Overview of Compliance Options “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results” Albert Einstein Reasonable and Prudent Alternative Summary of Elements ? Notify Puget Sound communities of determination ? Change mapping procedures to reduce impacts ? Require communities to consider impacts on fish habitat when issuing floodplain development permits ? Changes to CRS program ? Addressing levee vegetation maintenance effects ? Mitigation to adversely affected habitat ? Report to NMFS on progress towards meeting requirements ? 44 CFR 60.3 (a) (2) A community shall: * Assure all necessary permits have been received from State and Federal agencies from which approval is required by Fed/State law. * Requires a showing of compliance, particularly with CWA 404 permits, but includes ESA Section 10 permits. ? Helmet to Helmet hits in the NFL * In the rule book since 1982 * No change to the rule * Step up enforcement of the rule * Changing the culture of football Compliance Options * Programmatic approach * Combines Floodplain requirements (Structural based) with Habitat requirements (species based) * Written ESA inclusive, not salmon specific * More than minimally necessary (avoid adverse effect vs. eliminate Jeopardy/Adverse Mod.) * Technical Assistance * Not required, but highly encouraged * FEMA reviews the submittal against the model ordinance * FEMA will provide a comment letter to community * When approved FEMA will send a letter to the community * Technical Assistance meetings available * Future changes need to be reviewed again * Programmatic approach * Utilizes existing local/state regulations adopted at the local level thus providing flexibility * If item is missing use model ordinance to add language * Meets the minimum requirements of the Biological Opinion (may be salmon centric) * Not required, but highly encouraged Community Checklist ? Building Blocks * SMP * GMA * Critical Areas Ordinances * Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances * Salmon Recovery Plans ? We need to do more * Enact the recovery plans * Lower SEPA thresholds * Higher regulatory standards * FEMA reviews the submittal against the checklist * FEMA will provide a comment letter to community * When approved FEMA will send a letter to the community * Technical assistance meetings available * Changes need to be reviewed Choosing Your Door ? Door #1 Model Ordinance * Provide a copy of the ordinance and proof of adoption * Similar to Flood Damage Prevention ordinance process currently in place ? Door #2 Checklist * Provide a copy of the checklist with cross references and copies of appropriate local ordinances or written procedures * Detailed explanation on why community thinks that the cited regulation meets the performance standard ? Door #3 Permit by Permit * Provide a letter stating that your intention is to not permit any projects in the SFHA unless project demonstrates compliance with ESA * Explain how this is set in code, policy, or procedure Enforcement ? Community Assistance Visits (CAV)/Community Assistance Contacts (CAC) ? Failure to Enforce * * * * Habitat Assessment Workshops ? FEMA and NMFS will conduct 4 workshops this spring * North Sound Burlington- April 21 * Mid-Sound Snohomish County * South Sound Lacey/Tacoma * Olympic Peninsula Bremerton- April 22 Contact Information John Graves, CFM 130 228th Street SW Bothell, WA 98021 425-487-4737 john.graves1@dhs.gov More Information