U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 
FY 2012 Preparedness Grant Programs Overview 

Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) 
Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG) Program 
Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP) 
Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) 
Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak) Program 
Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) 
Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) 


February 2012 


Grant Programs Directorate 


Homeland Security Preparedness Grant Programs Overview 
On March 30, 2011, the President released Presidential Policy Directive - 8 (PPD-8), 
which focuses on strengthening the security and resilience of the United States through 
systematic preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the 
nation, including acts of terrorism, cyber attacks, pandemics, and catastrophic natural 
disasters. As defined in PPD-8, national preparedness refers to “the actions taken to 
plan, organize, equip, train and exercise to build and sustain the capabilities necessary 
to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to, and recover from those 
threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation.” National preparedness 
is the shared responsibility of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, 
and individual citizens. The objective of PPD-8 is to facilitate an integrated, all-of-
Nation, capabilities-based approach to preparedness. 

One of the core missions of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is to enhance 
the ability of state, territory, local, and tribal governments to prevent, protect against, 
respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks and other disasters. DHS’ comprehensive 
suite of homeland security preparedness grant programs are an important part of the 
Administration’s larger, coordinated effort to strengthen homeland security 
preparedness. These programs implement objectives addressed in a series of post-
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-53) 
(“hereafter “9/11 Act”) laws, strategy documents, plans, and presidential policy 
directives to include PPD-8. 

The following is a summary of the DHS grant programs which are being announced on 
February 17, 2012. The following pages outline greater details and background 
information with respect to these programs. 

Funding Distribution – FY 2011 and FY 2012 

Program FY 2011 FY 2012 
Homeland Security Grant Program $1,289,296,132 $830,976,000 
State Homeland Security Program $526,874,100 $294,000,000 
Urban Areas Security Initiative $662,622,100 $490,376,000 
Operation Stonegarden $54,890,000 $46,600,000 
Emergency Management Performance Grants Program $329,140,400 $339,500,000 
Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program $10,000,000 $6,000,000 
Nonprofit Security Grant Program $18,962,000 $10,000,000 
Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak) Program $19,960,000 $10,000,000 
Port Security Grant Program $235,029,000 $97,500,000 
Transit Security Grant Program $200,079,000 $87,500,000 
Total $2,190,570,008 $1,381,476,000 

2 



Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) 
The FY 2012 HSGP plays an important role in the implementation of PPD-8 by 
supporting the development and sustainment of core capabilities to fulfill the National 
Preparedness Goal (NPG). The following are descriptions of each HSGP component 
programs. HSGP is comprised of three interconnected grant programs: 

. 
State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) 

. 
Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) 

. 
Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) 

Together, these grant programs fund a range of preparedness activities, including 
planning, organization, equipment purchase, training, exercises, and management and 
administration. 

State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) 

Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $294,000,000 

Purpose: SHSP supports the implementation of state Homeland Security Strategies to 
address the identified planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs to 
prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism and 
other catastrophic events. SHSP also provides funding to implement initiatives in the 
State Preparedness Report. 

Eligible Applicants: The State Administrative Agency (SAA) is the only entity eligible to 
apply to FEMA for SHSP funds. Recipients include all 50 states, the District of 
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the 

U.S. Virgin Islands. 
Program Awards: The allocation methodology for FY 2012 SHSP is based on three 
factors: minimum amounts as legislatively mandated, DHS’ risk methodology, and 
anticipated effectiveness based on the strength of the Investment Justification (IJ). 
Each State and territory will receive a minimum allocation under SHSP using the 
thresholds established in the 9/11 Act. All 50 States, the District of Columbia, and 
Puerto Rico will receive 0.35 percent of the total funds allocated for grants under 
Section 2003 and Section 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended by 
the 9/11 Act, for SHSP. Four territories (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) will receive a minimum allocation of 0.08 percent of 
the total funds allocated for grants under Section 2003 and 2004 of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002, as amended by the 9/11 Act, for SHSP. 

3 



Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Program 

Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $490,376,000 

Purpose: UASI program funds address the unique planning, organization, equipment, 
training, and exercise needs of high-threat, high-density urban areas, and assists them 
in building an enhanced and sustainable capacity to prevent, protect against, mitigate, 
respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism. 

Eligible Applicants: The SAA is the only entity eligible to apply to FEMA for UASI 
funds. A total of 31 high-threat, high-density urban areas are eligible for funding under 
the FY 2012 UASI program. 

Program Awards: The allocation methodology for FY 2012 UASI is based on DHS’ risk 
methodology and anticipated effectiveness based on the strength of the IJ. Eligible 
candidates for the FY 2012 UASI program have been determined through an analysis of 
relative risk of terrorism faced by the 100 most populous metropolitan statistical areas in 
the United States, in accordance with the 9/11 Act. 

Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) 

Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $46,600,000 

Purpose: OPSG funds are intended to enhance cooperation and coordination among 
local, tribal, territorial, state, and federal law enforcement agencies in a joint mission to 
secure the United States’ borders along routes of ingress from international borders to 
include travel corridors in States bordering Mexico and Canada, as well as states and 
territories with international water borders. 

Eligible Applicants: The SAA is the only entity eligible to apply to FEMA for OPSG 
funds. Local units of government at the county level and federally-recognized tribal 
governments in the states bordering Canada (including Alaska), southern states 
bordering Mexico, and states and territories with International water borders may apply 
for FY 2012 OPSG funds through their SAA. 

Program Awards: FY 2012 OPSG allocations will be made competitively to designated 
localities within U.S. border states based on risk analysis and the anticipated feasibility 
and effectiveness of proposed investments by the applicants. 

Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG) Program 
Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $339,500,000 

Purpose: The purpose of the FY 2012 EMPG Program is to provide grants to states to 
assist state, local, tribal and territorial governments in preparing for all hazards, as 
authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 

U.S.C. 5121 et seq.). Title VI of the Stafford Act authorizes FEMA to make grants for 
the purpose of providing a system of emergency preparedness for the protection of life 
and property in the United States from hazards and to vest responsibility for emergency 
4 



preparedness jointly in the federal government and the states and their political 
subdivisions. The federal government, through the EMPG Program, provides 
necessary direction, coordination, and guidance, and provides necessary assistance, as 
authorized in this title so that a comprehensive emergency preparedness system exists 
for all hazards. The FY 2012 EMPG plays an important role in the implementation of 
PPD-8 by supporting the development and sustainment of core capabilities to fulfill the 
NPG. 

Eligible Applicants: The SAA or the state’s Emergency Management Agency (EMA) is 
the only entity eligible to apply to FEMA for the EMPG Program funds on behalf of state 
and local emergency management agencies, however only one application will be 
accepted from each state or territory. All 56 states and territories, as well as the 
Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia, are eligible to 
apply for the FY 2012 EMPG Program funds. 

Program Awards: The FY 2012 EMPG Program allocation methodology dictates that 
all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico will 
receive a base amount of 0.75 percent (.75%) of the total available grant funding. Four 
territories (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin 
Islands) will receive a base amount of 0.25 percent (.25%) of the total available grant 
funding. The balance of the EMPG Program funds will be distributed on a population-
match basis. Pursuant to Article X of the Federal Programs and Services Agreement of 
the Compact of Free Association authorized by Public Law 108-188, funds are available 
for the Federated States of Micronesia, and for the Republic of the Marshall Islands. 

In FY 2012, the Federal share of the cost of an activity carried out using funds made 
available under the program shall not exceed 50 percent of the total budget. State cost 
match (cash or in-kind) requirement, as authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Public Law 93-288), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 
5121-5207, specifically, Title VI, sections 611(j) and 613. Unless otherwise authorized 
by law, Federal funds cannot be matched with other Federal funds. 

Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP) 
Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $6,000,000 

Purpose: THSGP provides funding directly to eligible tribes to help strengthen the 
nation against risks associated with potential terrorist attacks. The FY 2012 THSGP 
plays an important role in the implementation of PPD-8 by supporting the development 
and sustainment of core capabilities to fulfill the NPG. 

Eligible Applicants: Per the 9/11 Act, a “directly eligible tribe” is defined as — 

(A) any Indian tribe— 
(i) that is located in the continental United States; 
(ii) that operates a law enforcement or emergency response agency with the 
capacity to respond to calls for law enforcement or emergency services; 
(iii) 
5 



(I) 
that is located on or near an international border or a coastline 
bordering an ocean (including the Gulf of Mexico) or international 
waters; 
(II) that is located within 10 miles of a system or asset included on the 
prioritized critical infrastructure list established under section 
210E(a)(2) or has such a system or asset within its territory; 
(III) that is located within or contiguous to 1 of the 50 most populous 
metropolitan statistical areas in the United States; or 
(IV) the jurisdiction of which includes not less than 1,000 square miles of 
Indian country, as that term is defined in section 1151 of title 18, United 
States Code; and 
(iv) that certifies to the Secretary that a state has not provided funds under 
section 2003 or 2004 to the Indian tribe or consortium of Indian tribes for the 
purpose for which direct funding is sought; and 
(B) a consortium of Indian tribes, if each tribe satisfies the requirements of 
subparagraph (A). 
In summary, eligible tribes must meet the requirements set forth in (A) (i), and (A) (ii), 
and (A) (iv). Tribes must also meet one of the requirements set forth in (A) (iii); either 

(A) (iii) (I), or (A) (iii) (II), or (A) (iii) (III), or (A) (iii) (IV). Finally, (B) may also be satisfied, 
if each tribe satisfies the requirements of subparagraph (A). 
Program Awards: FY 2012 THSGP funds will be allocated based on two factors: tribal 
eligibility per the 9/11 Act (self-certified) and the effectiveness of the applicant’s THSGP 
Investment Justification (as determined through a peer review process). 

Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) 
Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $10,000,000 

Purpose: NSGP provides funding support for target hardening and other physical 
security enhancements and activities to nonprofit organizations that are at high risk of a 
terrorist attack and located within one of the specific FY 2012 UASI-eligible urban areas. 
The FY 2012 NSGP plays an important role in the implementation of PPD-8 by 
supporting the development and sustainment of core capabilities to fulfill the NPG. 

Eligible Applicants: The SAA is the only entity eligible to apply to FEMA for NSGP 
funds on behalf of eligible nonprofit organizations (as described under section 501(c)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). Eligible nonprofit organizations determined to 
be at high risk of a terrorist attack and located within one of the specific FY 2012 UASI-
eligible urban areas must apply for funding through their SAA. 

Program Awards: FY 2012 NSGP funds will be allocated based on risk analysis, 
effectiveness, and integration with broader state and local preparedness efforts. Each 
nonprofit organization may apply through their SAA for up to a $75,000 grant award. 

6 



Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak) Program 
Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $10,000,000 

Purpose: The Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) - Amtrak Program provides funding to 
Amtrak to develop security enhancements for eligible intercity passenger rail operations. 
The FY 2012 IPR plays an important role in the implementation of PPD-8 by supporting 
the development and sustainment of core capabilities to fulfill the NPG. 

Eligible Applicants: The eligible applicant under the FY 2012 IPR Program is the 
National Passenger Railroad Corporation (Amtrak). Amtrak is the only entity eligible to 
apply for funding under the FY 2012 IPR Program. 

Program Awards: DHS will partner with Amtrak to develop security enhancements for 
eligible intercity passenger rail operations in all eligible UASI areas Amtrak passes 
through or services. 

Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) 
Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $97,500,000 

Purpose: PSPG provides funding for transportation infrastructure security activities to 
implement Area Maritime Transportation Security Plans and facility security plans 
among port authorities, facility operators, and state and local government agencies 
required to provide port security services. The purpose of the FY 2012 PSGP is to 
support increased port-wide risk management; enhanced domain awareness; training 
and exercises; expansion of port recovery and resiliency capabilities; and further 
capabilities to prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from attacks involving 
improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and other non-conventional weapons; and 
competitively award grant funding to assist ports in obtaining the resources required to 
support the NPG’s associated mission areas and core capabilities. 

Eligible Applicants: Seven port areas have been selected as Group I (highest risk), 48 
port areas have been selected as Group II, and 35 port areas have been selected as 
Group III. Ports not identified in Group I, II, or III will compete for the funding identified 
for the “All Other Port Areas” Group. Ports that qualified under the “All Other Port 
Areas” category that are located within Group I, II, or III areas are allowed to receive 
grant funds from their geographically proximate higher group if the project has regional 
impact across the entire port area, but not from both funding groups for the same 
project. 

Program Awards: DHS has apportioned a percentage of the total amount available to 
each of the port area groups. Port areas will compete for funding within their specific 
group. 

7 



Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) 
Total Funding Available in FY 2012: $87,500,000 

Purpose: TSGP provides funds to owners and operators of transit systems (which 
include intracity bus, commuter bus, ferries, and all forms of passenger rail) to protect 
critical surface transportation infrastructure and the traveling public from acts of 
terrorism and to increase the resilience of transit infrastructure. The FY 2012 TSGP 
plays an important role in the implementation of PPD-8 by supporting the development 
and sustainment of core capabilities to fulfill the NPG. 

Eligible Applicants: Eligible transit agencies are determined based on daily unlinked 
passenger trips (ridership) and transit systems that serve historically eligible Urban 
Areas Security Initiative (UASI) jurisdictions. Certain ferry systems are eligible to 
participate in the FY 2012 TSGP and receive funds. However, any ferry system 
electing to participate and receive funds under the FY 2012 TSGP will not be eligible to 
participate under the FY 2012 Port Security Grant Program (PSGP), and will not be 
considered for funding under the FY 2012 PSGP. Likewise, any ferry system that 
participates in the PSGP will not be eligible for funding under the TSGP. 

Program Awards: DHS intends to focus its available transit security grant dollars on 
the highest-risk systems through a competitive process. 

DHS has identified critical infrastructure assets of national concern through the Top 
Transit Asset List (TTAL). Critical infrastructure assets are those vital to the 
functionality and continuity of a major transit system such that that their incapacitation or 
destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, 
public health or safety, or any combination thereof. With the creation of the TTAL, DHS 
can now target funding to the remediation of those assets on the list in an informed and 
risk-based approach. 

8 



FY 2012 Funding Tables 
Table 1. FY 2012 SHSP Allocations 

State/Territory FY 2012 Allocation State/Territory FY 2012 Allocation 
Alabama $2,801,316 Montana $2,801,316 
Alaska $2,801,316 Nebraska $2,801,316 
American Samoa $640,301 Nevada $2,801,316 
Arizona $3,310,348 New Hampshire $2,801,316 
Arkansas $2,801,316 New Jersey $6,230,200 
California $43,503,883 New Mexico $2,801,316 
Colorado $2,801,316 New York $55,610,384 
Connecticut $2,801,316 North Carolina $3,977,858 
Delaware $2,801,316 North Dakota $2,801,316 
District of Columbia $2,984,245 Northern Mariana Islands $640,301 
Florida $8,839,003 Ohio $5,578,064 
Georgia $4,932,320 Oklahoma $2,801,316 
Guam $640,301 Oregon $2,801,316 
Hawaii $2,801,316 Pennsylvania $7,265,475 
Idaho $2,801,316 Puerto Rico $2,801,316 
Illinois $11,852,469 Rhode Island $2,801,316 
Indiana $2,801,316 South Carolina $2,801,316 
Iowa $2,801,316 South Dakota $2,801,316 
Kansas $2,801,316 Tennessee $2,801,316 
Kentucky $2,801,316 Texas $15,820,512 
Louisiana $2,801,316 U.S. Virgin Islands $640,301 
Maine $2,801,316 Utah $2,801,316 
Maryland $4,438,106 Vermont $2,801,316 
Massachusetts $4,073,885 Virginia $5,372,259 
Michigan $4,898,578 Washington $4,705,147 
Minnesota $2,801,316 West Virginia $2,801,316 
Mississippi $2,801,316 Wisconsin $2,801,316 
Missouri $2,801,316 Wyoming $2,801,316 
Total $294,000,000 

9 



Table 2. FY 2012 UASI Allocations 

State/Territory Urban Area FY 2012 Allocation 
Arizona Phoenix Area $4,018,455 
California 
Anaheim/Santa Ana Area $4,455,106 
Bay Area $26,423,268 
Los Angeles/Long Beach Area $61,029,547 
Riverside Area $1,521,937 
San Diego Area $9,156,712 
Colorado Denver Area $2,527,525 
District of Columbia National Capital Region $51,839,027 
Florida 
Miami/Fort Lauderdale Area $5,401,304 
Orlando Area $1,447,416 
Tampa Area $2,595,211 
Georgia Atlanta Area $5,283,893 
Illinois Chicago Area $47,703,062 
Indiana Indianapolis Area $1,250,000 
Louisiana New Orleans Area $1,250,000 
Maryland Baltimore Area $4,116,111 
Massachusetts Boston Area $10,861,397 
Michigan Detroit Area $5,232,574 
Minnesota Twin Cities Area $3,270,673 
Missouri 
Kansas City Area $1,250,000 
St. Louis Area $2,908,188 
Nevada Las Vegas Area $1,826,923 
New Jersey Jersey City/Newark Area $21,663,035 
New York New York City Area $151,579,096 
North Carolina Charlotte Area $1,494,751 
Oregon Portland Area $2,157,259 
Pennsylvania Philadelphia Area $14,268,859 
Texas 
Dallas/Fort Worth/Arlington Area $14,292,691 
Houston Area $23,936,523 
San Antonio Area $1,250,000 
Washington Seattle Area $4,365,457 
Total $490,376,000 

10 



Table 3. FY 2012 EMPG Program Allocations 

State/Territory Allocation State/Territory Allocation 
Alabama $5,643,567 New Hampshire $3,396,361 
Alaska $3,012,335 New Jersey $8,235,067 
Arizona $6,726,857 New Mexico $3,889,089 
Arkansas $4,440,971 New York $15,099,475 
California $26,853,993 North Carolina $8,773,722 
Colorado $5,846,103 North Dakota $2,987,322 
Connecticut $4,855,471 Ohio $9,991,660 
Delaware $3,131,267 Oklahoma $4,991,417 
District of Columbia $2,944,799 Oregon $5,043,236 
Florida $14,836,576 Pennsylvania $10,764,216 
Georgia $8,876,139 Rhode Island $3,224,241 
Hawaii $3,432,873 South Carolina $5,563,914 
Idaho $3,568,417 South Dakota $3,077,706 
Illinois $10,845,713 Tennessee $6,675,812 
Indiana $6,749,053 Texas $19,104,010 
Iowa $4,521,152 Utah $4,363,094 
Kansas $4,397,929 Vermont $2,950,239 
Kentucky $5,364,075 Virginia $7,767,800 
Louisiana $5,496,590 Washington $6,950,984 
Maine $3,402,807 West Virginia $3,742,786 
Maryland $6,304,949 Wisconsin $6,229,804 
Massachusetts $6,794,592 Wyoming $2,912,659 
Michigan $8,915,464 Puerto Rico $4,936,717 
Minnesota $5,993,184 U.S. Virgin Islands $919,474 
Mississippi $4,467,111 American Samoa $892,115 
Missouri $6,422,580 Guam $966,952 
Montana $3,189,995 Northern Mariana Islands $878,448 
Nebraska $3,734,581 Republic of the Marshall Islands $50,000 
Nevada $4,302,537 Federated States of Micronesia $50,000 
Total $339,500,000 

11 



Table 4. FY 2012 PSGP Target Allocations 

Group State/Territory Port Area FY 2012 Target 
Allocation 
I 
California 
Los Angeles-Long Beach 
Long Beach 
Los Angeles 
$58,500,000 
San Francisco Bay 
Carquinez Strait 
Martinez 
Oakland 
Richmond 
San Francisco 
Stockton 
Louisiana 
New Orleans 
Baton Rouge 
Gramercy 
New Orleans 
Plaquemines, Port of 
South Louisiana, Port of 
St. Rose 
New Jersey / 
Pennsylvania / 
Delaware 
Delaware Bay 
Camden-Gloucester, NJ 
Chester, PA 
Marcus Hook, PA 
New Castle, DE 
Paulsboro, NJ 
Philadelphia, PA 
Trenton, NJ 
Wilmington, DE 
New York / New 
Jersey New York, NY and NJ 
Texas Houston-Galveston 
Galveston 
Washington Puget Sound 
Anacortes 
II 
Alabama Mobile 
$29,250,000 
Alaska Anchorage 
California 
El Segundo 
San Diego 
Port Hueneme 
Connecticut 
Long Island Sound 
Bridgeport 
New Haven 
New London 
Florida 
Jacksonville 
Port Everglades 
Miami 
Tampa Bay 
Port Manatee 
Tampa 
Port Canaveral 
West Palm Beach 

12 



Group State/Territory Port Area FY 2012 Target 
Allocation 
II 
(cont.) 
Georgia Savannah 
$29,250,000 
(cont.) 
Guam Apra Harbor 
Hawaii 
Honolulu 
Barbers Point, Oahu 
Honolulu, Oahu 
Indiana / 
Illinois 
Southern Tip Lake Michigan 
Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 
Chicago, IL 
Gary, IN 
Indiana Harbor, IN 
Kentucky Louisville 
Louisiana Lake Charles 
Morgan City 
Massachusetts Boston 
Massachusetts / 
Rhode Island 
Narragansett/Mt. Hope Bays 
Fall River, MA 
Newport, RI 
Providence, RI 
Maryland Baltimore 
Maine Portland 
Michigan Detroit 
Minnesota 
Minneapolis-St. Paul 
Minneapolis 
St. Paul 
Minnesota / 
Wisconsin Duluth-Superior, MN and WI 
Missouri Kansas City 
Missouri/ 
Illinois St. Louis, MO and IL 
Mississippi Pascagoula 
Vicksburg 
New Hampshire Portsmouth 
North Carolina Wilmington 
Morehead City 
New York Buffalo 
Ohio Cincinnati 
Toledo 
Pennsylvania Pittsburgh 
Puerto Rico San Juan 
South Carolina Charleston 
Tennessee Memphis 
Nashville 
Texas 
Sabine-Neches River 
Beaumont 
Orange 
Port Arthur 
Corpus Christi 
Freeport 
Virginia 
Hampton Roads 
Newport News 
Norfolk Harbor 

13 



Group State/Territory Port Area FY 2012 Target 
Allocation 
II 
(cont.) 
Washington / 
Oregon / 
Idaho 
Columbia-Snake River System 
$29,250,000 
(cont.) 
Kalama, WA 
Longview, WA 
Portland, OR 
Vancouver, WA 
Benton, WA 
Clarkston, WA 
Ilwaco, WA 
Kennewick, WA 
Pasco, WA 
Walla Walla, WA 
Whitman County, WA 
Astoria, OR 
Boardman, OR 
The Dalles, OR 
Hood River, OR 
St. Helens, OR 
Umatilla, OR 
Lewiston, ID 
West Virginia Huntington - TriState 
Wisconsin Green Bay 
III 
Alaska Valdez 
$4,875,000 
Alabama Guntersville 
Arkansas Helena 
California Sacramento 
Florida 
Fort Pierce 
Panama City 
Pensacola 
Georgia Brunswick 
Illinois Peoria 
Indiana Mount Vernon 
Louisiana Port Fourchon/The LOOP 
Michigan 
Port Huron 
Sault Ste Marie 
Marine City 
Muskegon 
Monroe 
Minnesota Two Harbors 
Mississippi Gulfport 
Greenville 
New York Albany 
Ohio Cleveland 
Lorain 
Oklahoma Tulsa, Port of Catoosa 
Oregon Coos Bay 
Pennsylvania Erie 
Puerto Rico 
Guayanilla 
Humacao 
Jobos 
Ponce 
Tennessee Chattanooga 

14 



Group State/Territory Port Area FY 2012 Target 
Allocation 
III 
(cont.) 
Texas 
Port Lavaca-Point Comfort 
$4,875,000 
(cont.) 
Victoria 
Brownsville 
Virginia Richmond 
Wisconsin Milwaukee 
All Other 
Port Areas 
Eligible entities not located within one of the port areas 
identified above, but operating under an AMSP, are eligible to 
compete for funding within “All Other Port Areas” Group 
$4,875,000 
Total: $97,500,000 

15