DRAFT Texas MMMS – Business Plan SummaryData based on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality dated April 19, 2004 and other FEMA sources feBruarY 2006 preliMinarY sTudies legend DFIRM Preliminary Dates Source: FEMA Regional Flood Study Sequencing by County, December 2005. purpose of Business plan suMMarY The Map Modernization Management Support (MMMS) Business Plan Summary was compiled by reviewing the Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-09 MMMS Business Plans and FY06 updates from the business plans submitted to the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The business plan summary highlights the proposed and completed MMMS activities that each FEMA MMMS Partner has undertaken, presents how the FEMA Regional Office allocated its funding from FEMA Headquarters to each State in Federal FY05, and identifies risk factors that may have impacted the FEMA MMMS Partner’s resources. All of these categories are shown in relation to the Flood Map Modernization mapping schedule. sTaTe Vision for Map ModernizaTion and iMpleMenTaTion The State of Texas’ vision recognizes the importance of up to date flood hazard information and supports the creation, maintenance, and dissemination of current Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs). The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) coordinator for Texas and will facilitate the implementation of a statewide strategy for the creation, maintenance, and dissemination of DFIRMs. The State has identified performance goals for current and future activities. The performance goals/ measures are as follows: • Provide update to state business plan annually; • Continue NFIP compliance efforts related to updated floodplain mapping; • Participate in community outreach activities; • Participate in project scoping; • Participate with FEMA in preparing an inventory of digital base maps; • Work with FEMA to adopt technical standards agreements; • Prepare digital base map for use in DFIRM production; • Work with FEMA to provide study coordination; and • Investigate and/or maintain and disseminate flood maps. significanT parTnerships The TCEQ currently coordinates with local, State, and Federal agencies regarding NFIP activities. The TCEQ coordinates with county and local communities through the Texas Municipal League, Council of Governments, River Authorities, the Association of Counties, the Texas Floodplain Management Association, Floodplain Management Coalitions as well as other associations and interested groups. The TCEQ also coordinates Please See Page 2 feMa's oBjecTiVes for flood Map ModernizaTion Establish and maintain a premier data collection and delivery system Achieve effective program and project management Build and maintain mutually beneficial partnerships Expand and better inform the user community regional and sTaTe View Source: State percentage received of total FY05 Flood Map Modernization Regional production budget according to internal FEMA procurement data (PALT). Texas 56.7% federal fY05 region Vi funding distribution Total $28,082,087 Oklahoma 8.7% Arkansas 10.2% New Mexico 4.9% Texas CTP – 4.9% Texas MMMS – 0.5% Texas Non-CTP Mapping Funds51.3% Louisiana 19.6% accoMplished acTiViTies fY05 MMMs acTiViTies planned fY06 None stated None stated page 2 DRAFTTexas MMMS – Business Plan SummaryData based on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality dated April 19, 2004 and other FEMA sources with FEMA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Other State agencies that would be involved with the Map Modernization efforts include the Texas Department of Public Safety, Department of Emergency Management, and the Texas Water Development Board. Additionally, the State is pursuing the development of interagency agreements to provide base maps and some high-resolution topographic data to support the mapping effort. unMeT needs of Texas' Map ModernizaTion prograM Additional staff resources at the State level would be an important component in ensuring greater local involvement. sTaTe populaTion sTaTisTics sTaTe and regional KeY perforMance indicaTors progress The leverage effort toward digital flood hazard data will be through in- kind services and use of available base maps, topography, hydrologic and hydraulic studies. 2000 Census PoPulation & PoPulation Growth (1990–2000) 2000 state PoPulation rank within fema reGionfema reGional PoPulation20,851,820 / 22.8% 1st 33,263,896 Source: U.S. Census Bureau federallY declared disasTers/eMergencies BY calendar Year texas 2004 (Disasters as of 12/06/05) 2005 (Disasters as of 12/06/05) Federally Declared Disasters None Hurricane Rita – September 24 flood insurance and loss suMMarY froM 1978 To noVeMBer 30, 2005 total Current PoliCies total Premium ($)** number of Claims*** total Dollars PaiD ($)**** number of rePetitive loss ProPerties national rankinGs* 474,783 $192,212,572 168,834 $2,726,660,232 15,940 2nd 2nd 3rd 1st * National ranking based on NFIP NextGen data; ranked from highest to lowest. *** The total number of claims reported. ** The total amount of premiums for policies in-force. **** The total amount paid on claims. Draft FY05-FY09 MHIP, Version 1.5: http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=2207