Appeal Brief | Appeal Letter | Appeal Analysis | Back
Second Appeal Letter
PA ID# 113-12000-00; City of Cedar Rapids
PW ID# 99; Direct Administrative Costs
July 25, 2013
Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Division
7105 NW 70th Avenue
Camp Dodge, Bldg. W-4
Johnston, Iowa 50131-1824
Re: Second Appeal–City of Cedar Rapids, PA ID 113-12000-00, Direct Administrative Costs, FEMA-1763-DR-IA, Project Worksheet (PW) 99
Dear Mr. Schouten:
This letter is in response to a letter from your office dated February 21, 2012, which transmitted the referenced second appeal on behalf of the City of Cedar Rapids (Applicant). The Applicant is appealing the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) denial of $75 in Direct Administrative Costs (DAC).
As explained in the enclosed analysis, the Applicant has not demonstrated that the $75 in additional claimed DAC was reasonable and eligible. The Applicant’s second appeal is therefore denied. This determination is the final decision on this matter pursuant to 44 CFR §206.206, Appeals.
In addition, FEMA’s review of this appeal has revealed that the documentation submitted by the Applicant is not sufficiently detailed to enable FEMA to determine whether any of the claimed contracted DAC or Project Management costs are eligible or reasonable. Therefore, by copy of this letter, I am requesting the Regional Administrator de-obligate all contracted DAC and Project Management costs previously approved in PW 99. In accordance with 44 CFR
§206.206 (b)(1), Appeals, Levels of Appeal, the Applicant may appeal, to the Regional Administrator, all Project Management costs and all contracted DAC, with the exception of the $75 denied as stated above.
Please inform the Applicant of my decision.
cc: Beth Freeman
FEMA Region VII