y Y Interoperable Communications Equipment Y Y Y Y Detection Y Y Y B-1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Allowable Program Activities Current as of FY 2008 Programs* FEMA See the respective program guidance for additional details and/or requirements HSGP *As of Publication SHSPUASIMMRSCCP Decontamination Y Y Y Medical Y Y Y Y Power Y Y Y Y CBRNE Reference Materials Y Y Y CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles Y Y Y Y Terrorism Incident Prevention Equipment Y Y Physical Security Enhancement Equipment Y Y Inspection and Screening Systems Y Y Y Agriculture Terrorism Prevention, Response, and Mitigation Equipment Y Y Y CBRNE Prevention and Response Watercraft Y Y CBRNE Aviation Equipment Y Y Y CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment Y Y Y Y Intervention Equipment Y Y Other Authorized Equipment Y Y Y Y Allowable Training Costs Overtime and backfill for emergency preparedness and response personnel attending FEMA-sponsored and approved training classes Y Y Y Y Overtime and backfill expenses for part-time and volunteer emergency response personnel participating in FEMA training Y Y Y Y Training workshops and conferences Y Y Y Y Full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants Y Y Y Y Travel Y Y Y Y Supplies Y Y Y Y Tuition for higher education Y Y Y Y Other items Y Y Y Y Allowable Exercise Related Costs Design, Develop, Conduct and Evaluate an Exercise Y Y Y Y Exercise planning workshop Y Y Y Y Full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants Y Y Y Y Overtime and backfill costs, including expenses for part-time and volunteer emergency response personnel participating in FEMA exercises Y Y Y Y Implementation of HSEEP Y Y Y Y Travel Y Y Y Y Supplies Y Y Y Y Other items Y Y Y Y Allowable Management & Administrative Costs Hiring of full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants to assist with the management of the respective grant program, application requirements, compliance with reporting and data collection requirements Y Y Y Y B-2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM Allowable Program Activities Current as of FY 2008 Programs* FEMA See the respective program guidance for additional detai