Proposed Site Architectural Drawing Environmental Assessment Joplin FD Proposed Fire Station No. 4 Joplin, MO FEMA-1980-DR-MO January 2013 FEMA Region VII 9221 Ward Parkway, Suite 300 Kansas City, MO 64114 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED FIRE STATION NO. 4 FEMA-1980-DR-MO 3402 SOUTH HEARNES BOULEVARD JOPLIN, MISSOURI For Submittal to: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 9221 WARD PARKWAY, SUITE 300 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64114 Prepared for: CHIEF MITCHELL D. RANDLES JOPLIN FIRE DEPARTMENT 303 EAST THIRD STREET JOPLIN, MISSOURI 64801 Prepared by: NPN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 1631 HEADLAND DRIVE ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63026 January 2013 Contract C-12237 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Project: Environmental Assessment Proposed Fire Station No. 4 FEMA-1980-DR-MO 3402 South Hearnes Boulevard Joplin, Missouri Project No.: Contract C-12237 This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Joplin Fire Department solely for the purpose of documenting the above-titled project. This report and all documents contained herein shall not, in whole or in part, be disseminated or conveyed to any other party, nor used by any other party in whole or in part, without written consent of NPN Environmental Engineers, Inc. and Joplin Fire Department. However, NPN Environmental acknowledges and agrees that the report being submitted to Federal Emergency Management Agency may be conveyed as public information. As part of NPN Environmental's QA/QC practices and procedures, this report has been reviewed and approved by the following: Project Manager: Ruth C. Mannebach QA/QC Manager: Kimberly A. Polacek It is the professional opinion of David B. Rowe, P.E., a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Missouri, that good environmental engineering practices were employed on this project. Name: David B. Rowe, P.E. Title: Principal Signature: Date: January 11, 2013 Missouri Registration Number E-24039 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL................................................... i LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................. ii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1 PURPOSE AND NEED.................................................................... 2 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................... 3 No Action Alternative............................................................... 3 Proposed Action..................................................................... 3 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed............................................... 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ......................................... 5 Physical Resources.................................................................. 5 Water Resources..................................................................... 8 Biological Resources................................................................ 9 Cultural Resources ................................................................. 11 Socioeconomic Resources............................................................. 12 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................. 14 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ................................................................. 15 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT.................................................................. 17 MITIGATION MEASURES AND PERMITS .................................................... 18 AGENCY COORDINATION AND REFERENCES ................................................. 19 LIST OF PREPARERS .................................................................. 21 TABLE Table 1 – Summary of Affected Environments and Impacts............................. 15 APPENDIXES Appendix A Figures Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Site Location Appendix B Draft Facility Layout Appendix C Site Photographs Appendix D Additional Documentation Appendix E Agency Consultation Correspondence LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CFR Code of Federal Regulations CWA Clean Water Act EA Environmental Assessment FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency MDNR Missouri Department of Natural Resources NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System SHPO State Historic Preservation Office USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service INTRODUCTION The Joplin Fire Department (Joplin FD) serves the corporate limits of the City of Joplin in the southwest corner of Jasper County and the northwest corner of Newton County, as well as providing mutual response/automatic aid to the Carl Junction Fire Protection District. The department previously had seven existing fire stations within their geographic service area until two stations were destroyed during the May 2011 EF-5 tornado. The two stations impacted by the tornado are currently operating out of portable office trailers and temporary shelters. The proposed new Fire Station No. 4 would replace the existing station located at 2010 East 15th Street that was destroyed by the tornado. The project site acquired by the City of Joplin for the proposed new Fire Station No. 4 is consistent with fire department program priorities and long-term regional planning objectives and will reduce overlaps in firehouse service areas, and significantly increase response capabilities to the community. NEPA requires that Federal agencies consider the environmental consequences of Proposed Actions before deciding to fund an action. The intent of NEPA is to protect, restore, or enhance the environment through well-informed decision making. The Council on Environmental Quality was established under NEPA to implement and oversee Federal policy in this process and implemented the procedural provisions of NEPA codified at 40 CFR 1500-1508. An Environmental Assessment (EA) related to a FEMA program must be prepared according to the requirements of the Stafford Act and 44 CFR Part 10. This EA has been prepared to evaluate the potential effects to the natural and human environment from relocation and construction of a new fire station. PURPOSE AND NEED This EA provides information to support FEMA Region VII's public assistance grant program. The purpose of the Proposed Action is to provide funding for construction of a new fire station under a disaster recovery public assistance grant. The proposed Fire Station No. 4 is needed to provide effective and timely fire protection and emergency services to the south/central portion of the City of Joplin and surrounding municipalities. The original Fire Station No. 4 was destroyed by a tornado and replaced in the same location with a temporary facility which does not provide adequate quarters for assigned fire station personnel and weatherized shelter for the fire apparatus. The apparatus shelter (essentially a tent) cannot be adequately heated during the winter months and the fire department has struggled with maintaining the equipment in a constant state of readiness due to equipment freezing. Although the original fire station building was adequate for the mission, the property is constrained by size for future expansion and modernization of facilities. Additionally, approximately 85% of the primary response coverage area of the property at 2010 East 15th Street is overlapped by the primary response coverage area of three other fire stations located in close proximity. The proposed new fire station will replace an existing temporary facility (portable trailer and tent) that is inadequate for housing personnel and apparatus. Critical flaws of the original Fire Station No. 4 property at 2010 East 15th Street cannot feasibly be corrected due to lot size and location constraints. The proposed new fire station location at 3402 South Hearnes Boulevard will significantly improve coverage to underserved areas of the community; reduce significant overlaps with service areas of other fire stations; provide support to redevelopment of South Main Street; provide first response coverage to three hospitals, two elementary schools, and the interstate highway; and enhance the Joplin FD's ability to respond to crises by providing a more optimally located modern facility able to house modern fire apparatus. ALTERNATIVES NEPA requires the investigation and evaluation of reasonable project alternatives, including impacts to the natural and human environment as part of the planning process. This EA addresses two alternatives, the No Action alternative and the Proposed Action. Prior to selecting and acquiring the property for the Proposed Action, the Joplin FD informally considered four other alternative locations which were ultimately dismissed due to site access limitations, topographic constraints, infrastructure development costs, prohibitive land values, or failure to align with emergency response goals. No Action Alternative The No Action alternative would result in continued operation of the temporary fire station at the 2010 East 15th Street location. This action would leave emergency response times to this area of the community and surrounding areas unchanged and likely to increase with future population growth and development. As the temporary facility does not provide adequate quarters for assigned fire station personnel or weatherized shelter for the fire apparatus, fire department readiness to respond to emergency situations is hampered. The No Action alternative would result in lower level of overall public safety than the proposed alternative. Proposed Action The Proposed Action would result in construction of a new fire station on property currently owned by the City of Joplin at 3402 South Hearnes Boulevard, within the city limits of Joplin, Missouri, as shown on Figure 1 – Vicinity Map in Appendix A – Figures. The preliminary design calls for an approximately 6790 square foot, 2-story fire station with 2 drive-through vehicle bays (Appendix B – Draft Facility Layout). An equipment and gear storage room and decontamination area will be located adjacent to the bay area and vehicle exhaust will be vented to the outdoors with an NFPA 1500 compliant exhaust extraction system. The living quarters will include a kitchen, dining area, day room, restrooms, bedrooms, office, fitness center, mechanical room, and laundry room. An elevator will also be provided. A final design has not been completed; however, the building will incorporate "green design" features to the LEED silver accreditation level, although at this time there are no plans to obtain LEED certification. All utilities are currently available to the site and the building will be tied into existing municipal water and sewer and the local electric utility. A backup generator system will also be installed to support building functions during power outages. The property is located in an area that has been zoned as a commercial district and allows for construction of a fire station with no changes to zoning designation. Construction of a new Fire Station No. 4 at the 3402 South Hearnes Boulevard location will significantly improve coverage to underserved areas of the community; reduce significant overlaps with service areas of other fire stations; provide support to redevelopment of South Main Street; provide first response coverage to three hospitals, two elementary schools, and the interstate highway; and provide a modern facility able to house modern fire apparatus. Photographs of the project site and adjacent properties taken on November 7, 2012 are included in Appendix C – Site Photographs. Alternatives Considered and Dismissed Joplin FD considered the possibility of reconstructing a permanent fire station at the original location (East 15th Street). Due to the small size of the parcel, a new fire station would be limited to the same construction footprint as the station destroyed by the tornado, which would not allow for housing of modern apparatus, future expansion of the building, or acquisition of additional apparatus in response to community development trends. Additionally, utilizing the original location would continue the current situation of significant overlap in coverage area with three nearby stations and lack of coverage to critical areas of redevelopment (including hospitals and schools) following the tornado. Limitations associated with property constraints and emergency response coverage are considered by the Joplin FD to be critical flaws of the original location and this option has been dismissed. Four other parcels available for construction of the proposed fire station were considered by the Joplin FD and dismissed. A parcel at South Hearnes Boulevard and 36th Street owned by the Missouri Department of Transportation was considered and rejected due to steep topography, access limitations, and the presence of a drainage way which prohibits development. A parcel at South Hearnes Boulevard and 40th Street was considered and rejected as a residential lot with size constraints. A parcel at South Hearnes Boulevard and 42nd Street was considered and rejected due to the prohibitive land value of the commercial lot. A parcel at South Hearnes Boulevard and 44th Street was considered and rejected due to steep topography, prohibitive land value, and failure to adequately provide the desired fire response coverage area. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS Joplin is a city located in Jasper and Newton Counties in southwest Missouri. The city has a total land area of 31.5 square miles. The 2010 United States Census Bureau population included 50,150 people, with a population density of 1,448 people per square mile. The surrounding Metropolitan Statistical Area included 175,518 people in 2010. Recent shifts in the metropolitan demographic indicate an increase in population growth and development to the western and southern portions of Joplin. The proposed Joplin FD Fire Station No. 4 will be located on a 0.49-acre parcel of vacant ground within the city limits, as shown on Figure 2 – Site Location. Historically, the project site was developed for approximately 40 years as a coin-operated Laundromat. The Laundromat was demolished in 2012 and the lot is currently vacant with areas of asphalt and gravel paving. The parcel is currently zoned as C-3, Commercial District. A storm water drainage ditch runs along the right-of-way of South Hearnes Boulevard. Adjacent properties are developed as follows: Dalton's Discount Liquor and Tobacco (N, zoned C-3) City of Joplin Police substation (NE, zoned C-3) Capri Motel (E, zoned C-3, vacant and scheduled for demolition) Duplex residence (S, zoned R-1 Residential) Duplex residences (W, zoned R-1) This section discusses the existing environmental conditions at the proposed project site including descriptions of the physical, biological, and socioeconomic resources throughout the general area and the project site. The characterization of existing conditions provides a baseline for assessing the potential environmental impacts from activities associated with the Proposed Action. Physical Resources The elevation of the project site is approximately 1020 feet above mean sea level, as depicted on the 2011 Joplin West, MO-KS 7.5 minute Quadrangle Maps. The project site and surrounding properties slope gently to the northeast. Storm water flow is routed over land by sheet flow to the storm water drainage ditch and culvert adjacent to the east. A copy of this map (Figure 1) is included in Appendix A. Geology and Soils The general stratigraphy of the project site is characterized by the Cherokee Group of the Desmoinesian Series of the Pennsylvanian System in the Paleozoic Era comprised of the Krebs subgroup. The Krebs subgroup is composed of sandstone, siltstone, shale, clay, limestone, and coal beds. Clastics are predominant as lithologic constituents. In many areas where the Krebs subgroup is located, sandstone composes the greater part of the succession. This subgroup is comprised of the Hartshorne formation (beds of sandstone and shale), Warner formation (conglomerate with coarse-to-fine sandstone), Rowe formation (sandstone, siltstone, underclay, and Rowe coal bed), Drywood formation (fossiliferous limestone, dark gray-to-black shale, fine-grained sandstone, underclay, and Drywood coal bed), Bluejacket formation (dark gray-to-black shale, siltstone, medium- to fine-grained sandstone, underclay, and Bluejacket coal bed), and Seville formation (pinkish-gray to dark gray or black fine crystalline limestone). The project site is located on Clarksville very cherty silt loam (45F) on the eastern edge and Nixa very cherty silt loam (50C) on the western portion. The Clarksville very cherty silt loam with 14 to 35 percent slopes is deep, moderately steep to very steep, somewhat excessively drained soil on the sides and tops of upland ridges adjacent to flood plains and intermittent drainageways. Areas are long and narrow or irregular in shape and range from 5 to several hundred acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown, very friable, very cherty silt loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light yellowish-brown, very friable, very cherty silt loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil (extending to a depth of 60 inches or more) is light yellowish-brown and reddish-yellow, very friable, extremely cherty silt loam in the upper part; red and strong brown, friable, extremely cherty, silty clay loam in the next part; and red, dark red, and yellowish-red, friable, extremely cherty, silty clay loam and silty clay in the lower part. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part of the Clarksville soil and moderate in the lower part. The Nixa very cherty silt loam with 3 to 9 percent slopes is deep, gently sloping and moderately sloping, moderately well drained soil on the tops and sides of ridges in the uplands. Individual areas range from 5 to several hundred acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish-brown, friable, very cherty silt loam about 2 inches thick. The subsurface layer is brown, friable, very cherty silt loam about 10 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil is light yellowish-brown, mottled, friable, very cherty silt loam about 14 inches thick. The next part is a fragipan of strong brown, mottled, firm and brittle, very cherty, silty clay loam about 10 inches thick. The lower part (to a depth of 60 inches or more) is dark red, mottled, firm, very cherty, silty clay and mottled dark red and grayish-brown, firm, extremely cherty clay. In places, the part of the subsoil above the fragipan is silty clay loam. Permeability is moderate above and below the fragipan and very slow in the fragipan. A perched water table is above the fragipan during winter and spring in most years. The USDA defines prime farmland as land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and is available for these uses. It could be cultivated land, pastureland, forestland, or other land, but it is not urban or built-up land or water areas. In accordance with Section 1541 of the Farmland Protection Policy Act, the proposed alternative was reviewed for impacts to prime farmland. Neither soil type is included on the USDA list of prime farmland in Newton County. The Proposed Action will not significantly impact geology or soils at the site. All construction activity will incorporate practices to minimize soil erosion during the construction phase, including the use of best management practices such as installation of silt fencing and straw bales and proper staging of construction equipment. Following completion of the construction phase, the project site will be landscaped with decorative and cover vegetation, reducing the potential for soil erosion. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in new or significant impacts to geology and soils, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. Air Quality The USEPA is required under the Clean Air Act to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards for pollutants harmful to public health and the environment. Primary standards protective of human health and secondary standards protective of public welfare have been established for ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10), and particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5). MDNR does not operate any air quality monitoring stations in Newton County. Two are operated in neighboring Jasper County to the north for primary air pollutants (ozone and particulate matter). Currently, Jasper County, Missouri is considered an attainment/unclassifiable area for ozone and particulate matter (PM10). The Proposed Action will require short-term construction activities including soil excavation and grading, cutting and filling, and soil placement. Heavy equipment including bulldozers, graders, and backhoes will be used during construction. These activities are likely to create fugitive dust; however, best management practices would be used to minimize dust and construction would be completed within a year. Once construction is complete and the facility is operational, the only anticipated source of air emissions would be from vehicle exhaust. As the Proposed Action is for construction of a replacement fire station and does not include acquisition of new vehicles or apparatus, no net increase of emissions over current local levels would occur. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would result in continuation of current, existing impacts to air quality. Water Resources The USACE is responsible for administration of functions regarding navigable waters and wetlands of the United States under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the CWA. A site reconnaissance conducted on November 7, 2012 did not observe any natural surface water bodies (rivers, creeks, ponds, or wetlands) on or adjacent to the project site. The Clarksville and Nixa cherty silt loams present at the property are characterized as well drained soils and neither is classified by the USDA as a hydric soil, one of the three criteria required for determining the presence of wetlands. Therefore, the project site does not contain waters of the United States. Storm water at the project site drains by surface flow to a drainage swale running along the eastern edge of the property. A concrete culvert in the swale transports flow under South Hearnes Boulevard. No evidence of inadequate drainage was observed during the site reconnaissance. Water Quality Disturbance of soils at the project site during construction activity could result in erosion and runoff, which in turn could impact local surface water quality. As the project site is less than 1 acre in size, it is exempt from MDNR requirements for obtaining a land disturbance permit for construction activities. Although not required, best management practices such as silt fencing and mulching will be utilized during construction of the Proposed Action to minimize water quality impacts from site activities. Following construction, the project site will be landscaped and vegetated to reduce the potential for soil erosion. The Proposed Action will have no significant impacts on water quality of waters of the United States and no Section 404 permitting will be required. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in new or significant impacts to water quality as no land disturbance would occur. Wetlands Lands subject to regulation as wetlands under Section 404 of the CWA (jurisdictional wetlands) are defined as: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." Typically, lands that exhibit characteristics of hydrology, support predominantly hydrophytic vegetation, and have a substrate that is predominantly undrained hydric soil are classified as jurisdictional wetlands. The USACE is responsible for administration of Section 404 and the issuance of permits for disturbance of wetlands, including discharge of dredged and fill material. Under Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, Federal agencies are required to take action to minimize the destruction or modification of wetlands. The project site is located on Clarksville and Nixa cherty silt loams, which are characterized as well drained, non-hydric soils. A wetlands map for the project site prepared by the USFWS on-line map service was reviewed (Appendix D – Additional Documentation). No designated wetlands were identified on or adjacent to the project site. In addition, no areas containing wetland characteristics were observed on or adjacent to the project site during the site investigation; therefore, the Proposed Action would have no impacts to wetlands. Wetlands will not be impacted by the No Action alternative as the existing Fire Station No. 4 site does not contain designated wetlands. Floodplains Floodplains provide numerous beneficial environmental functions including flood abatement, stream flow mediation, filtering, and water quality enhancement. Federal agencies are required to minimize the occupancy and modification of floodplains under Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management. Under this order, construction within the 100-year floodplain (500-year floodplain for critical facilities) is prohibited from receiving Federal funding unless there are no practical alternatives. According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel 29097C0267D, the project site is located in an area classified as Zone X, outside defined floodplains (Appendix D). As such, the Proposed Action would not have an impact on floodplains. Floodplains will not be impacted by the No Action alternative as the existing Fire Station No. 4 site is not located in a designated floodplain. Biological Resources Under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, Federal agencies must review Proposed Actions to ensure they are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species or to destroy or adversely modify its critical habitat. Threatened/Endangered Species and Critical Habitat The USFWS lists the following species in Newton County, Missouri: Gray bat (endangered) – caves Indiana bat (endangered) – caves/mines, small stream corridors with well developed riparian woods, upland forests Arkansas darter (candidate) – rivers Neosho madtom (threatened) – rivers Ozark cavefish (threatened) – caves in the Boone and Burlington limestone formations of the Ozark Mountains Neosho mucket (proposed as endangered) – rivers Rabbitsfoot (proposed as threatened) – rivers A Heritage Review Report of Federal and State listed species and critical habitats was requested from the Missouri Department of Conservation Policy Coordination Unit. The Heritage Review Report indicated no wildlife preserves, no designated wilderness areas or critical habitats, no Federal or State endangered list species, and no State-ranked species or natural communities are located within one mile of the project site. The USFWS reviewed the Proposed Action and determined that no Federally listed species, candidate species, or designated critical habitat occurs within the project site. Furthermore, the USFWS determined the Proposed Action will have negligible impacts on wetlands, migratory birds, and other priority fish and wildlife resources. Agency correspondence is included in Appendix E – Agency Consultation Correspondence. Based on agency correspondence, construction of the Proposed Action will have no adverse affect on Federal or state-listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat. Under the No Action alternative, continued use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in new or significant impacts to biological resources, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. Wildlife and Fish The project site is a 0.49-acre upland lot located at the southwest intersection of South Hearnes Boulevard and West 34th Street in an area historically and currently developed with commercial and residential buildings. The site was previously developed with a coin-operated laundry for approximately 40 years. The laundry building was demolished in 2012. No habitats conducive to wildlife are present at the site and any wildlife using or crossing the property would be transitory in nature. There are no surface water bodies present so no fish are located on the site. Thus, the Proposed Action will have no adverse affect on wildlife or fish. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in new or significant impacts to wildlife or fish, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. Cultural Resources Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Federal agencies must consider the potential effects of their actions on historical properties and cultural resources and consult with the MDNR SHPO to resolve any effects. Historic Properties A Section 106 Project Information Form was submitted to the MDNR SHPO to initiate review of the Proposed Action. In a Cultural Resource Assessment dated November 14, 2012, Mr. Mark Miles (Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer) determined that adequate documentation has been provided and there will be "no historic properties affected" by the current project. Agency correspondence is included in Appendix E. Based on the MDNR SHPO review, the Proposed Action will have no adverse effect on cultural or historic resources. Should any evidence of cultural resources (artifacts or human remains) be discovered during construction activities, work would cease and the MDNR SHPO would be notified. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in new or significant impacts to historic properties, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. American Indian Cultural/Religious Sites The State of Missouri does not have a separate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer authorized by the National Park Service. Review of American Indian cultural and religious sites in Missouri is under the purview of the MDNR SHPO. Based on the MDNR SHPO review, the Proposed Action will have no adverse effect on cultural or historic resources. Should any evidence of cultural resources (artifacts or human remains) be discovered during construction activities, work would cease and the MDNR SHPO would be notified. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in new or significant impacts to cultural or religious sites, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. Socioeconomic Resources The 2010 census indicates the population of Joplin consisted of 87.6% white, 0.03% African American, 0.02% Native American, 0.01% Asian, and 0.04% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race was 0.04% of the population. The median income for a household was $30,555 and for a family was $38,888. About 10.5% of families and 14.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 18.8% of those under age 18 and 9.4% of those aged 65 or over. Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 requires that Federal agencies focus on achieving environmental justice by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. Based on discussions with the Joplin FD, the Proposed Action will result in significant upgrades to and enhancement of the department's ability to respond quickly and effectively to all residents and establishments of the City of Joplin, as well as providing mutual aid to a neighboring fire protection district. As such, the Proposed Action will have no adverse effect on environmental justice. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would have no adverse effect on environmental justice, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. Noise The Noise Control Act (NCA) of 1972 provides federal regulation of noise, which is defined as undesirable sound. The NCA gives the USEPA authority to establish guidelines for acceptable ambient noise levels. Under USEPA guidelines, outdoor sound levels in excess of 55 decibels (dB) are considered "normally unacceptable" for noise-sensitive land uses such as residences, schools, and hospitals. The project site is located in the South Hearnes Boulevard corridor and is zoned for commercial development. The project site is bordered by commercial businesses and a police substation to the north and east and by duplex residences to the south and west. Temporary short-term impacts due to noise are anticipated during the construction period. To reduce noise levels during this period, construction activities will take place during normal daylight business hours. The Proposed Action will introduce long-term operational impacts to adjacent residences and school. Fire equipment and station alarms during an emergency can range from approximately 95 to 120 dB. This intermittent elevated noise would be above acceptable levels but would only be sustained for extremely short durations. This impact cannot be mitigated due to NFPA 1901 and State Fire Marshal requirements for minimum sound-warning requirements for fire equipment when responding to an emergency. The City of Joplin Zoning Regulations contain specific standards for noise limitations and sirens, whistles, bells, etc., maintained and used solely to serve a public purpose (such as fire, ambulance, police and air raid warning sirens) are excluded from these regulations (Section 29A-1816). Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would also result in short-term impacts from construction activities and continued long-term use of alarms. Traffic The project site is located in an area along the South Hearnes Boulevard corridor and is zoned for commercial development. Development of the project site with the new fire station would be compatible with this zoning classification. The Missouri Department of Transportation's (MDOT) 2009 Joplin Urban Area average annual daily traffic volume on this stretch of South Hearnes Boulevard is 14,959 vehicles. The project site will be located at 3402 South Hearnes Boulevard and would not adversely affect average daily traffic volume on adjacent roads or general area traffic and circulation. The Proposed Action would result in short-term, intermittent effects to traffic on South Hearnes Boulevard and West 34th Street during fire response actions; however, current design plans do not include egress of emergency vehicles directly onto South Hearnes Boulevard. Emergency vehicles will access South Hearnes Boulevard from West 34th Street. Chief Randles indicated the City of Joplin would consider installation of emergency vehicle warning signs on South Hearnes Boulevard but based on traffic volumes and excellent visibility conditions in the vicinity of the proposed fire station, no other warning devices or traffic signals are proposed. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would result in continuation of existing impacts to traffic flow during emergency response events. Public Service and Utilities The project site is located within an area zoned for commercial development and is surrounded by commercial and residential parcels. All utilities (electric, telephone, water, and sewer) run along South Hearnes Boulevard and/or West 34th Street and are available to the site. A limited amount of trenching and installation of underground lines and connections to the utilities will be required. The Proposed Action will place an additional, limited demand on utilities in the area; however, the utility infrastructure has been designed to accommodate the planned commercial development of the area. Under the No Action alternative continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would result in a continuation of existing demand on local utilities. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative impacts represent the impact on either the natural or human environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. The proposed alternative would occur on a project site zoned for commercial development, which is compatible with construction of the fire station. Other development in this area includes commercial and 2-family residential. Previous development of the project site was as a coin-operated Laundromat, demolished in 2012. Construction of the new fire station represents the replacement of an existing, temporary fire station and would not introduce an additional facility to the community that would potentially result in an increase in cumulative impacts. The new fire station design will incorporate "green building" features that meet stringent environmental standards and energy efficiencies that will lower the overall impact of the new building on the environment. Under the No Action alternative, continuing use of the temporary facility at 2010 East 15th Street would not result in net increases in cumulative impacts to the community, as this location has previously been impacted by construction and development. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS Table 1 – Summary of Affected Environments and Impacts summarizes the potential impacts of the proposed project and, where appropriate, mitigation measures to minimize the impacts. Further discussion of the affected environment is provided in sections following the table. Table 1 – Summary of Affected Environments and Impacts Affected Environment Impacts from Proposed Action Mitigation Geology and Disturbance of shallow soils Implement storm water best Soils during construction activities management practices during construction to minimize erosion; landscape after construction to prevent erosion Air Quality Minor and temporary impacts Air pollution will be minimized from construction vehicle through proper equipment exhaust and fugitive dust during maintenance and dust suppression construction activities techniques during construction Water Quality Minor and temporary impacts Land disturbance permit is not from soil disturbance (erosion required; however, storm water and runoff) during construction best management practices during activities construction to minimize erosion and landscape after construction to prevent erosion will be implemented Wetlands The Proposed Action would not Not applicable impact waters of the United States or wetlands Floodplains The Proposed Action is not Not applicable located in a floodplain Threatened/ No threatened or endangered Not applicable Endangered species or critical habitats are Species located near the Proposed Action Wildlife and No critical habitats or surface Not applicable Fish water bodies are located near the Proposed Action Cultural Coordination with SHPO Not applicable Resources concluded there will be no historic properties affected by the Proposed Action Environmental The Proposed Action would Not applicable Justice benefit all citizens equally Noise Short-term construction noise Construction activities will be impacts and intermittent restricted to normal daylight hours long-term impact from and equipment properly emergency equipment sirens maintained. Mitigation not possible for emergency equipment sirens Traffic Intermittent increase of Emergency vehicle warning signs emergency equipment on State will be considered by the City of Highway 47 Joplin Public Service The Proposed Action will not Not applicable and Utilities place significant demands on in place utility infrastructure Cumulative The new fire station will be Not applicable Impacts constructed on commercially zoned property and will incorporate energy efficient design PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The availability of this EA will be advertised by public notice in The Joplin Globe newspaper and on the City of Joplin website. Copies of the EA will be placed at the following locations in Joplin: Joplin Fire Department 303 East 3rd Street Joplin Public Library 300 South Main Street Joplin City Clerk 602 South Main Street Public Works Office 602 South Main Street (Fourth Floor) The public comment period will extend for a period of 30 days. The EA can be viewed locally at the locations listed above. The EA can also be downloaded from FEMA's website. If no substantive comments are received, the EA will become final and will be archived on FEMA's website. MITIGATION MEASURES AND PERMITS Construction of the Proposed Action will be completed in general accordance with the following mitigation measures to lessen impacts to the local community. During construction, the applicant will water down construction areas as necessary to prevent fugitive dust emissions that would impact local air quality. Additionally, construction equipment will be operated with factory-equipped vehicle emissions controls. Best management practices to reduce or eliminate runoff impacts during construction will be implemented and following construction, the site will be landscaped and vegetated to reduce the potential for soil erosion. Construction noise will be temporary and will be mitigated by limiting construction to normal daylight hours. Construction equipment will be operated with factory-equipped vehicle emissions controls including mufflers. Permits required for the project site will include a building permit issued by the City of Joplin, Missouri. AGENCY COORDINATION AND REFERENCES Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map Online Mapping Service http://msc.fema.gov/ Policy Coordination Section Missouri Department of Conservation PO Box 180 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0180 Heritage Review Report Missouri Department of Natural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Section 106 Review PO Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176 Cultural Resource Assessment, Section 106 Review Missouri Department of Transportation Joplin Area Average Daily Traffic 2009 Missouri Geological Survey Geologic Map of Missouri 2003 Mr. Mitchell D. Randles, Fire Chief Joplin Fire Department 303 East 3rd Street Joplin, MO 64801 Mr. Jack Schaller, Assistant Public Works Director City of Joplin 602 South Main Street Joplin, MO 64801 United States Census Bureau http://www.census.gov United States Department of Agriculture Farm Services Agency 2012 Aerial Photograph United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Newton County, Missouri September 1989 United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Topographic Maps Joplin West, MO-KS USGS 7.5 minute Quadrangle 2011 Mr. Charles Scott and Ms. Amy Salveter United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia Ecological Services Office 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A Columbia, MO 65203 United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Online Mapper http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service State and County Distribution Lists http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/lists/cty_indx.html#missouri LIST OF PREPARERS Those responsible for preparation of this document include: Ruth C. Mannebach, Senior Environmental Scientist NPN Environmental Engineers, Inc. Mitchell D. Randles, Fire Chief Joplin Fire Department Jack Schaller, Assistant Public Works Director City of Joplin Ruth C. Mannebach was the principal preparer of this document, in consultation with Mr. Mitchell D. Randles and Mr. Jack Schaller as well as the other individuals and agencies identified in this document. APPENDIX A Figures Figure 1 - Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Site Locations APPENDIX B Draft Facility Layout APPENDIX C Site Photographs Photo No: 1 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: North Description: Project site (vacant lot, formerly coin-operated laundromat) Photo No: 2 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: East Description: Project site (vacant lot, formerly coin-operated laundromat) Photo No: 3 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: South Description: Project site (vacant lot, formerly coin-operated laundromat) Photo No: 4 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: West Description: Project site (vacant lot, formerly coin-operated laundromat) Photo No: 5 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: North Description: West 34th Street, then Dalton's Discount Liquor & Tobacco and other commercial development adjacent to north Photo No: 6 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: East Description: South Hearnes Boulevard (divided highway), then Joplin Police Substation and Capri Motel (abandoned) adjacent to east Photo No: 7 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: South Description: Single-family residence adjacent to south Photo No: 8 Date: 11-07-12 Viewing Angle: West Description: Ruby Way and duplex residences adjacent to west APPENDIX D Additional Documentation Flood Insurance Rate Map Wetlands Map APPENDIX E Agency Consultation Correspondence